Post

Great wen wrote:

Yes, I took PIE e-grade roots and deleted suffixes. How did you know? Does it look too PIE? I was aiming for Old Chinese vibes

heg hab hegʔ indyo ewropo grəʔs podʔ 'e' nem, wər peg qley. tu phrug kwot thoyg gnew? həgʔ indyo ewropo grəʔs te kwek tong? heg hegʔ grəʔs kwek tong stərb
heːk haːp heːk˥˧ indjo eu̯ropo ɡ̥ʲə˨ʔə˧ poːt˥˧ e nem ǀ u̯ɚ peːk ʕɨlei̯ ǁ tu pʲṳːk˩ kwɔt˥ to̤ːi̯k˩ ↗ ɡ̥ɨneu̯ ǁ hɨːk˥˧ indjo eu̯ropo ɡ̥ʲɨ˨ʔɨ˧ te˥ kwek˥ toŋ˥ ǁ heːk˥ heːk˥˧ ɡ̥ʲɨ˨ʔɨ˧ kwek˥ toŋ˥ (s)tɚːp˥
ཧག༌ཧབ༌ཧགའ༌ཨིན༌དྱོ༌ཨཽ༌རོ༌པོ༌གྲྀའས༌པོདའ༌ཨ༌ནམ༌། ཝྀར༌པག༌ཟལཻ༌། ཏུ༌ཕྲུག༌ཀྭོཏ༌ཐོཡག༌གནཽ༌། ཧྀགའ༌ཨིན༌དྱོ༌ཨཽ༌རོ༌པོ༌གྲྀའས༌ཏ༌ཀྭཀ༌ཏོང༌། ཧག༌ཧགའ༌གྲའས༌ཀྭཀ༌ཏོང༌སཏྲྀབ༌།

Ah, cool concept! think it was the kwos in a question sentence that did it, as well as just something about the distribution of consonants. Looking at the IPA it most definitely does not appear too PIE.

Context • Report

Post

Region: Council of Constructed Languages