Confederacy of Allied StatesBoard

Scotatrova wrote:

*cough*saystheonethatannexedtherestofunclaimedEastAsia*cough*
:P

I was talking about Africa. Im not a imperialist i just happened to stick a flag on the lands I walked.

Mes wrote:

DAMMIT TARAZED YOUR ON MY SIDE

Doesn't mean I have to support everything you do/say XD

Tarazed wrote:

Doesn't mean I have to support everything you do/say XD

YOU DO! Haha (Jk)

Parzal wrote:

But...I'm not in the DSU...nor am I Socialist

Oh..If so I wasn't referring to you :D

[quote=scotatrova;16873923]In other words
NEWTON, AMERIKA, JORD, SAHEL, NG
+ Vicar?

Mes wrote:

Thats good for him bad for the DSU. The DSU fears ISTP influence hmm? haha. I'm doing this so you imperialists that claims yourself as "Democratic Socialist"
could hop off his and his neighbors genitals. (JK) Did you actually tried to get on it though? (Riding Get it? No?)

You know, I couldn't care less that you and the Greater African Republic unified. The Partition is still proceeding, regardless of your activities on the continent. Also, I think it's a tad hypocritical that you stood by the GAR against our "imperialism," yet you technically imperialized most of Aydean's former territory.

Amerika i wrote:

You know, I couldn't care less that you and the Greater African Republic unified. The Partition is still proceeding, regardless of your activities on the continent. Also, I think it's a tad hypocritical that you stood by the GAR against our "imperialism," yet you technically imperialized most of Aydean's former territory.

*sips tea*
Guess I keep the lemon away from my cut or else it will....BURN
.....
*continues to sip tea loudly*
...Lovely day

Parzal wrote:

Still TECHNICALLY imperialism...

At least...they were "declared...Who knows...maybe they were annexed but Mesian censorship made the destruction seem "anarchist"?
*continues to sip tea and squirts lemon in eye*
...Should have kept that away...

Mes wrote:

"Imperialism" is when you take over someones land and trying to influence their land to be under your domain but in that case the land is owned by none but by anarchists.

So you have said.....but that's none of my business...
*refills tea*

Mes wrote:

"Imperialism" is when you take over someones land and trying to influence their land to be under your domain but in that case the land is owned by none but by anarchists.

Peoples are still living on the land though. And by that extension, those people, despite being "anarchists" or "barbarians" they still own that land, and you've basically taken that land and exterted your influence over it. So again, technically imperialism.

Parzal wrote:

Well, the Native American's were, in a sense, anarchists, they had no central form of government, well, some of them, some of them did have a central form of government, but either way it was considered imperialism.

^
Add this to my argument.