by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .2,1492,1502,1512,1522,1532,1542,155. . .2,1612,162»

Al-Zuweeiyah wrote:Double Standard:/
1. Penkovstvo's land was not cleared when Hesse invaded it, why suddenly when i invaded someone who has CTE i get called out?
2. When Hesse invaded Penkovstvo (by what you said it was unclaimed), no one roleplayed as him
3. So now were ignoring passed CA legislation? You passed a CA legislation a few days ago without mentioning/notifying anyone in this RMB. And to add-you were the only one voting

Double standards at it's finest, i expected this to be honest xd

This is a very stupid comeback

1- Penskovo didn’t respond to an activity poll so his land was technically open. The only reason why it was not deleted was because the Penskovo government was being artificially held up by Novanuki

2- I am not all seeing and I can miss things. Especially considering the fact that Hesse’s invasion happened right around the raid on the EO and my continued work on the space rp. I was focused on other things. If you saw it, why didn’t you bring it to my attention then? What can I do about it now? That was over 100 days ago

3- It is not my job to report CA legislation. It is Bulgaristans. Perhaps you should have paid more attention to the CA

Slavic Bavaria wrote:This is a very stupid comeback

1- Penskovo didn’t respond to an activity poll so his land was technically open. The only reason why it was not deleted was because the Penskovo government was being artificially held up by Novanuki

2- I am not all seeing and I can miss things. Especially considering the fact that Hesse’s invasion happened right around the raid on the EO and my continued work on the space rp. I was focused on other things. If you saw it, why didn’t you bring it to my attention then? What can I do about it now? That was over 100 days ago

3- It is not my job to report CA legislation. It is Bulgaristans. Perhaps you should have paid more attention to the CA

1. You didn't make any activity poll since February, even though it is your job to do so. Constavia CTE'd after returning with a roleplay post, If Penskovo's land was technically open due to that reason, Constavia should have been subject to the same rules as any other unclaimed territory

2. Excuses, it is your job to be active on the RMB, especially regarding roleplay matters. Most of the wars i waged are mostly after wars your bros waged. His invasion is considered okay while I'm not, where have i seen this?

3. It is your job to notify other nations if a resolution is at vote, not the minister. And i quote the jobdesk of the Minister:

    “Minister of The Assembly is a selected Citizen's Assembly member nation that serves as a representative and ambassador, reporting to The EO on passed or defeated laws.”

Even if it was not said in the Constitution the president, the president should notify nations of a resolution at vote, as that what i did when i was Assembly President. Perhaps you should have read more about the Constitution Article 27.

This is what i say a "stupid comeback"

You still haven't gave me an answer why my CA legislation is ignored/not considered part of the rp... You are overextending your power to fit the needs of your brothers instead the region as a whole. The only time you'll get to consider a passed CA legislation as null/avoidable is by a joint session of both The Tribunal and High Council, which was not held.

    “3- Casus Belli is no longer in the rule books your justification does not matter”

    “Casus Belli rule that is no longer in the rule books”

I'm just pissed a legislation i wrote and was passed democratically is considered not part of the rp because of a rule book you wrote and passed in the CA with only 1 vote (to add you were the only one voting)

Al-Zuweeiyah wrote:You still haven't gave me an answer why my CA legislation is ignored/not considered part of the rp... You are overextending your power to fit the needs of your brothers instead the region as a whole. The only time you'll get to consider a passed CA legislation as null/avoidable is by a joint session of both The Tribunal and High Council, which was not held.

    “3- Casus Belli is no longer in the rule books your justification does not matter”

    “Casus Belli rule that is no longer in the rule books”

I'm just pissed a legislation i wrote and was passed democratically is considered not part of the rp because of a rule book you wrote and passed in the CA with only 1 vote (to add you were the only one voting)

The CA can strike down its own legislation, also if you don’t want stuff happening in the CA you don’t like, maybe you should check it.

Also article 27 never says the president has to, and if you did or not does not hold any legal weight.

I did not even know of Hesse’s invasion and if you did and you did not report it. It’s your fault . Or maybe you let it slide…so you could do the same. Slavic Bavaria actually has stuff to do so if he missed a couple posts you need to give him some slack.

Old Order Of Bubba wrote:The CA can strike down its own legislation, also if you don’t want stuff happening in the CA you don’t like, maybe you should check it.

Also article 27 never says the president has to, and if you did or not does not hold any legal weight.

I did not even know of Hesse’s invasion and if you did and you did not report it. It’s your fault . Or maybe you let it slide…so you could do the same. Slavic Bavaria actually has stuff to do so if he missed a couple posts you need to give him some slack.

Also your war with Hesse you waged, so no your wars are not our fault.

Al-Zuweeiyah Constavia has been removed from the map so you may now invade him legally.

Al-Zuweeiyah Casus Belli was a very stupid piece of legislation. The entire point of it was to outline "acceptable" reasons to invade someone, which is dumb enough on it's own. Why should I have to provide a reason? Why does the reason matter? But that is besides the point, because literally no war has ever not been denied based on Casus Belli. Any reason has been deemed acceptable, so the rule is completely useless and fails do what it was meant to do. It will not be missed

Al-Zuweeiyah

Because I now actually know of Hesse’s illegal invasion the land has been changed back to Penskovo.

Hesse Union, may now begin invasion if he can dodge his ban.

calm down everybody

NEW BENKIANS wrote:calm down everybody

Go back to 4chan kid.

Old Order Of Bubba wrote:Go back to 4chan kid.

wth is 4chan

NEW BENKIANS wrote:wth is 4chan

An elite hacker obsessed with boxxy

Lewayin wrote:An elite hacker obsessed with boxxy

oh that website i dont care about it

NEW BENKIANS wrote:oh that website i dont care about it

Pools closed

NEW BENKIANS wrote:wth is 4chan

What your grandfather is on

Old Order Of Bubba wrote:What your grandfather is on

he is dead since 3 years :(

Old Order Of Bubba wrote:

I did not even know of Hesse’s invasion and if you did and you did not report it. It’s your fault . Or maybe you let it slide…so you could do the same. Slavic Bavaria actually has stuff to do so if he missed a couple posts you need to give him some slack.

How is it my fault? I assumed he already told you or Slavic Bavaria before invading Penkovstvo, since most wars Hesse waged on npc are either played by you or slavic Bavaria. I assumed at least one of you would play as npc and make it easy on him or let it slide due to him being your being sibling.

Slavic Bavaria wrote:Al-Zuweeiyah Casus Belli was a very stupid piece of legislation. The entire point of it was to outline "acceptable" reasons to invade someone, which is dumb enough on it's own. Why should I have to provide a reason? Why does the reason matter? But that is besides the point, because literally no war has ever not been denied based on Casus Belli. Any reason has been deemed acceptable, so the rule is completely useless and fails do what it was meant to do. It will not be missed

Because that's what worlds politics and warfare is, it's not fictional Warhammer, CoD type, this game is and always has politics. Every wars must have a reasoning/justification before sending men to die, that reasoning gave those troops morale to believe what is right on why they are fighting. No wars was denied because no one used an unacceptable justification, to my surprise anyways, i purposely didn't put "Conquest" in the unacceptable section (even though in real life it is unacceptable) because this particular roleplay only knows wars than diplomacy. I'll still use it and continue to encourage people are experienced in diplomacy to use it.

And to reply to both you and Bubba's rmb post:
The CA can strike down resolutions if a majority of vote happened, only one voting doesn't make it a majority.

(Sorry if there are some Grammar Mistakes)

Slavic Bavaria wrote:Al-Zuweeiyah Constavia has been removed from the map so you may now invade him legally.

Do i need to redo all that 1 day of rmb postings? Or my progress before this argument stays the same?

Post self-deleted by Al-Zuweeiyah.

Al-Zuweeiyah wrote:How is it my fault? I assumed he already told you or Slavic Bavaria before invading Penkovstvo, since most wars Hesse waged on npc are either played by you or slavic Bavaria. I assumed at least one of you would play as npc and make it easy on him or let it slide due to him being your being sibling.

Because that's what worlds politics and warfare is, it's not fictional Warhammer, CoD type, this game is and always has politics. Every wars must have a reasoning/justification before sending men to die, that reasoning gave those troops morale to believe what is right on why they are fighting. No wars was denied because no one used an unacceptable justification, to my surprise anyways, i purposely didn't put "Conquest" in the unacceptable section (even though in real life it is unacceptable) because this particular roleplay only knows wars than diplomacy. I'll still use it and continue to encourage people are experienced in diplomacy to use it.

And to reply to both you and Bubba's rmb post:
The CA can strike down resolutions if a majority of vote happened, only one voting doesn't make it a majority.

(Sorry if there are some Grammar Mistakes)

Do i need to redo all that 1 day of rmb postings? Or my progress before this argument stays the same?

Actually Hesse never told us and no one role played for him so no we were not aware, also one vote if it is 100% is a majority.

Al-Zuweeiyah wrote:

Because that's what worlds politics and warfare is, it's not fictional Warhammer, CoD type, this game is and always has politics. Every wars must have a reasoning/justification before sending men to die, that reasoning gave those troops morale to believe what is right on why they are fighting. No wars was denied because no one used an unacceptable justification, to my surprise anyways, i purposely didn't put "Conquest" in the unacceptable section (even though in real life it is unacceptable) because this particular roleplay only knows wars than diplomacy. I'll still use it and continue to encourage people are experienced in diplomacy to use it.

I see what you’re saying but I don’t see why it has to be mandatory or why it requires an entire stinking factbook. The entire thing can be summarized as “Please provide a reason to why you are invading someone”

Al-Zuweeiyah wrote:Do i need to redo all that 1 day of rmb postings? Or my progress before this argument stays the same?

That’s between you and whoever rps for you personally I don’t really care either way.

Post self-deleted by The Dotiria.

I am finally back with the milk

The Dotiria wrote:I am finally back with the milk

Did you bring the cookies?

UltimaWeapon wrote:Did you bring the cookies?

Yes I brought everything back from my journey to get the great estemmed milk

Is it whole milk or 2% because I don’t drink 2%

«12. . .2,1492,1502,1512,1522,1532,1542,155. . .2,1612,162»

Advertisement