The World Assembly
World Assembly Proposals
The following are proposals for WA resolutions. Any WA member nation with at least two endorsements can make a proposal, but it will only become a resolution (to be voted on by the entire WA) if it is approved by at least 6% of WA Regional Delegates.
As the WA currently has 709 Regional Delegates, a proposal needs 43 approvals to achieve quorum.
View: All proposals | General Assembly | Security Council
General Assembly Proposal
ID: contriu_1789594419
International Civil Protection and Disaster Response
Proposed by:
Contriu
The World Assembly,
Recognizing that large-scale emergencies and disasters can cause extensive loss of life, injury, displacement, environmental damage, destruction of infrastructure, and disruption of essential services;
Concerned that inadequate preparedness in one member nation may, in certain circumstances, increase risks to neighboring nations or otherwise create consequences extending beyond its jurisdiction;
Seeking to establish common minimum standards for civil protection and disaster preparedness while allowing members to determine how those standards are implemented;
Hereby enacts as follows:
1. National Preparedness
1. Each member shall maintain sufficient civil protection or emergency management capacity for large-scale emergencies.
2. Each member shall maintain risk assessments, emergency plans, warning systems, trained personnel, exercises, public emergency communications, and coordination among relevant authorities.
2. Risk Reduction
1. Members shall integrate disaster risk reduction into relevant public planning according to identified risks and national circumstances.
2. Where relevant, this shall address infrastructure, healthcare, schools, utilities, communications, transport, and land use.
3. Members shall maintain reasonable measures for infrastructure protection, service continuity, recovery, and reconstruction.
3. Public Warning
1. Each member shall maintain capabilities to warn persons affected by significant emergency threats.
2. Any effective technology may be used, including cellular, radio, television, satellite, sirens, applications, and meteorological or seismic systems.
3. Warnings shall, where applicable, identify the hazard, affected area, recommended actions, issue time, and updates or termination.
4. Warning systems shall be reasonably accessible to persons with disabilities and persons who do not sufficiently understand the primary official language.
4. Protection and Response
1. Members shall respect fundamental rights, dignity, and non-discrimination.
2. Plans shall address, where relevant, persons with disabilities, children, older persons, persons requiring medical care, displaced persons, language barriers, isolated communities, and other groups identified by risk assessment.
3. Plans shall provide, as appropriate, for evacuation, shelter, food, water, medical care, communication, protection, and family reunification.
4. Members shall maintain shelters and evacuation plans where required by risk, measures for animals under human responsibility, and recovery plans for essential services.
5. International Cooperation
1. Members shall, where practicable, cooperate in prevention, preparedness, response, scientific exchange, and recovery.
2. An affected member may request international assistance. Members shall consider requests according to their capacities; no member shall be required to deploy resources without consent.
3. Members shall coordinate assistance and share relevant emergency and disaster-risk information where this may facilitate response or address international consequences, subject to reasonable security and privacy protections.
6. World Civil Protection and Disaster Response Organization
1. The World Civil Protection and Disaster Response Organization (WCPDRO) is established as a World Assembly body for international civil protection and disaster response cooperation.
2. The WCPDRO shall coordinate assistance requests and offers, facilitate emergency communications and information exchange, support international operations, provide technical assistance, promote exercises and scientific cooperation, and publish reports.
3. The WCPDRO shall respect national sovereignty and shall not compel acceptance of assistance, deployment of resources, or adoption of particular emergency measures.
7. International Civil Protection Fund
1. An International Civil Protection Fund is established under the WCPDRO to support risk reduction, preparedness, response, recovery, and technical assistance.
2. Each member shall contribute according to its economic capacity.
3. Additional voluntary contributions may be made.
4. Resources shall prioritize members with insufficient resources and support risk assessments, warning systems, training, resilience, shelters, and recovery.
8. Monitoring and Review
1. Members shall periodically report to the WCPDRO on risks, preparedness, warning capabilities, and progress.
2. The WCPDRO shall evaluate and publish implementation assessments.
3. Significant deficiencies shall first result in recommendations and a correction period, with assistance where practicable.
4. The World Assembly shall oversee the WCPDRO and periodically review this resolution, including after a major disaster or significant change in risk or technology.
Approval Status: Lacking Support: Requires 43 approvals (5 — The Hard Part, Nolaneia, Kesoia, Hitori Gotoh Bocchi, Polish-Kremlin)
Voting Ends:
World Census Analysis: Pending
General Assembly Proposal
ID: federated_nordland_1789601066
Workers Pritection Act
Proposed by:
Federated Nordland
Workers Protection Act
RECOGNIZING that blue collar jobs, such as mining, factorywork, and construction can lead to unnecesary harm to the employees.
WISHING to bridge the gap between the employer and employee, by ensuring economic democracy, and allowing workers to have independent controll over their lives.
HOPEFUL to bridge the state of income inequality that plagues so many regions and countries, by promoting limited worker control over national economies.
The General Assembly hereby declares:
● An Employee is described as anyone who either is willingly, forcefully, or coercively put to work in manual or technical labor.
● An Employer is described as anyone who puts an employee to work, either for, or without a wage.
● Employment is described as being actively participating in the workforce, such as deskwork, manual labor, or other forms of white and blue collar work.
In order to prevent mistreatment and abuse in these fields of Employment, the General Assembly shall enact the following:
1. No work hours should last longer than 60 Hours per-week, with extra overtime pay being allocated for work beyond the required 45 hours.
2. For minimum wage jobs, hourly wages must equal or surpass 25 Standard Monetary Units per-hour, while for full wage jobs, salaries must equal or surpass 60,000 Standard Monetary Units per-year.
3. In blue-collar jobs, there must be safety regulations and regulations to prevent unnecesary deaths. In order to achieve this goal, an international WAWSC, or World Assembly Workplace Safety Council will be formed, with delegates from each region to determine safety regulations.
4. In order to ensure stability and sustainability in the event of potential inflation or drops in industrial production caused by these changes, international subsidies will be granted to industrialized or un-advanced countries, so as to maintain production capacity.
5. The right to strike, and collective bargaining among workers will be enshrined, with proper mechanisms being placed in order to allow for strikers and employers to negotiate terms. On top of this, a prohibition of strike-busting without proper evidence a strike is deliberately aiming to sabotage the nation for no benefit of their own.
By adopting this legislation, the World Assembly reiterates its dedication to the mutual welfare of the common citizenry, and its care for the working class.
Approval Status: Lacking Support: Requires 43 approvals (4 — Nolaneia, Nuralak, Hitori Gotoh Bocchi, Polish-Kremlin)
Voting Ends:
World Census Analysis: Pending
General Assembly Proposal
ID: doxatheia_1789655150
Repeal: “World Assembly Headquarters”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #10 “World Assembly Headquarters” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
The General Assembly,
Recognizing the sympathetic efforts made in Resolution #10, which was passed with an overwhelming majority, to instate a capital city for the World Assembly;
Seeing, however, problems with having a capital city for the World Assembly, detailing them as follows;
1. Understanding that capital cities are typically those cities which are culturally, and/or politically, and/or logistically the most significant within a country, county, province or other administrative division; the World Assembly is none of these things, nor does it hold executive legislative power over its member nations, which are free to comply or not to comply with each passed resolution as they see fit, and which retain national sovereignity as established in several different ways in Resolutions #1, #2 and #3, all of which were passed by a large majority of votes;
2. Understanding also, that assigning one place as the capital city of a global organization which aims to bring peaceful cooperation between countries, is sympathetic but the wrong action to take, because it could reasonably be considered to give nations and regions more closely associated with the capital city economic, and potentially political, advantages;
3. Understanding furthermore, that in the modern day and age of mass digital communication, a single administrative center is not just undesireable, it is also unnecessary;
Repeals Resolution #10 and no longer recognizes 'WASBBRHQ' as the capital city of the World Assembly.
And ultimately wishes all World Assembly member nations a bright, independent and cooperative future.
World Census Analysis
No statistical effect.
Approval Status: Lacking Support: Requires 43 approvals (2 — Nolaneia, Polish-Kremlin)
Voting Ends:
World Census Analysis: Not required
General Assembly Proposal
ID: greater_bohimia_1789662252
Sovereign Right of Defensive Response
Proposed by: Greater Bohimia
Dear General Assembly,
The international community has traditionally understood warfare through declarations, mobilisations, and the open deployment of armed forces. Modern conflict, however, does not always announce itself so clearly. A hostile state may conduct sabotage, sponsor armed groups, attack infrastructure, blockade vital resources, violate sovereign territory, or otherwise deliberately injure another nation while refusing to formally declare war.
Our delegation believes that international law must recognise actions rather than declarations alone.
A nation should not be expected to watch its citizens die, its infrastructure burn, or its sovereignty be violated simply because the responsible government has not formally announced a state of war.
Article I Recognition of Undeclared Aggression
The General Assembly shall recognise that deliberate hostile actions may constitute aggression regardless of whether the responsible nation has issued a formal declaration of war.
Such actions may include armed incursions, deliberate attacks upon citizens or territory, sabotage of critical infrastructure, military blockades, or the deliberate use of state-controlled agents to conduct comparable hostile operations.
Article II Requirement of Evidence
A nation invoking this resolution shall be expected to possess credible and demonstrable evidence connecting the hostile actions to the accused state or its authorised agents.
Such evidence should be capable of being presented to the international community so that the principle established by this resolution cannot simply be invoked as a pretext for territorial expansion or an otherwise unprovoked war.
Article III Right of Immediate Defensive Response
Once such hostile activity has been reasonably established, the affected nation shall possess the sovereign right to employ the measures necessary to halt the attack, protect its population, and remove the continuing threat.
The defending nation shall not be required to wait for the aggressor to issue a declaration of war, nor shall it be required to endure further attacks merely to establish that hostile intentions exist.
Most importantly, the exercise of this right shall not itself be regarded as a declaration of war or an act of aggression by the defending nation.
The absence of a declaration of war by the original aggressor cannot be used as a shield behind which hostile operations may continue without consequence.
Article IV Measures Against the Aggressor
Where responsibility for such aggression has been sufficiently demonstrated, the defending nation may take military, economic, diplomatic, intelligence, or other lawful measures necessary to bring the hostile actions to an end.
The defending state shall retain substantial discretion in determining how the threat can most rapidly and effectively be terminated, provided that its actions remain directed toward ending the conflict and removing the demonstrated threat, rather than using the incident as an unlimited justification for unrelated conquest or violence.
The purpose of this provision is simple: international law should not demand that a victim fight with one hand tied behind its back while granting an aggressor the advantages of ambiguity.
Article V Emergency Powers and National Mobilisation
A nation facing such aggression shall retain the authority to mobilise its population and resources for national defence.
Governments may temporarily direct strategic industries, transportation, communications, energy production, defence manufacturing, and other infrastructure essential to national survival.
States may likewise establish military or civilian national service where necessary for defence, including service within the armed forces, emergency medicine, logistics, civil defence, transportation, and essential industry.
Article VI Principle of Sovereignty
This resolution does not seek to encourage warfare.
It seeks to remove a dangerous loophole.
An aggressor must not be permitted to conclude that it may attack another nation without consequence merely by avoiding the words declaration of war.
If a government orders hostile acts against another sovereign state, it must accept that the affected state possesses the right to defend itself.
Likewise, every nation invoking this principle must accept the responsibility of demonstrating why its actions constitute defence.
Honourable Delegates,
Peace cannot depend entirely upon terminology. Sovereignty cannot exist only until an aggressor discovers a sufficiently ambiguous method of violating it.
Approval Status: Lacking Support: Requires 43 approvals (3 — Syren Reborn, Hitori Gotoh Bocchi, Polish-Kremlin)
Voting Ends:
World Census Analysis: Pending
General Assembly Proposal
ID: aveloris_1789681721
International Scientific Cooperation Framework
Proposed by:
Aveloris
Recognizing that scientific and technological advancement contributes to the health, prosperity, and development of nations,
Acknowledging that unequal access to scientific facilities, educational opportunities, technical expertise, and research resources can hinder scientific progress,
Affirming that international cooperation can accelerate research while respecting the sovereignty and legitimate interests of Member States,
Emphasizing the peaceful applications of scientific research in healthcare, environmental protection, education, infrastructure, and economic development,
Seeking to expand opportunities for researchers and students to exchange knowledge and expertise across national borders,
The General Assembly:
1. Establishes the International Scientific Cooperation Framework (ISCF) to facilitate voluntary scientific cooperation between Member States and qualified research and educational institutions;
2. Encourages Member States to establish cooperative research programs between universities, laboratories, research institutions, and other qualified scientific organizations;
3. Encourages Member States to provide scholarships, fellowships, grants, research facilities, and other appropriate support for researchers and students participating in international scientific projects;
4. Promotes international cooperation in medicine, public health, environmental science, sustainable energy, agriculture, information technology, engineering, infrastructure, astronomy, space science, and fundamental research;
5. Encourages participating institutions to exchange non-sensitive research findings, methodologies, and scientific data where such exchange is authorized by the institutions concerned;
6. Encourages Member States possessing greater scientific resources to voluntarily provide technical assistance, training, equipment, and educational resources to Member States seeking to develop their scientific capacity;
7. Promotes international scientific conferences, research exchanges, and academic fellowships intended to facilitate the exchange of scientific knowledge and expertise;
8. Affirms that participation in the ISCF shall not require a Member State or institution to disclose classified, military, proprietary, or otherwise restricted information;
9. Affirms the right of Member States and participating institutions to determine which research projects, technologies, facilities, and information they contribute to international cooperation;
10. Encourages Member States to prioritize cooperative research whose peaceful applications may contribute to public health, environmental sustainability, education, technological development, and economic prosperity.
Approval Status: Lacking Support: Requires 43 approvals (2 — Hitori Gotoh Bocchi, Polish-Kremlin)
Voting Ends:
World Census Analysis: Pending









