by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .6,0466,0476,0486,0496,0506,0516,052. . .25,49425,495»

Post self-deleted by New sweesonar.

Zanera wrote:I will rendezvous with the Oblarenite fleet and let you strike them first.

Alright then. I need to finish drawing my bombers first.

Just hold on New Sweesonar. I LEFT my hospital ship and left the wounded in order to try and escape. When did I go around saving everyone?

Aznazia wrote:Alright then. I need to finish drawing my bombers first.

*flips onto head*

I need the other fleets to help.

Post self-deleted by New sweesonar.

Oblaren wrote:I need the other fleets to help.

I kind of want more help now...

Oblaren wrote:I need the other fleets to help.

You've got mine moving in to assist.

Aznazia wrote:You've got mine moving in to assist.

How big is it?

Aznazia wrote:You've got mine moving in to assist.

Okay. I'm also sending reinforcements and my Iowa battleships

I would suggest you all do not strike our allies yet in Aarabiyya just yet. I've talked it over with Vekalse and if you want a good storyline it would be better for us to fight Aarabiyya without distractions. Unless you guys are more about winning then actual stories, which is fine by me, but will change my plans ICly and OOCly.

Norvine wrote:I would suggest you all do not strike our allies yet in Aarabiyya just yet. I've talked it over with Vekalse and if you want a good storyline it would be better for us to fight Aarabiyya without distractions. Unless you guys are more about winning then actual stories, which is fine by me, but will change my plans ICly and OOCly.

I need a world map of what is happening...

Norvine wrote:I would suggest you all do not strike our allies yet in Aarabiyya just yet. I've talked it over with Vekalse and if you want a good storyline it would be better for us to fight Aarabiyya without distractions. Unless you guys are more about winning then actual stories, which is fine by me, but will change my plans ICly and OOCly.

But the battle is still going on. I also have an obligation to help an ally of mine and to help bring safety to the seas once again. It does not take long to deploy air units to assist my ally Oblaren against Aarabiyya and it gives me a place close to my nation to strike at.

Zanera wrote:I need a world map of what is happening...

Map maker...

Zanera wrote:How big is it?

2 out of my 3 Battle carriers, 2 new missile destroyers which makes up about 45-50 vessels.

Norvine wrote:I would suggest you all do not strike our allies yet in Aarabiyya just yet. I've talked it over with Vekalse and if you want a good storyline it would be better for us to fight Aarabiyya without distractions. Unless you guys are more about winning then actual stories, which is fine by me, but will change my plans ICly and OOCly.

But I'm already there..

Aznazia wrote:2 out of my 3 Battle carriers, 2 new missile destroyers which makes up about 45-50 vessels.

Are we just going to attack them?

Aznazia wrote:Map maker...

Get one.

Aznazia wrote:But the battle is still going on. I also have an obligation to help an ally of mine and to help bring safety to the seas once again. It does not take long to deploy air units to assist my ally Oblaren against Aarabiyya and it gives me a place close to my nation to strike at.

I'll make an OOC promise with you. The IL will tell you when we attack Yaramaqui OOCly so you can defend your ally. But this is vital to a better war and storyline.

Oblaren wrote:But I'm already there..

You can't win all the time...I'm not saying you have to surrender, but you can just leave. OOCly we have been losing cities and posting lots of losses so its not fair if we "win" say 75% of our battles and you guys have to win all of them.

Aznazia wrote:That sounds cool.

Yeah. I'll tell him about RPing and stuff so hopefully it will all go well.

Norvine wrote:I'll make an OOC promise with you. The IL will tell you when we attack Yaramaqui OOCly so you can defend your ally. But this is vital to a better war and storyline.

You can't win all the time...I'm not saying you have to surrender, but you can just leave. OOCly we have been losing cities and posting lots of losses so its not fair if we "win" say 75% of our battles and you guys have to win all of them.

Escaping would be impossible without even more loses.

Norvine wrote:I'll make an OOC promise with you. The IL will tell you when we attack Yaramaqui OOCly so you can defend your ally. But this is vital to a better war and storyline.

You can't win all the time...I'm not saying you have to surrender, but you can just leave. OOCly we have been losing cities and posting lots of losses so its not fair if we "win" say 75% of our battles and you guys have to win all of them.

And you can't lose IC cities OOCly...

Norvine wrote:I'll make an OOC promise with you. The IL will tell you when we attack Yaramaqui OOCly so you can defend your ally. But this is vital to a better war and storyline.

You can't win all the time...I'm not saying you have to surrender, but you can just leave. OOCly we have been losing cities and posting lots of losses so its not fair if we "win" say 75% of our battles and you guys have to win all of them.

I am fine with RPing's loses but I don't see why I can not attack you where your alliance is weak. I would rather destroy the fleet there rather than wait for it to attack Yaramaqui. Also Yaramaqui has declared war on you as well so you should expect to see an attack from him soon after him.

Oblaren wrote:And you can't lose IC cities OOCly...

Let me rephrase. We have been losing IC cities. I was saying OOCly because OOCly we have posted we are losing. Sorry it was confusing.

Oblaren wrote:Escaping would be impossible without even more loses.

Either way you're going lose more people, doesn't matter if you return or not.

Zanera wrote:Are we just going to attack them?

We will. If you could attack them from the South while I fire my anti-ship missiles from the north then we can trap them in a cross fire and inflict some heavy loses.

«12. . .6,0466,0476,0486,0496,0506,0516,052. . .25,49425,495»

Advertisement