by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .1,6041,6051,6061,6071,6081,6091,610. . .28,08228,083»

The seven provinces

Imperium Anglorum wrote:These are the reserve balances kept by financial institutions at Federal Reserve banks. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/fredgraph.png?g=c4l4 There are significant increases in the size of those reserves since the 2008 recession.

Seems solid, let's hope that's enough :$

Britcarnia wrote:You don't like having a Monarch?

I don't have one. I live in the US. And if I did I am sure I would be shunned by my whole family 😕 Not really but trump supporters + military family + Americans + Patriotic family + cousin that wants to make america British again? It doesn't end well

Germany and east prussia

Lathunia wrote:I don't have one. I live in the US. And if I did I am sure I would be shunned by my whole family 😕 Not really but trump supporters + military family + Americans + Patriotic family + cousin that wants to make america British again? It doesn't end well

And the idea of a monarch is,to me, okay if it isn't absolute. I like democracies

Ukcs

Lathunia wrote:I don't have one. I live in the US. And if I did I am sure I would be shunned by my whole family 😕 Not really but trump supporters + military family + Americans + Patriotic family + cousin that wants to make america British again? It doesn't end well

Sorry for triple posting but by "if I did" I meant if I did like the idea of an absolute monarchy

North richland

Hello, nations of Europe! North Richland has just established an embassy program.

viewtopic.php?t=397065&f=23&view=unread#unread

Tribes of europe wrote:You manage your country by addressing issues, which pop up every so many hours, you join the world assembly to vote on international law, you join a region (which you already did) for company or for positions of power, you can challenge other players (just click on the nation name, beneath the political freedom indicator is a button that says challenge. You can roleplay, or not, whichever you like. It's up to you, really.

Challenge other players?

Oena and sandy island

Britcarnia wrote:BTW where r u guys from? (curious)
Im from HK Hi

Originally from Maryland, US. Living in Stockholm, Sweden now

Britcarnia wrote:Challenge other players?

When you go to another nation's page, a far-right target button that doesn't appear to you on your own page will send you to the "challenge" page, and set you against that nation in a challenge. The challenge page is here:page=challenge.

To quote the challenge page itself:

Games are usually played to the best of 5 rounds. If the dueling nations are not the same level, the higher-level nation begins on a number of points equal to its level advantage. For example, a Level 5 nation will have a 1-point starting advantage against a Level 4 nation.

Nations always have a chance to win any Challenge: the game will play at least as many rounds as is necessary for the lower-level nation to finish ahead, assuming it wins every round. For example, if a Level 1 nation challenges a Level 10 nation, the higher-level nation will begin on 9 points and the game will play up to 10 rounds, all of which the lower-level nation needs to win to claim victory. So it's possible. Not easy. Not really practical. But possible.

And I return, with tales of strange far-leftists hailing me as "the supreme Premier risen again", and unintentionally joining a far right region! (Followed by the region founder saying, and I quote "I somehow believe you got a bit mixed up in the politics of each region. Socialism does not go down well here", menacing but not too unfriendly). But behold, I return un-indoctrinated with far-left/right politics!
I missed Europe.

Axeldonia, Thespolis, The Poland-Lithuania Commonwealth, and European commonwalth

Oena and sandy island wrote:Originally from Maryland, US. Living in Stockholm, Sweden now

Norfolk, England (UK of course)

Germany and east prussia

Lathunia wrote:And the idea of a monarch is,to me, okay if it isn't absolute. I like democracies

That is a common mistake. The opposite of Democracy is not Monarchy; the opposite of Democracy is Autocracy.
Likewise, the opposite of Monarchy is the Republic.

All four combinations exist:

There are autocratic monarchies (=absolute monarchies)
There are autocratic republics
There are democratic monarchies (=parliamentary monarchies)
There are democratic republics

Ukcs

Germany and east prussia

Britcarnia wrote: BTW where r u guys from? (curious) Im from HK Hi

I am originally from Battle Creek. However I am currently living in Vienna, Austria.

The New Nordic Union wrote:There are democratic republics

Ironically, these seem to always be the least democratic.

Ukcs wrote:And I return, with tales of strange far-leftists hailing me as "the supreme Premier risen again", and unintentionally joining a far right region! (Followed by the region founder saying, and I quote "I somehow believe you got a bit mixed up in the politics of each region. Socialism does not go down well here", menacing but not too unfriendly). But behold, I return un-indoctrinated with far-left/right politics!
I missed Europe.

Glad you're back!

Ukcs, European commonwalth, and Germany and east prussia

Axeldonia wrote:Ironically, these seem to always be the least democratic.
Glad you're back!

Nice to feel wlecomed, cheers :D
I was expecting at least one "traitor!" Post xD
Anyway yeah, good to be back.

European commonwalth

The new promised land

Misguided regulation increases risk in the financial system by limiting diversification. Larger, more diversified financial institutions are safer than localized or less diversified financial institutions. "Don't put all of your eggs in one basket" - it's common sense. http://www.frbsf.org/economic-research/publications/economic-letter/2006/may/bank-diversification-economic-diversification/ Banks should be invested in equities, in bonds, in commodities, in real estate, in securities, in derivatives, in everything and anything in order to minimize the risk that's associated should any one of those implode... As for the financial crisis of 2008, Washington, not the Manhattan, is to blame... Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are government chartered enterprises which fed the housing bubble... by buying trillions of dollars in mortgage backed securities from lenders... The banks, knowing that Fannie and Freddie would buy their trash at a premium, had an incentive to fork out as much cash as possible, bundle those mortgages into securities, and then turn around to dump them on Fannie and Freddie for a premium. If, as Republicans had wanted to do, Fannie and Freddie had been privatized (with no implied guarantee of being bailed out by the taxpayer), lending institutions wouldn't have had a guaranteed buyer of sub-prime mortgages... and wouldn't have approved those mortgages. Most of Europe's initial financial crisis, including the City of London's, had to do with their exposure to American sub-prime... Fannie and Freddie triggered a global crisis. http://www.valuewalk.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Fannie-Mae-2-chart.jpg While Fannie and Freddie created the bubble, the Mortgage Interest Deduction didn't help matters - it's a federal income tax deduction that makes real estate more attractive for investors / speculators than bonds, commodities, stocks, etc (BUT ONLY IF THE HOME / ESTATE IS PURCHASED ON CREDIT)... so that, while equities didn't perform so well during the period, real estate boomed. http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1308&context=jcfl We wouldn't need Dodd-Frank or other regulation if (a) Fannie and Freddie is privatized and (b) the Mortgage Interest Deduction is either eliminated or turned into a less generous credit that's actually targeted at those who need the assistance vs. those that speculate on housing.

Britcarnia wrote:BTW where r u guys from? (curious)
Im from HK Hi

I'm from New York :)

North richland and Germany and east prussia

Britcarnia wrote:BTW where r u guys from? (curious)
Im from HK Hi

tejas

Foucaults garden

I thought Trumby wanted to fight the establishment?

The communist east german empire

Garbhaty wrote:I'm from New York :)

I am from Washington D.C.

The new promised land

The New Promised Land is a socialist nation... as it has transcended capitalism. A stable job coupled with a living wage is regarded as a "human right." The nation has a high employment rate and a minimum wage level that's conducive to middle class living. The means of production are state owned. Artificial intelligence manages the nation's conglomerates - among the largest and most profitable in the world and spanning all industries and sectors. Karl Marx's dream of an economy for the worker, by the worker has been realized.

The reserved military

The new promised land wrote:The New Promised Land is a socialist nation... as it has transcended capitalism. A stable job coupled with a living wage is regarded as a "human right." The nation has a high employment rate and a minimum wage level that's conducive to middle class living. The means of production are state owned. Artificial intelligence manages the nation's conglomerates - among the largest and most profitable in the world and spanning all industries and sectors. Karl Marx's dream of an economy for the worker, by the worker has been realized.

Propaganda, I say!

European commonwalth

The communist east german empire wrote:I am from Washington D.C.

I'm from Saint Pauls Bay, in Malta.

European commonwalth wrote:I'm from Saint Pauls Bay, in Malta.

I'm from Oslo, Norway

European commonwalth

Jailbaiting wrote:
I'm from Oslo, Norway

I'm from Barcelona, Catalonia

European commonwalth

Monarchies have no place anymore in modern society. Off with their heads.

«12. . .1,6041,6051,6061,6071,6081,6091,610. . .28,08228,083»

Advertisement