The Western IslesBoard

Miklania wrote:

You only say that because you're losing.

Tbf they aren't very exciting. They could be spiced up with modifiers.

Give each of them random buffs/debuffs like in the game Superfight

Maybe then it'd be more enrapturing

Polar svalbard wrote:

Why not? It's an interesting question about the power of a nation compared to another one. I try to pair ones up that are close in strength in my mind.

Wait you deleted it? Alright now I do want a response.

Miklania wrote:

"We are going to get the boat back real soon you commie sons of bitches "
"Arrived to discover that Kim Jong Un had eaten the ship"
"Give back our ship you bastards."
"Went there last year, got a nice picture with the Eternal Supreme Leader showing off my Hawaiian good luck sign."

Lmao

Those lions would tear those geese apart. Not even a contest. The headaches would only serve to fuel their bloodthirst.

Polar svalbard wrote:

That's not a reason to delete the poll. Maybe next time he does a random poll I'll delete his. Same could be said about the word ones.

Oi chill. That's the king you're talking bout

Agadar wrote:

Those lions would tear those geese apart. Not even a contest. The headaches would only serve to fuel their bloodthirst.

are you just completing ignoring the sore leg, you absolute fool, you ignorant wreck

Miklania wrote:

The big problemo is all the artillery pointed directly at Seoul.

It's just more brown people. According to Nights edge we don't care about them;) but yeah that would be a massacre. Well entrenched, presighted, while 9 yards. Itd be tough to take that out.

Vancouvia wrote:

okay it seemed to me like it was just like "who do you like more" not who would win in a fight (also what does that even mean, a fight where and when and with what?) because you didn't have a description up. sorry for deleting it

A fight betwix your two nations mano y mano. This would take into account your power projection capabilities, your manpower, economies, all that sort of things. Sorry for not putting up a description on that one, I will make sure I do so next time I do a poll.

I chose you as your nation seems like it could better put forth the necessary power projection needed to fight Atnaia. Although I could see arguments for Atnaia's nation coming out on top in the fight.

Polar svalbard wrote:

A fight betwix your two nations mano y mano. This would take into account your power projection capabilities, your manpower, economies, all that sort of things. Sorry for not putting up a description on that one, I will make sure I do so next time I do a poll.
I chose you as your nation seems like it could better put forth the necessary power projection needed to fight Atnaia. Although I could see arguments for Atnaia's nation coming out on top in the fight.

well im not interested in being compared, I think it just creates division and leads to more military inflation

Ventlimer wrote:

But maybe using those moabs on the targets would be enough? Literally the biggest bomb we got

Scattered, dug in and hidden artillery is going to be nearly impossible to destroy before it kills an unacceptable amount of civilians

Corindia wrote:

Scattered, dug in and hidden artillery is going to be nearly impossible to destroy before it kills an unacceptable amount of civilians

Yeah. That's true. If NK attacked first, it would be bad at first, but we'd respond. So many civies would die, tho. Aleppo would be nothing compared to the death in Seoul. Pyongyang would subsequently be turned to ash.

I was one-hundred percent going to delete this poll, but then I remembered it would be petty. Even though this poll is silly and does nothing and actually seems to be a jab at me. But that's fine, the president will be the better man.

Corindia wrote:

Even if we attack first they'll have plenty of time to fire off rounds at Seoul.

I know this. But in order for the casualties to be acceptable, they would have to attack first.