Post

Shanlix wrote:

Wouldn't it be better to scrap it all together and replace it with a resolution that is build more concrete than GA #357? As it stand now that resolution is more about suggesting good intend then actual enforced policy, so for it to be replaced with a proposal that has a harder approach would be more favorable in my opinion.

WA resolutions are never enforceable. National Sovereignty takes precedent.

That is outside the point though. The main argument for repealing is to quote: "replacement resolution is necessary to provide member nations with the comprehensive framework and international cooperation needed to drive the switch in energy reliance from fossil fuels to clean energy sources"

You don't need to repeal the resolution to provide frameworks. A separate framework for renewable energy would have sufficed. The worse you have to do is make amendments on GA #357. Reading up GA #357 I found that it has no fundamental failings in terms of direction. Repealing scraps the act and gives no guarantee that any replacement act will be pushed through.