WA Delegate: The Lusophonic Disappointment of Sciongrad (elected )
Founder: The Free Land of The IDU
Regional Power: High
Today's World Census Report
The Largest Timber Woodchipping Industry in International Democratic Union
As a region, International Democratic Union is ranked 15,615th in the world for Largest Timber Woodchipping Industry.
|1.||The Democratic Federation of Grosseschnauzer||Civil Rights Lovefest||“Liberty Equality Justice Security”|
|2.||The Sovereign Principality of Roumberre||Capitalist Paradise||“D'Ursini have, D'Ursini hold.”|
|3.||The Trivian Colony of Trive 39||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“Constantly obeying the Trive's orders.”|
|4.||The Estat Frances i Espanyol of Franxico||Compulsory Consumerist State||“Treball, Família, Pŕtria”|
|5.||The Armed Republic of Republic Federation||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“Liberty is but an opinion”|
|6.||The Republic of Growing Leaderland||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“We are growing to lead”|
|7.||The United Kingdom of Quorland||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“Aiming high”|
|8.||The Democratic Federation of Schnauzer States||Civil Rights Lovefest||“Liberty Equality Justice Security”|
|9.||The Free Land of Purple Eagles||New York Times Democracy||“Velut aquila regia subvola!”|
|10.||The Democratic Federation of Purple Schnauzers||Corporate Bordello||“Liberty Equality Justice Security”|
Last poll: “Sandwiches: Honey, or Condensed Milk?”
- : The Armed Republic of Counter Terrorists of the region Unitys Alliance proposed constructing embassies.
- : The Divine Republic of Sanctaria rejected The Danu Confederacy's request for regional embassies.
- : The Federal Republic of Invictas of the region The Danu Confederacy proposed constructing embassies.
- : The Divine Republic of Sanctaria rejected North Australasia's request for regional embassies.
- : Simper ceased to exist.
- : The Allied States of LionsAndTigersAndBears arrived from Holding pen.
- : Jonhasacat ceased to exist.
- : The Republic of Behecria arrived from The Coalition of Independent Nations.
- : Idu tomb ceased to exist.
- : The Republic of Silvacometopia of the region North Australasia proposed constructing embassies.
International Democratic Union Regional Message Board
That's not exactly what I asked. We have a treaty with TNP, and as I said, they are our closest partners. If they wanted futher relations or inter-regional events, would you be ok with that? Or, diplomatically speaking, would you as Head of Government be able to be civil with their Head of Government?
There are quite a number of WA authors based here in the IDU, and we treasure our treaty and relationship with TNP because of the vote-stack clause. An interruption in relations would not be great.
Remember I was the one who fought in both regions to get an exchange of Embassies a long time ago, and I was the one who served as mediator in order to get that treaty written and ratified, especially over there.
If there's any reason for concern. it would be from that side. Over the years there have been those in TNP who still do not understand that treaty. I won't be the causation of any disputes or problems with TNP; I cannot guarantee what TNP's current leadership group will do.
I think you're overplaying both your own part, and the characters of the current TNP leadership. As MoFA, and as a previous many time Delegate, I have zero problems with TNP and find the region to continue to be cordial and helpful to IDU members. I've had my issues with Asta and COE in the past, but we've always put them aside when working on inter-regional activities.
Just a correction to the above, I was misremembering, and Grosse was an asset to me/the region when passing the IDU-TNP treaty (I was confusing it with the WALL Treaty which happened while Grosse was on sabbatical from the game).
Sanctions, to be clear-- I'm trying to leave that dispute there and not bring it here. You'd be surprised how many TNP old-timers are being shoved aside for COE and Asta's benefit, but I'm not going to name names, just that it's been going on foot three years plus and I'm not the only one on their agenda. And let's just leave it at that. You might find your time better served by getting clearly stated assurances from them and not from me as the IDU isn"t their turf.
They're not running for delegate of the IDU, so I'm not asking for their assurances.
They are our foremost partner, and should they come to us for any reason, I want to know that our Delegate won't tell them where to shove it.
I have served, and will serve the interests of the IDU. I can't speak for them nor do I want to. What you're missing is the possibility that they will resist dealing with me in any capacity, but I am prepared to address that sort of thing when and if it happens. What I will not do is put TNP above the IDU, which is the clear implication of your line of questioning.
Did they stack for Scion's current repeal at vote? If they did, it must've been a short short one before they put their vote against..
I don't know if Scion requested one. You have to request.
And the stack is only when it immediately goes to vote, if the regional poll tells the Delegate to vote against thereafter, (s)he must do so,
Congratulations, and best wishes.