NiamarkBoard

Gatsbie wrote:

Hey folks! Prolip is a new Nation on our region, and is a friend of mine.

We're glad to have them with us!

Gatsbie wrote:

Prolip, Gravskall and Anglo-Terr are some friends of mine. Be nice to them.

o7

Oi Barbaroi wrote:

WA:Protecting Native Prairies and Grasslands

My thoughts:

My main concern is that this proposal may not do enough for its intended purpose, or that it may provide for too many loopholes.

My recommendation is to vote "FOR" this proposal, though I wish it was stronger. What do you all think?

I'm against this because its a way to stole money from Nations of the world. Thats a subject for each nation, not for a global assembly.

Lycos wrote:

A non-edgy post from Suk? Truly we are blessed today

Pu...pu...pu.... purify ?

SuKbErIa NeWs

Gatsbie wrote:

Thats why I'm thinking about leave WA. This type of decision should be from the State, not the assembly. The WA should rule just about the relations between countrys.

(If you do leave the WA for roleplay reasons like the above, you can make a puppet so that you can keep endorsing your neighbors)

Gatsbie wrote:

Thats why I'm thinking about leave WA. This type of decision should be from the State, not the assembly. The WA should rule just about the relations between countrys.

Being in the WA doesn't affect your nation stats or anything.

The most important thing about the WA isn't the laws it passes, but the security of the region that comes through endorsements. Players behind computer screens are able to use the WA to disrupt or outright take over regions. Endorsements are what keep Niamark safe from these kinds of attacks, should we be targeted. The more we endorse, the more secure Niamark is.

Oi Barbaroi wrote:

Being in the WA doesn't affect your nation stats or anything.

The most important thing about the WA isn't the laws it passes, but the security of the region that comes through endorsements. Players behind computer screens are able to use the WA to disrupt or outright take over regions. Endorsements are what keep Niamark safe from these kinds of attacks, should we be targeted. The more we endorse, the more secure Niamark is.

That’s a good point.

Croaxi wrote:

I took a gander of a look at the current Security Council issue, and personally, I feel like it has an extremely biased tone. What are y'all's thoughts on it?

Condemn Quebecshire?

So... What do you UK bois and gals, think of the recent elections ?

WA: Protecting Convicted Voters

Frankly, I believe Article "a" is a decision that is best left to individual nations. Personally, I believe voting rights should be yielded when one commits and is convicted of a crime, breaking the public's laws and trust. Voting rights should be restored after a sentence is served, but convicted murderers, rapists, thieves, frauds, conspirators, abusers, drug dealers, traffickers, and other offenders still serving a sentence should not share the same voting rights as those they victimized. Vice versa, citizens should not be forced to share voting rights with those that victimized them and/or the public.

My recommendation is to vote "AGAINST" this proposal. Sorry Tin. What do you all think?

I got a weird message about a country (Brillstaina) has been abducting Rranacan kids and making them work in a diamond mine. and it said international issue.

New Sukberia wrote:

Yeah also, their last article clarifies that the entire thing only applies to DEMOCRATIC nations, thereby showing that the WA is a joke when it comes to authoritarian states.

"clarifies that Article a does not mandate that elections for public office be organised in any member state."

No, I think it's just saying that it's not forcing member nations to have elections.