Alliance Of Armed NationsBoard

Drangoniov wrote:

Asi's got a ton of territory.

I'm not saying he doesn't, but compared to what he had he has lost massive amounts to Avan, who already had a large amount. Asi's territory is not enough to sustain his population as much of it is tundra, a large amount will need to be farmland and this leaves little space for industry.

This is the original map.

https://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=2&ik=7a601473e9&view=fimg&th=149e3564f5c2df24&attid=0.1&disp=inline&realattid=f_i2w8tthb0&safe=1&attbid=ANGjdJ-qQA7QPfWAIweYeOLqpRJfA05V4h81e2Ka51iTIocadImZmaEmacvWZxylMKdByVLYUjBLx5wP8R4K1uH0OxxzGKIIY3xrqEeO7KYONAzaXXUB7RadrHstwt8&ats=1417150644196&rm=149e3564f5c2df24&zw&sz=w1000-h557

This is the new map.

http://s27.postimg.org/xkldoneqa/maps_world_map_02_copy.jpg

Bougheyia wrote:

That is not the new map. I worked on the new map with New-N and Godfathers. The new map included Mikumo and Zargabad was made smaller.

That's the map that was where NN said it was.

New-netherealm wrote:

1. The old map didn't save, I threw this together.
2. Asi has plenty of land.
3. Mikumu will be added.
4. Who's giving up land first?

I already posted a for rules for giving up land.

If you cease to exist for let's say two weeks, your're territory is threatened. Or if you are inactive for a period of time (a month?) you're territory is threatened. That's not to say that nations can take your territory arbitrarily, but that it can be given to new nations that arrive. This way there is an incentive to be active while allowing for future growth and declines.

Remember we can also add land to the map it isn't exactly permanent

We can just sorta dump a metric sh|tton of dirt into the ocean and make an island

Ism wrote:

That could heavily alter the way ocean currents flow though. It could even alter weather patterns depending on how large the new landmass is.

It would also cause massive flooding, depending on the size it may actually cause there to be less land than before.

Ism wrote:

Score one for science!

Woooooh

Ism wrote:

Also we really should develop some sort of canonical chain of events. Personally, so as to avoid too much confusion, I believe we should avoid using real world entities in our nations if possible. However, using references in factbooks and dispatches and such to help the reader is I think acceptable.

Well, for my nation I have to. So, let's say australia broke up after the Antarctican war then Alcatrazin took it over.

Ism wrote:

Perhaps, we will have to wait and see how he wants to do this.

Maybe the Economy collapsed after the Antarctican War causing a revolution and they named their nation in honor of Australia once being a prison colony.