United Empire of IslamBoard

Arain wrote:

It wasn't the Baathists, the military overthrew the monarchy under Qassim. They paraded the king and regents corpses naked and mutilated across Baghdad. The Baathists came into power later. How I know this? Well I like history :)

The thing is Iran doesn't care about Iraq they care about their own interests. They want to re-establish their "Persian dominion." They are only using the rhetoric they are using to further their power. They funded Al Qaeda in Iraq which is now Da3ish and when the Iranians were confronted by Shia religious leaders in Iraq who demanded to know why Iran was funding them since they were enemies of Iraq, the Iranians replied that it was in their interest and that "it would get rid of the Americans". A blatant lie as the Americans also helped create ISIS as stated by Hillary Clinton in her book and leaked/declassified CIA documents. Iran is trying to convince Shiites that they are their protectors and ISIS is being used to develop that false mentality. They are splitting apart Muslims and making the Sunnah and Shia hate eachother all because of their interests. Such is when Rouhani or what is Khamenei's assistant who said that Baghdad is the capital of Iran.

We all have different opinions but never was Qatar and Saudi Arabia innocent niether was Syria's Assad he was the one funding Al Qaeda in Iraq to keep them in the other side of the border and all of the top convicts, the aid, the weapons came from Assad in 2008 while Saudi and Qatar have this unbelievable hate towards us its obvious in thier media (Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera Arabic) but you will never see it from that prospective since its those channels that blame everything on Iran its the typical Arab thing to do im not saying Iran is innocent but it sure did not do what those channels are brainwashing people to think they did.

I wouldn't be suprised if all the nations of the middle east funded ISIS everyone has a intrest in Iraq its the buffer zone of the Middle East.

Kawther wrote:

Those are not nick names they are actual tribes.
i know adding the "i" in the end makes it sound like a nickname but its not its just a shorter way of saying from the tribe of (bani or abu)

But Abadi is a nickname of Abdullah and Alawi a nickname of Ali.

Kawther wrote:

We all have different opinions but never was Qatar and Saudi Arabia innocent niether was Syria's Assad he was the one funding Al Qaeda in Iraq to keep them in the other side of the border and all of the top convicts, the aid, the weapons came from Assad in 2008 while Saudi and Qatar have this unbelievable hate towards us its obvious in thier media (Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera Arabic) but you will never see it from that prospective since its those channels that blame everything on Iran its the typical Arab thing to do im not saying Iran is innocent but it sure did not do what those channels are brainwashing people to think they did.

I wouldn't be suprised if all the nations of the middle east funded ISIS everyone has a intrest in Iraq its the buffer zone of the Middle East.

Saudi and Qatar aren't innocent either they are funding rival groups in Syria and Iraq that are not as bad as ISIS but still pretty bad (IE: Nusra Front, etc.) maybe not on purpose but by funding rebels these groups are bound to get them. Also there are those who say Qatar funded Musallam Al Barrack in Kuwait and were interfering in our internal affairs as evidenced by Qatari cars coming in and participating in illegal demonstrations. I don't take my views from Al Jazeera and Al Arabiya, I have a wide set of networks typically Kuwait TV news, Sky News, BBC, Al Arabiya, Al Jazeera (rarely), even Press TV (I just laugh at Press TV I never take it seriously because its a bunch of rubbish XD). I mainly form opinions over declassified documents, verifiable leaks, sound theories, on top of what the political hierarchy wants you to see. But Iran I really dislike because I can tell it plays on sectarianism the most to expand their power, Saudi just respond to it to contain that power. Iran is trying to make the situation in Yemen sectarian even though Ali Abdullah Saleh who Saudi supported before was also Zaidi.

Come to think of it fifteen years ago at the turn of the century war barely existed, look how much the world has changed since then. Its like we're going back in time to a period where wars and conflicts even between nations is common.

In Iraq the head General of the Army must be Kurdish
the head of the Special forces must be Kurdish
the head of the Airforce must be Kurdish
the head of the navy (which is all the way in Basra) must be Kurdish ect...

How do you get a nations armed forces working when its generals are loyal to the Peshmerga?

Kawther wrote:

In Iraq the head General of the Army must be Kurdish
the head of the Special forces must be Kurdish
the head of the Airforce must be Kurdish
the head of the navy (which is all the way in Basra) must be Kurdish ect...

How do you get a nations armed forces working when its generals are loyal to the Peshmerga?

And all of Saddam's generals are with ISIS. Also why does ethnicity matter the heads of the military should be in the position because of experience, the Americans destroyed Iraq when they wrote that new constitution. Also what is the point of the President? He doesn't do anything. I understand it in Britain because its cultural but why is a President cultural in Iraq is it only to please the ethnic makeup of the country? XD

Kawther wrote:

Yes but the President can remove the prime minister if he turns un-Kurdish lol what a joke

Our Su-25 pilots are Arabs but our F-16 pilots are Kurds...

I think the Iraqi military is basically designed to destroy itself if a civil war ever breaks out...

I missed that flag

Kawther wrote:

Yes and the kurds will win

Kurds will win because they want their own country, in the end all sides would get the same result their own independent country that is a shadow of its predecessor state.

Kawther wrote:

But there is only 1 element that is stopping this from happening the kurds have no insufficient funds of Oil
and independence will result in thier regions destruction
only a fool would leave Iraq which supplies and funds Kurdistan

Considering they have occupied oil rich regions in both Iraq and Syria and have begun illegally trading in the oil while also getting aid from the central givernment I don't think they care anymore.

I wish Zubair still had its original population that accent is just too amazing for it to go extinct. All the Zubairis are either Kuwaitis or Saudis now, the Baathists basically forced them out and barely any of them have the accent anymore. :(

We have an amazing Zubairi neighbour near my grandma's house he's hilarious he still speaks the accent I love him he's so cranky! XD

Arain wrote:

Considering they have occupied oil rich regions in both Iraq and Syria and have begun illegally trading in the oil while also getting aid from the central givernment I don't think they care anymore.

Yes but even that is hardly enough
in comparison to the larger funds from the Government

Kawther wrote:

Yes but even that is hardly enough
in comparison to the larger funds from the Government

If they become independent the Americans and Europeans would be happy to purchase the oil. Turkey won't allow a Kurdish State on its border though so we don't know what they'll do.

Arain wrote:

If they become independent the Americans and Europeans would be happy to purchase the oil. Turkey won't allow a Kurdish State on its border though so we don't know what they'll do.

I think they dont care anymore if Iraq has a turkish state but they certainly wont have the Kurds taking Arab and Turkic lands in Northern Syria