by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .74757677787980. . .102103»

For you maybe.

Klesh speaks!

I made it unanimous.

Klesh has spoken!

Feral industries

Liberidad wrote:Sweet! How do we buy them?

I have a breakdown of ships here to make easier:

Fighters/recon/single pilot/small transport: can be used for many things but most often as fighters or interceptors. They also are used as mining ships for rare resources in highly dangerous areas, especially A-Wing.

Z-95 Headhunter
Heavy Z-95 Headhunter
A-wing
T-Wing Interceptor

Feral Industries M3-A "Scyk" Interceptor
Heavy "Scyk" Interceptor
Naboo N-1 Starfighter
Feral Industries "Kihraxz" Assault Fighter
Belbullab-22
Eta-2 Actis Interceptor
Vaksai Starfighter

Light TIE Fighter
TIE Fighter
TIE/ln Fighter
TIE Interceptor
Imperial Guard TIE Interceptor
TIE Advanced

Medium fighter-bombers/medium transport/small mining: more capacity for variety and storage but less maneuverable than pure fighters but also more firepower. Y-wing Longprobe is single seated and popular as a miner

Y-wing
Y-wing Longprobe
X-wing
Advanced X-wing

Feral Industries G1-M4-C "Dunelizard" Starfighter
Feral Industries "Ixiyen" Fast Attack Craft
ARC-170

TIE Aggressor
TIE Defender

heavy bomber/medium transport/light miner: great for all roles even fighters what it loses in size and maneuverable it makes up for in defense and firepower. B-wing is excellent miner as is y-8, y-8 is really good since it allows multiple gunners to track and retrieve resources. Firespray and TIE bomber is also a popular miner

B-wing

Feral Industries Firespray
Feral Industries M12-L "Kimogila" Multi-role Starfighter
Feral Industries "Rihkxyrk" Attack Ship
Havoc Starfighter
Feral Industries M22-T "Krayt" Gunship
Y-8 Mining Ship

TIE Bomber
TIE Oppressor

Frigate/large transport/large miner: most popular is yt-1300 and is often customized as a smuggler. Yt-2400 is newer version but not as popular. In the hands of a good pilot and gunners it is even a match for frigates who usually have far more firepower but are less maneuverable and fast. The Vigo is normally the largest transport but is easily customized into a formidable frigate class gunship.

YKL-37R Nova Courier
Feral Industries X-4 Gunship
YT-2400
YT-1300
Feral Industries AEG-77 Vigo Gunship

VT-49 Decimator
YE-4 Gunship

Telegram me if you want to place order or more deails

Since our recent demise of our Energy Minister I would like to appoint Feral industries . If anyone else wants to throw their hat in the ring let me know and I will set up a poll.

Liberidad would have been just passing the 400 day mark of being the region's delegate to the WA if not for that small boil. Congratulations and keep up the good work!

Darkhunters

Energy minister sounds fun for us. Our primary source of energy is from brain waves.

Undivulged Principles and Darkhunters

Undivulged Principles wrote:Liberidad would have been just passing the 400 day mark of being the region's delegate to the WA if not for that small boil. Congratulations and keep up the good work!

Thanks CUP!

The united states personified

Obrhesh died. I wanna be Justice Advisor!

I'm going to wait a bit before opening that one up but your candidacy has been noted.

Klesh speaks!

Anyone else get spam from Europe?

Klesh has spoken!

No.

Klesh wrote:Klesh speaks!
Anyone else get spam from Europe?
Klesh has spoken!

Nope. You must be popular.

[WA]

Resolution at Vote:

Proscription of Living Shields

Description:

Singing the praises of this Assembly’s many successes in the realm of protecting the unarmed and innocent in times of armed conflict,

Enthusiastically hoping further measures to be unnecessary, yet

Pessimistically noting the above to be exceedingly unlikely,

Remembering the protections extended to all manner of noncombatants and civilians in war by this august Assembly,

Disgusted at the increasing incidence of these protections being used against the very states sworn to uphold them,

Finding the practice of using individuals as living shields to be deliberately contrary to the historic goals of the World Assembly of protecting human rights and ensuring peace, and

Righteously amending this wrong,

1. The World Assembly defines the use of living shields as the act of an armed party intentionally utilizing unarmed noncombatants, be they volunteers or otherwise, to shield themselves or tangible assets in such a way as to compel a strategic or tactical advantage by way of manipulating a third party’s obligation to respect the protected status of the noncombatants or their perceived value therein.

2. The World Assembly further defines noncombatants to include both civilians who belong to a protected status or are otherwise taking no direct part in the hostilities, and those belligerents who, having been granted Prisoner of War or hors de combat status, are unable to take a direct part in hostilities.

3. Member states shall consider the use of individuals as living shields in the course of armed conflict illegal and a war crime.

4. Member states shall consider the use of individuals as living shields to be an aggravating circumstance when prosecuting or otherwise dealing with violators of international law, and are encouraged to take the necessary steps to protect those hostages from harm.

5. Member states shall consider a belligerent’s use of living shields a mitigating circumstance when dealing with the prosecution of troops who, due to the enemy’s violation of these provisions, find themselves directly or indirectly responsible for the accidental violation of a noncombatant’s protected status, and are encouraged to acquit the accused in situations wherein gross negligence cannot be ascribed.

6. Member states are permitted to prosecute unarmed noncombatants who voluntarily serve as living shields as they would prosecute combatants who utilize such living shields.

a. Member states are encouraged, in instances where it cannot be determined whether an individual was voluntarily or forcibly taken as a living shield, to offer to resettle those individuals in an area away from the conflict.
b. If those individuals refuse and, subsequently, are repeatedly utilized as living shields in a manner that calls into question the non-voluntary nature of their participation, member states are permitted to prosecute and detain them accordingly.

Voting ends in 3 days

I vote yes to the resolution.

Psi planet wrote:Energy minister sounds fun for us. Our primary source of energy is from brain waves.

I wanted to know if you could elaborate on what toy meant by brainwaves as an energy source.

Feral industries

Our structural engineers have developed all sorts of energy. Hydro, solar, thermal, mineral, wind. We don't have brainwave tech but it sounds useful. If I was Energy Advisor I would promote it.

Feral industries

The three banners on my page are a dunelizard fighter, a royal tie interceptor and a yt-1300.

Undivulged Principles wrote:I vote yes to the resolution.
I wanted to know if you could elaborate on what toy meant by brainwaves as an energy source.

We harness and store theta waves taken when we dream and use the electrical energy gained to power most of our equipment.

Dream weavers are used to enhance dream experience.

The dream weaver then prompts deep sleep to heal the mind and rejuvenate.

Our people are psions.

We use other energy sources but brain waves are dominant source.

Truechristianity

Liberidad wrote:[WA]
Resolution at Vote:
Proscription of Living Shields

Description:
Singing the praises of this Assembly’s many successes in the realm of protecting the unarmed and innocent in times of armed conflict,
Enthusiastically hoping further measures to be unnecessary, yet
Pessimistically noting the above to be exceedingly unlikely,
Remembering the protections extended to all manner of noncombatants and civilians in war by this august Assembly,
Disgusted at the increasing incidence of these protections being used against the very states sworn to uphold them,
Finding the practice of using individuals as living shields to be deliberately contrary to the historic goals of the World Assembly of protecting human rights and ensuring peace, and
Righteously amending this wrong,
1. The World Assembly defines the use of living shields as the act of an armed party intentionally utilizing unarmed noncombatants, be they volunteers or otherwise, to shield themselves or tangible assets in such a way as to compel a strategic or tactical advantage by way of manipulating a third party’s obligation to respect the protected status of the noncombatants or their perceived value therein.
2. The World Assembly further defines noncombatants to include both civilians who belong to a protected status or are otherwise taking no direct part in the hostilities, and those belligerents who, having been granted Prisoner of War or hors de combat status, are unable to take a direct part in hostilities.
3. Member states shall consider the use of individuals as living shields in the course of armed conflict illegal and a war crime.
4. Member states shall consider the use of individuals as living shields to be an aggravating circumstance when prosecuting or otherwise dealing with violators of international law, and are encouraged to take the necessary steps to protect those hostages from harm.
5. Member states shall consider a belligerent’s use of living shields a mitigating circumstance when dealing with the prosecution of troops who, due to the enemy’s violation of these provisions, find themselves directly or indirectly responsible for the accidental violation of a noncombatant’s protected status, and are encouraged to acquit the accused in situations wherein gross negligence cannot be ascribed.
6. Member states are permitted to prosecute unarmed noncombatants who voluntarily serve as living shields as they would prosecute combatants who utilize such living shields.
a. Member states are encouraged, in instances where it cannot be determined whether an individual was voluntarily or forcibly taken as a living shield, to offer to resettle those individuals in an area away from the conflict.
b. If those individuals refuse and, subsequently, are repeatedly utilized as living shields in a manner that calls into question the non-voluntary nature of their participation, member states are permitted to prosecute and detain them accordingly.

Voting ends in 3 days

For.

[WA]

New Resolution at vote.

Researching New Ecosystems

Encouraged by the ongoing efforts of the international community to invest in biological research,

Impressed by some of the potential technologies and cures that have developed from this research, but

Concerned by the rate at which unique ecosystems are disappearing, either to man-made activity or to natural changes in climate,

This august World Assembly hereby enacts the following, subject to any limits imposed by earlier resolutions that are still in force:

Defines for the purposes of this resolution:

'unique ecosystem' as any area which is reasonably likely to contain flora and fauna that are unique to the larger ecosystem,

'man made activity' as action or continued inaction taken by sentient beings that endangers the biodiversity of a unique ecosystem, up to and including mining, logging, construction or introduction of invasive species, but not counting acts of war,

'natural changes in climate' as any foreseeable, long term natural event or change that endangers the biodiversity of a unique ecosystem, such as long term drought, rise in sea levels or global cooling;

Requires nations where man-made activity may be reasonably expected to seriously compromise a unique ecosystem to make reasonable expeditions, within their abilities, into the unique ecosystem to take stock of and collect samples of unique flora and fauna within the region;

Requires nations with ongoing natural changes in climate that threaten to seriously compromise unique ecosystems to make reasonable expeditions, within their abilities, into the unique ecosystem to take stock of and collect samples of unique flora and fauna within the region.

Expands the duties of the World Assembly Science Program (WASP) to include:

Monitoring global climate changes to identify unique ecosystems under threat, and to notify nations of said threat to their unique ecosystems,

Storing and providing access to raw data from nations who have shared with the WASP,

Raising and providing funds and scientific support for nations who do not have the capacity to conduct a reasonable scientific expedition;

Encourages nations to share raw data from above expeditions with the World Assembly Science Program (WASP)

Voting ends in 3 days.

Post self-deleted by Undivulged Principles.

I am in favor of the resolution.

That was a pitiful invasion attempt.

I am waiting on a reply from our current justice advissor befoore opening up the post.

Feral industries is our new energy advisor. Congratulations

Post by Tdjxdgf suppressed by a moderator.

Have you guys seen the news? It looks like NationStates will now allow us to appoint regional officers as part of the game. Hahaha

Post by Tdjxdgf suppressed by a moderator.

I am mulling what to do about regional officers option now available in game. The influence portion of this new function leaves much to be desired and I need to research it further.

«12. . .74757677787980. . .102103»

Advertisement