by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .27,96627,96727,96827,969

Yes, they got most of my cards back (if not all of them back)

Hi comrades! Hope you're ready for a little bit of communist propaganda history!

When humankind emerged, it lived divided into groups called tribes, since smaller groups were doomed to fall to a variety of environmental factors such as climate and predators. Within tribes, they all worked together and shared their resources among each other. Their technology was extremely primitive, but advanced enough to feed the tribe.

As the population grew, old methods of farming became obsolete. More mouths demanded better technology, so people invented the plough and other tools to help them feed each other, domesticated horses and cows, etc. Different access to tools enabled labor specialisation and prompted the development of exchange as a social institution. At first, goods were exchanged for goods, but such system became unsustainable in the long run and was overrun by the new system: money.

Unfortunately, people are not all like each other. One is more productive than another, can work more efficiently of for longer, thus making it logical to let them have more lands to plough. That meant some people became dependent on others to the point they fell into debt and had to sell themselves into slavery. This is the point where social stratification and class struggle began.

The slave owning class was interested in expanding their territories and keeping slaves subservient, so they invented the state, which serves the ruling class to this day. States waged horrific wars with intent of enslaving more people and expanding the influence of a group of slave owners in charge of it.

As a result of class struggle, slave owners retracted their rights to have other people as property and were defeated. Many nations straight up missed this stage of development. Regardless, the world advanced into feudalism: a system where the class of serfs owned some means of production like farm animals or tools, but didn't have a right to own land or some of products of their labor: those belonged to to the class of lords.

The new social formation had its own fight: serfs against lords. As technology advanced, accumulating capital became easier, so some serfs became petit-bourgeois, but weren't allowed to expand by the rules of feudalism.

The struggle of petit-bourgeoisie against the lords culminated in many bourgeois revolutions, such as the French one. New economic system called capitalism valued property rights for all, equality and fraternity. But how would it be possible to force the emerging proletariat into factories without actual force? Easy. Make it impossible to feed yourself without working. And so the bourgeoisie did that.

Yet another round of class struggle began: the working class against the bourgeoisie. It is still going on, with the bourgeoisie having the monopoly on capital and the state on their side, while the workers resort to unionising and revolting. Eventually, this fight will end with the victory of workers, just like any other round of class struggle.

Istastioner wrote:Yes, they got most of my cards back (if not all of them back)

I've gotten a few doubles, but that will probably get fixed. But even if not, that's good, an extra cards!

Arctic Lands wrote:Hi comrades! Hope you're ready for a little bit of communist propaganda history!

When humankind emerged, it lived divided into groups called tribes, since smaller groups were doomed to fall to a variety of environmental factors such as climate and predators. Within tribes, they all worked together and shared their resources among each other. Their technology was extremely primitive, but advanced enough to feed the tribe.

As the population grew, old methods of farming became obsolete. More mouths demanded better technology, so people invented the plough and other tools to help them feed each other, domesticated horses and cows, etc. Different access to tools enabled labor specialisation and prompted the development of exchange as a social institution. At first, goods were exchanged for goods, but such system became unsustainable in the long run and was overrun by the new system: money.

Unfortunately, people are not all like each other. One is more productive than another, can work more efficiently of for longer, thus making it logical to let them have more lands to plough. That meant some people became dependent on others to the point they fell into debt and had to sell themselves into slavery. This is the point where social stratification and class struggle began.

The slave owning class was interested in expanding their territories and keeping slaves subservient, so they invented the state, which serves the ruling class to this day. States waged horrific wars with intent of enslaving more people and expanding the influence of a group of slave owners in charge of it.

As a result of class struggle, slave owners retracted their rights to have other people as property and were defeated. Many nations straight up missed this stage of development. Regardless, the world advanced into feudalism: a system where the class of serfs owned some means of production like farm animals or tools, but didn't have a right to own land or some of products of their labor: those belonged to to the class of lords.

The new social formation had its own fight: serfs against lords. As technology advanced, accumulating capital became easier, so some serfs became petit-bourgeois, but weren't allowed to expand by the rules of feudalism.

The struggle of petit-bourgeoisie against the lords culminated in many bourgeois revolutions, such as the French one. New economic system called capitalism valued property rights for all, equality and fraternity. But how would it be possible to force the emerging proletariat into factories without actual force? Easy. Make it impossible to feed yourself without working. And so the bourgeoisie did that.

Yet another round of class struggle began: the working class against the bourgeoisie. It is still going on, with the bourgeoisie having the monopoly on capital and the state on their side, while the workers resort to unionising and revolting. Eventually, this fight will end with the victory of workers, just like any other round of class struggle.

I just LOVE the smell of communist propaganda!

Iceagea wrote:Nope, electing Susan Hall would have been embarrassing considering the awful track record of the Tories across the UK.

Not really. Both parties are almost exactly the same, with the tories being the least worst.

What about their track record is awful?

Arctic Lands wrote:Hi comrades! Hope you're ready for a little bit of communist propaganda history!

When humankind emerged, it lived divided into groups called tribes, since smaller groups were doomed to fall to a variety of environmental factors such as climate and predators. Within tribes, they all worked together and shared their resources among each other. Their technology was extremely primitive, but advanced enough to feed the tribe.

As the population grew, old methods of farming became obsolete. More mouths demanded better technology, so people invented the plough and other tools to help them feed each other, domesticated horses and cows, etc. Different access to tools enabled labor specialisation and prompted the development of exchange as a social institution. At first, goods were exchanged for goods, but such system became unsustainable in the long run and was overrun by the new system: money.

Unfortunately, people are not all like each other. One is more productive than another, can work more efficiently of for longer, thus making it logical to let them have more lands to plough. That meant some people became dependent on others to the point they fell into debt and had to sell themselves into slavery. This is the point where social stratification and class struggle began.

The slave owning class was interested in expanding their territories and keeping slaves subservient, so they invented the state, which serves the ruling class to this day. States waged horrific wars with intent of enslaving more people and expanding the influence of a group of slave owners in charge of it.

As a result of class struggle, slave owners retracted their rights to have other people as property and were defeated. Many nations straight up missed this stage of development. Regardless, the world advanced into feudalism: a system where the class of serfs owned some means of production like farm animals or tools, but didn't have a right to own land or some of products of their labor: those belonged to to the class of lords.

The new social formation had its own fight: serfs against lords. As technology advanced, accumulating capital became easier, so some serfs became petit-bourgeois, but weren't allowed to expand by the rules of feudalism.

The struggle of petit-bourgeoisie against the lords culminated in many bourgeois revolutions, such as the French one. New economic system called capitalism valued property rights for all, equality and fraternity. But how would it be possible to force the emerging proletariat into factories without actual force? Easy. Make it impossible to feed yourself without working. And so the bourgeoisie did that.

Yet another round of class struggle began: the working class against the bourgeoisie. It is still going on, with the bourgeoisie having the monopoly on capital and the state on their side, while the workers resort to unionising and revolting. Eventually, this fight will end with the victory of workers, just like any other round of class struggle.

This is all very interesting, but what about the droid attack on the Wookies?

I just allowed cheerleader boys in skirts.

Tungstan wrote:This is all very interesting, but what about the droid attack on the Wookies?

It's all the fault of the Empire's imperialism. (heck, I forgor to explain imperialism in the text wall, that one's a bad propaganda piece, maybe it's just history).

Arctic Lands wrote:Hi comrades! Hope you're ready for a little bit of communist propaganda history!

When humankind emerged, it lived divided into groups called tribes, since smaller groups were doomed to fall to a variety of environmental factors such as climate and predators. Within tribes, they all worked together and shared their resources among each other. Their technology was extremely primitive, but advanced enough to feed the tribe.

As the population grew, old methods of farming became obsolete. More mouths demanded better technology, so people invented the plough and other tools to help them feed each other, domesticated horses and cows, etc. Different access to tools enabled labor specialisation and prompted the development of exchange as a social institution. At first, goods were exchanged for goods, but such system became unsustainable in the long run and was overrun by the new system: money.

Unfortunately, people are not all like each other. One is more productive than another, can work more efficiently of for longer, thus making it logical to let them have more lands to plough. That meant some people became dependent on others to the point they fell into debt and had to sell themselves into slavery. This is the point where social stratification and class struggle began.

The slave owning class was interested in expanding their territories and keeping slaves subservient, so they invented the state, which serves the ruling class to this day. States waged horrific wars with intent of enslaving more people and expanding the influence of a group of slave owners in charge of it.

As a result of class struggle, slave owners retracted their rights to have other people as property and were defeated. Many nations straight up missed this stage of development. Regardless, the world advanced into feudalism: a system where the class of serfs owned some means of production like farm animals or tools, but didn't have a right to own land or some of products of their labor: those belonged to to the class of lords.

The new social formation had its own fight: serfs against lords. As technology advanced, accumulating capital became easier, so some serfs became petit-bourgeois, but weren't allowed to expand by the rules of feudalism.

The struggle of petit-bourgeoisie against the lords culminated in many bourgeois revolutions, such as the French one. New economic system called capitalism valued property rights for all, equality and fraternity. But how would it be possible to force the emerging proletariat into factories without actual force? Easy. Make it impossible to feed yourself without working. And so the bourgeoisie did that.

Yet another round of class struggle began: the working class against the bourgeoisie. It is still going on, with the bourgeoisie having the monopoly on capital and the state on their side, while the workers resort to unionising and revolting. Eventually, this fight will end with the victory of workers, just like any other round of class struggle.

Слава! Люблю это!

Bon Bon BON
Guess who's back
Mardovo

hate it when i run over mr beast in my semi. all the kids yell at me

Turenia wrote:Not really. Both parties are almost exactly the same, with the tories being the least worst.

What about their track record is awful?

“Both the same”

Absolute nonsense if you know anything about British politics.

One party plays into the far right handbook, crying “woke” and “Islamists” while defying human rights courts to send as many non-white people as they can to a corrupt dictatorship in Africa in a plan not dissimilar to one nearly deployed by the most racist country the world ever saw, trying to make it harder for people to oppose them to vote, clamping down on protest rights, and treating minority groups that make up less than 10% of the population like they’re some massive threat.

The other party doesn’t make any real change and doubles back on every promise.

These are not the same, and the Tories are certainly not the least worst option, short of far right parties like UKIP, BNP and sects of Reform UK they are by far the worst option.

Honestly, the gall to call Iceagea’s take embarrassing while praising a failed party like the Tories just days after they lost half their councillors in local elections and performed worse than the Lib Dems.

Honestly, voting Tories after everything they’ve messed up, be it Brexit, Covid or living up to basic standards of Human Rights is truly an embarrassment. “What about their track record is awful” indeed…

«12. . .27,96627,96727,96827,969

Advertisement