Commonwealth of LibertyBoard

The azikorian empire wrote:

Keep watering me with your liberal tears, thanks 😎

like i'm chill with not removing Andrew Jackson

but like I feel like we should have a woman on something ya know?

Enchanted Oasis wrote:

It astonishes me how in 2019 we still don't have a woman on a bill nor a woman President. Not even a female Vice President.

I find it funny that India had a Female Prime Minister before most of the west have Female anything

The Confederate Prussian Empire wrote:

| Seth: | "I am asking you though."

| He teases her. |

| Renske: | "And I say...I'm not fussed either way."

Astarina wrote:

We've had all three, if you exchange President with PM and VP with Deputy PM

😎

*sigh*

we'll get them one day. hopefully sooner rather than later. clearly, the US is ready for one considering a woman one the popular vote in the most recent election
>~<

Amsterwald wrote:

A SOLUTION FOR THE PEOPLE
WITH REGARD TO THE CARTOGRAPHY DEBATE

So that neither side gets exactly what they want, but their goals are acknowledged.

We're all tired of weaponized mentions and regional telegrams, so let's put a rightful end to it.

Instead of having a small group or council of people that vote on land expansions in some sort of cartography office—as clearly, the issue is one of corruption, and it's hard to find truly non-partisan players to fill such roles—it best suits the region's interests if, to weed out corruption once and for all, we have public votes on land expansions and the ascension of players into major map spots. That would be a system that denies bureaucracy and actually supports the will of the people. It would, at last, put an end to the debate over the past few days—and eliminate any corruption that existed in the cartography department. The best solution for the public is a system that gives the public legitimate power.

I will begin now writing a more detailed form of this compromise into a bill to be proposed to the Senate. Any feedback is much appreciated.

I think that the problem right now is revolving around personal vendetta's, a public vote on these issues would just intensify it and clog our votes forever. o.o

The Shining Purple Light wrote:

I think that the problem right now is revolving around personal vendetta's, a public vote on these issues would just intensify it and clog our votes forever. o.o

A compromise was found btw ^~^

Paramountica wrote:

A compromise was found btw ^~^

Cool.

When it comes to the dollar bills thing, it honestly makes no difference to me, it’s currency with very, very, very dead people on it. There’s really no political message held within it at all, it’s a currency.

Women should not vote

Men should not vote

The only fair way is to put my pet chicken named Clyde into a box with multiple pieces of bread. Each one will correlate to a candidate, and whatever one Clyde picks wins

Thank you, I am Sisu

Astarina wrote:

| Renske: | "Sure, if that's what you want."

| Seth: | "What is it that you want though, Renske?"

| He says to her softly, truly wanting to know her thoughts. |

Sisuvia wrote:

Women should not vote

Men should not vote

The only fair way is to put my pet chicken named Clyde into a box with multiple pieces of bread. Each one will correlate to a candidate, and whatever one Clyde picks wins

Thank you, I am Sisu

Well I mean

Clyde is probably a very smart Chicken so i put my support my behind this

The Shining Purple Light wrote:

It'd be lit if our dollar bills were actually like, identifiable without looking hard, like Canadian dollars.
And you know Canadian dollars aren't tearable which is wack.

Canada's are color coded too. Much easier to differentiate lmao.

Sisuvia wrote:

Clyde thanks you
But what if a woman doesn't get the nomination?

She'll vote Green, the madwoman. O<O

Liberalina wrote:

like i'm chill with not removing Andrew Jackson

but like I feel like we should have a woman on something ya know?

I feel like the faces on the bills should absolutely depend on merit. A woman shouldn't have a bill just because she's a woman, yeah? The same should go for a man. I'm not fond of the idea of taking off Jackson—who helped fight off the British in the War of 1812, finished paying of Revolutionary War debts and repaired our relationship with the United Kingdom—and replacing him with a woman just because of the gender disparity.

But that's, of course, just my opinion.