by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .24,49724,49824,49924,50024,50124,50224,503. . .24,53924,540»

In the process of redoing my navy factbook. Have finished the Admiralty organization.

Thiudinanlic Flotari (Royal Navy



Allegiance: The Crown of Wellsia

Active Personnel: 28,583 (including 1,446 officers)

Reserve Personnel: 3,150

Marines: 4,863

Total: 36,596

Budget: 1,170,044,424$c

Per Capita expenditure on regulars and reserves: 20,877/41.0$c



Commander In Chief:King Himilco

The Thiudinanlic Scipharjis or Royal Navy is the maritime branch of the Wellsian Military. The official head of the Navy is the monarch who is represented by the Overlord of the Navy (Ufarwealden Flotari) who is the President of the Sea Council (Saeraed) which serves as the Admiralty. Besides the Overlord the Council is made up of the Director of Ships (Stihtere af Scips), who serves as the Naval Chief of Staff, Director of Shipbuilding (Stihtere af Scripcraeft), Director of Equipment (Stihtere af Scipforthing), and the Director of Provisions (Stihtere af
Feorm
).
The Overlord is appointed by the monarch and serves on the cabinet. He is assisted by a small staff of Rear-Admiral, Captain, 2 Midshipmen and 1 civilian secretary.
The Naval Staff is under the Director of Ships who is the highest-ranking officer in the Navy and holds the rank of Saeweard or Vice-Admiral. He has a personal staff of a Captain, Lt. Commander, Lieutenant, 2 Midshipmen, and a civilian staff of senior clerk, 2 junior clerks and 2 secretaries. Under his direct command are the Operations Division, Intelligence Division and Personnel Division.
The Operations Division coordinates all information and determines all movements in peace and dispositions of forces in war. One wall of the Operations Room is a massive digital map of the Isles that shows the locations of all Wellsian ships, and all foreign vessels as known.
The Operations Division is under the command of a Captain who is assisted by 3 Commanders, 2 Lt. Commanders, 3 Lieutenants, 4 Midshipmen and a civilian staff of 2 Senior Clerks, 3 Clerks, 2 Technicians, and a secretary.
The Intelligence Division is the largest division and is responsible for keeping tabs on all foreign naval developments, building and operations. It is subdivided into four sections. The central section is the Coordination and Records Section which compiles all information obtained by the three Analyzation Sections:
Analyzation Section 1 (AS1) is responsible for the countries on Argus, the Argean Sea and the islands off the coast.
Analyzation Section 2 (AS2) is responsible for the nations on Raedlon, the Four Passages, the North and South Mesder Seas.
Analyzation Section 3 (AS3) covers the countries of Gael, the Eterna and Southern Seas.
Each Analyzation Section is divided into a Technical Sub-section and a Personnel and Movement Sub-section.
The Coordination and Records Section is under the command of an Saeweard (OF-8) or Saewisa (OF-7) and has a staff of Commander, Lt. Commander, 2 Lieutenants, 1 Midshipmen with a civilian staff of 2 Senior Clerk, 3 Clerks, 2 Librarians, 2 Secretaries.
Each Analyzation Section is made up of a Captain, Lt. Commander, 3 Lieutenants, 5 Midshipmen, and a civilian staff of 1 Senior Clerk, 3 Clerks, 5 Technical Experts, 2 Code Breakers, 1 Secretary. Each one can also hire translators as needed.
The Personnel Division is under the Assistant Director of Ships, who holds the rank of Saeweard or Saewisa and is the second in command of the Navy. The division covers recruiting, appointments, promotions, pay, retirement and legal affairs.
Besides the Assistant Director the division has 1 rear-admiral, 3 Captains, 2 Commanders, 2 Lt. commanders. 3 Lieutenants, 1 Midshipman and a civilian staff of 3 Senior clerks, 4 clerks, 4 secretaries, 2 senior accountants, 2 accountants, 27 investigators divided into 9 three-man teams, 3 Medical Examiners and 3 Forensic Scientist.
The Naval Staff has 66 naval officers and 108 civilian employees.

The Department of Shipbuilding is under the Director of Shipbuilding a civilian appointed by the Overlord and Director of Ships to ensure that all ships and aircraft built for the navy are up to standard and follow codes. Not only is the Department responsible for new construction, but also all maintenance and updating. The Departments technical department is also responsible for either drawing all blueprints and specifications on new ships or examining those specifications and blueprints submitted by private firms, both domestic and foreign.
The Director has a Naval staff of 1 Captain, 1 Commander, 2 Lt Commanders and 3 Lieutenants. The civilian staff has 3 senior clerks, 5 clerks, 2 secretaries, 4 Mechanical Engineers, 2 Aerial Engineers, 4 draftsmen, 3 computer technicians and 12 Inspectors.
The Department has a total of 7 naval personnel and 26 civilians.

The Department of Naval Equipment is under the Director of Equipment a naval officer of rear-admiral rank. It is responsible for the development, design. and purchase of all weapons, including aircraft, that is used by the fleet. He is assisted by four Captains who are responsible for guns, missiles, torpedoes, and aircraft.
The total staff has besides the above 2 commanders, 3 Lt. Commanders, 4 Lieutenants, 4 Midshipmen and a civilian staff of 1 senior clerk, 4 clerks, 5 secretaries, 8 purchasing agents, giving a total of 18 naval officers and 18 civilians.

The Department of Provisions is under the Director of Provisions who is a civilian appointed by the Overlord and Supervisor of Ships. The Department is responsible for providing the fleet with everything not weapon related such as clothing, food, medical supplies etc. It is the only Department that is entirely civilian except for one Commander who service as liaison officer. The staff consists of 1 Senior Clerk, 3 Clerks, 1 Secretary, 2 Medical inspectors, 12 purchasing agents. giving a total of 1 naval officer and 20 civilians.
The total strength of Naval Central Command is 96 naval officers and 173 civilians giving a total of 269.
The Wellsian Navy has 6 submarines, 8 amphibian support ships, 39 major surface combatants, 29 patrol craft, 12 mine warfare craft and 20 auxiliary ships, giving a total of 114 hulls with an overall displacement of 313,292 metric tons.


Naval Ranks

Rank

Meaning

NATO Code

Insignia

U.S. Rank

Enlisted

Lithmann

Seaman

OR-1

N/A

Seaman Apprentice

Frumlitha

Chief Seaman

OR-3

Seaman

Brimlithead

Leading Seaman

OR-4

Petty Officer 3rd class

Batweard

Boatman

OR-6

Petty Officer 1st class

Heabatweard

Head Boatman

OR-7

Chief Petty Officer

Officers

Midscipmann

Midshipman

OF-1b

Ensign

Heamidscipmannn

Head Midshipman

OF-1a

Lieutenant J.G.

Steorretha

Steermaster

OF-2

Lieutenant

Scipwisa

Ship-director

OF-3

Lieutenant-Commander

Scipweard

Ship-master

OF-4

Commander

Sciphlaford

Ship-chief

OF-5

Captain

Saewisa

Sea-director

OF-7

Rear Admiral

Saeweard

Sea-master

OF-8

Vice Admiral

The ships making up the Royal Navy are:
page=dispatch/id=1581104

Read factbook

Avrazhim wrote:I mean, the identities existed 6 years ago. If you're still in school it's probably that you just haven't heard of them until more recently.

You sure all those mockingly added letters to LGBT in your news post were satire?

yeah, its satire. im not mocking LGBT people, im mocking the ridiculously long acronym they came up with. I mean, if we extend your logic to the other side of the political spectrum, mocking any of any republican's opinions with satire could be seen as some sort of hate. And yes, i dont want to learn a growing amount of gender identities and sexualities and pronouns (or whatever they are now) purely on the basis that it's probably never going to matter to me or the people i surround myself with, ever.

Shidei wrote:The fun part is that there's no easy way to go about this

Gay leaves very little room for anything else and is not indicative of a lot of different things that are meaningfully different like being trans (you can even see this in a lot of the infighting within the community as a whole). I am gay and I use that term all the time, even more than I do lesbian. But if I was bi, I would not consider myself gay. If I was trans, I would not be gay (unless I was both). If I was ace, I would not be gay.

You could use the word Queer, but it has a lot of baggage associated with it since it's a reclaimed slur and a lot of people grew up when it was a bad thing. I personally don't like this word even though I grew up shortly after it fell out of fashion. It's arguably the best umbrella term but ehhhh

There's a more broad term GSM (gender and sexual minority) that could easily contain any number of subtypes and doesn't fall into the problem the ever-expanding LGBT acronym does where it only gets longer as new groups are.. but this has even more baggage associated with it (originally included some nasty and illegal things with it) and it's not common knowledge what it even means. And being referred to as a minority is a big sticking point for a lot of people.

I also have an issue with neopronouns because I view them in the same way I do having the LGBT+ acronym 15 letters long in that it's harmful to the cause right now even though what they stand for is a good thing.

Luckily, you don't have to learn about that many and nobody is being taught that at any noticeable amount. Anyone who says it's happening all the time in schools now is either a liar or being lied to. Some people like boys, some people like girls, some people like nobody. Some people feel like boys, some feel like girls, and some feel like both or neither. Easy as that.

ok sure, fair point, but why lump together the LGB (referring to attraction) and the TQIAA++... (sexual identity)? seems like an unnecessary conjunction to me tbh. Also, reclaimed slurs arent necessarily a bad thing, the Star of David was a reclaimed slur used by Germany during ww2, but now its on the flag of israel (which im not going into on the basis of i like my skull with the current amount of holes it currently has, no more no less)

Reann wrote:As someone who is trans and bi, I kind of use both gay and queer interchangeably but only in English.

In both Finnish and Polish (which I try to use more often), the word "gay" ("homo" in Finnish and "gej" in Polish) solely refers to homosexual men. And in both languages, the term is also a slur (akin to fa**ot).

Takiv wrote:Just for perspective here, I am bi, and I don't really identify with the term "gay." Since it now usually refers to men who only like men, it doesnt really represent who I am, which is why I prefer LGBT or queer as an umbrella term

tbh, im a bit confused abt this. Not abt u guys specifically, you're probably great people and all that, but about the mass expansion of the LGBT community. Like in my country, one in 25 people are LGBT now, which is kinda odd, since around 2019 i think it was closer to one in 100. if this demographic trend goes on, doesnt this become less of a freedom of identity issue and more of a population issue? some basic demographic knowledge tells me that, couple this with birth rates similar/below the replacement rate, and this becomes an issue of the people currently fighting for this LGBT stuff not being able to afford a pension, and by extension retirement, because there just wont be enough money from younger population groups. That said, pls tell me if im wrong/overexaggerating

Holy Karenland wrote:tbh, im a bit confused abt this. Not abt u guys specifically, you're probably great people and all that, but about the mass expansion of the LGBT community. Like in my country, one in 25 people are LGBT now, which is kinda odd, since around 2019 i think it was closer to one in 100. if this demographic trend goes on, doesnt this become less of a freedom of identity issue and more of a population issue? some basic demographic knowledge tells me that, couple this with birth rates similar/below the replacement rate, and this becomes an issue of the people currently fighting for this LGBT stuff not being able to afford a pension, and by extension retirement, because there just wont be enough money from younger population groups. That said, pls tell me if im wrong/overexaggerating

There are many reasons why birth rates are dropping in wealthier countries; people being gay is by far not the main reason. Couples have children at higher ages, they have careers and less time for children, having children is no longer needed to be taken care off when you're old, etc. At the same time, gay people can adopt children in some countries or they can have children through surrogate mothers, so I don't think it is homosexuality that changes much there.

Holy Karenland wrote:tbh, im a bit confused abt this. Not abt u guys specifically, you're probably great people and all that, but about the mass expansion of the LGBT community. Like in my country, one in 25 people are LGBT now, which is kinda odd, since around 2019 i think it was closer to one in 100. if this demographic trend goes on, doesnt this become less of a freedom of identity issue and more of a population issue? some basic demographic knowledge tells me that, couple this with birth rates similar/below the replacement rate, and this becomes an issue of the people currently fighting for this LGBT stuff not being able to afford a pension, and by extension retirement, because there just wont be enough money from younger population groups. That said, pls tell me if im wrong/overexaggerating

This isn't the fault of the LGBT community, that's the fault of straight people. Besides, we're going to hit 10 billion humans on the planet within a decade or two anyway. Seems like a mute issue. Another thing is that bisexual people make up the majority of the community, and bisexual people can have babies regardless.

Yursea wrote:This isn't the fault of the LGBT community, that's the fault of straight people. Besides, we're going to hit 10 billion humans on the planet within a decade or two anyway. Seems like a mute issue. Another thing is that bisexual people make up the majority of the community, and bisexual people can have babies regardless.

actually, there does seem to be a correlation between countries which have been deemed more LGBT accepting and countries with a declining birth rate, if you exclude china and russia, which have a declining birth rate for reasons regarding poor leadership either during ww2 or regarding female children. also, isnt saying the planet will hit 10 billion in a decade or two a bit of an overgeneralisation? most of the high birth rate countries are far outside the west, largely in Africa or south asia. doesn't that kinda mean that, if you want to keep your population able enough to support you when you grow old, you have to accept a bunch of immigrants into your country, which would have a good potential to replace the local culture with their own if the numbers grow large enough, which they may have to? And even if Bi people are the majority of the population, that still means its roughly a coin toss whether or not they get with someone of the opposite gender anyways, so thats still roughly 50% of the LGBT Gene pool gone in that regard. and isnt this problem a good bit worse for most people playing this game? from what i can tell, a large amount of people here are american, and your LGBT population is 11%. Even assuming they were ALL bi, which theyre not, and assuming that all bi people are attracted to both genders equally (which i assume is the point of being bi, but correct me if im wrong) thats still 5.5% of the gene pool, just gone. Keep in mind other parts of the LGBT probably increase that statistic (same-sex oriented people, aka gay & lesbian). couldn't that be an issue in the future if the trend increases, which it has been doing largely since at least 2020?

Holy Karenland wrote:actually, there does seem to be a correlation between countries which have been deemed more LGBT accepting and countries with a declining birth rate, if you exclude china and russia, which have a declining birth rate for reasons regarding poor leadership either during ww2 or regarding female children. also, isnt saying the planet will hit 10 billion in a decade or two a bit of an overgeneralisation? most of the high birth rate countries are far outside the west, largely in Africa or south asia. doesn't that kinda mean that, if you want to keep your population able enough to support you when you grow old, you have to accept a bunch of immigrants into your country, which would have a good potential to replace the local culture with their own if the numbers grow large enough, which they may have to? And even if Bi people are the majority of the population, that still means its roughly a coin toss whether or not they get with someone of the opposite gender anyways, so thats still roughly 50% of the LGBT Gene pool gone in that regard. and isnt this problem a good bit worse for most people playing this game? from what i can tell, a large amount of people here are american, and your LGBT population is 11%. Even assuming they were ALL bi, which theyre not, and assuming that all bi people are attracted to both genders equally (which i assume is the point of being bi, but correct me if im wrong) thats still 5.5% of the gene pool, just gone. Keep in mind other parts of the LGBT probably increase that statistic (same-sex oriented people, aka gay & lesbian). couldn't that be an issue in the future if the trend increases, which it has been doing largely since at least 2020?

No, it's not an issue. America sees plenty of immigrants every year that can replace any population who aren't born in the country. Sexual Freedom is a great thing in the United States.

Holy Karenland wrote:actually, there does seem to be a correlation between countries which have been deemed more LGBT accepting and countries with a declining birth rate, if you exclude china and russia, which have a declining birth rate for reasons regarding poor leadership either during ww2 or regarding female children. also, isnt saying the planet will hit 10 billion in a decade or two a bit of an overgeneralisation? most of the high birth rate countries are far outside the west, largely in Africa or south asia. doesn't that kinda mean that, if you want to keep your population able enough to support you when you grow old, you have to accept a bunch of immigrants into your country, which would have a good potential to replace the local culture with their own if the numbers grow large enough, which they may have to? And even if Bi people are the majority of the population, that still means its roughly a coin toss whether or not they get with someone of the opposite gender anyways, so thats still roughly 50% of the LGBT Gene pool gone in that regard. and isnt this problem a good bit worse for most people playing this game? from what i can tell, a large amount of people here are american, and your LGBT population is 11%. Even assuming they were ALL bi, which theyre not, and assuming that all bi people are attracted to both genders equally (which i assume is the point of being bi, but correct me if im wrong) thats still 5.5% of the gene pool, just gone. Keep in mind other parts of the LGBT probably increase that statistic (same-sex oriented people, aka gay & lesbian). couldn't that be an issue in the future if the trend increases, which it has been doing largely since at least 2020?

Correlation is not causation. Countries that are more developed tend to have lower birth rates, and they also tend to be more supportive of LGBT rights

Out of context, but It would be cool to see a Roleplay Terminology that includes TWI Ideologies, Main Historical Events, Cultures and Great People etc.

Holy Karenland wrote:

tbh, im a bit confused abt this. Not abt u guys specifically, you're probably great people and all that, but about the mass expansion of the LGBT community. Like in my country, one in 25 people are LGBT now, which is kinda odd, since around 2019 i think it was closer to one in 100. if this demographic trend goes on, doesnt this become less of a freedom of identity issue and more of a population issue? some basic demographic knowledge tells me that, couple this with birth rates similar/below the replacement rate, and this becomes an issue of the people currently fighting for this LGBT stuff not being able to afford a pension, and by extension retirement, because there just wont be enough money from younger population groups. That said, pls tell me if im wrong/overexaggerating

Wow, it's not like when LGBT+ people feel more safe to be openly gay, that they choose to be openly gay. What a weird thought...

Additionally regarding your population issue thing; just because you are part of the LGBT+ community does not mean that you will not contribute to the birth rate. Bisexual people exist too.

And just my own thought here too; you are wondering if 1/25 will affect the birthrate negatively, the fu*k are the 24/25 people doing? Aka this is much less of an issue with the LGBT+ community and much more of an societal issue.

Shidei wrote:If you have to tell people you like planes that makes me immediately suspicious you don't. It's basic human instinct everyone should have, so by pointing out that no really you do like them...

Oh no, she unveiled my boat fetish.

Holy Karenland wrote:-

Aye, it's a correlation but not a causation. Populations in develop societies are heading towards a negative trend; but as the LGBT+ community make up less than 1% of the population, it's hardly fair to give them all the credit.

It's mostly because people don't want children as much. A lot of couples prefer fur-babies to actual babies.

Holy Karenland wrote:actually, there does seem to be a correlation between countries which have been deemed more LGBT accepting and countries with a declining birth rate, if you exclude china and russia, which have a declining birth rate for reasons regarding poor leadership either during ww2 or regarding female children.

(Bold italics my emphasis)

Two comments: First, if you cherry-pick any data set enough, you can make it say whatever you want. There's a difference between massaging data and torturing it until it confesses. (Why Russia and China have declining populations is a subject for another discussion.)

Second, yes, there's a correlation, and it's probably causal: "Western" societies tend to be more tolerant, which means not only more people will acknowledge different orientations (etc) but also because those societies have legal access to contraception and abortion. As Great Altera notes, it turns out that given a choice, many people just don't want kids, even beyond questions of cost and so on.

Many more people, given a choice, don't want as many kids. A common American family goal is to have a boy and a girl. That's easy with a combination of contraception and IVF. But exactly two kids is below the replacement rate of about 2.1 kids. So even that "All American" family will cause the US population to fall.

Great Altera wrote:Aye, it's a correlation but not a causation. Populations in develop societies are heading towards a negative trend; but as the LGBT+ community make up less than 1% of the population, it's hardly fair to give them all the credit.

It's mostly because people don't want children as much. A lot of couples prefer fur-babies to actual babies.

youre using the global average, which includes places like afghanistan or iran or palestine, and trust me, if you're a gay person in Iran, lets just say, you wont be for very long. The population in america is 11%, unless ive been lied to by google

Ioudaia wrote:(Bold italics my emphasis)

Two comments: First, if you cherry-pick any data set enough, you can make it say whatever you want. There's a difference between massaging data and torturing it until it confesses. (Why Russia and China have declining populations is a subject for another discussion.)

Second, yes, there's a correlation, and it's probably causal: "Western" societies tend to be more tolerant, which means not only more people will acknowledge different orientations (etc) but also because those societies have legal access to contraception and abortion. As Great Altera notes, it turns out that given a choice, many people just don't want kids, even beyond questions of cost and so on.

Many more people, given a choice, don't want as many kids. A common American family goal is to have a boy and a girl. That's easy with a combination of contraception and IVF. But exactly two kids is below the replacement rate of about 2.1 kids. So even that "All American" family will cause the US population to fall.

all your points i agree with, except the last one. The whole "all american" family, usually has two kids or more, that or more is very important cuz the people having 3-4 or more than that bring the birth rate above the replacement rate. Also, its not really cherrypicking, its kinda because russia lost some fifth of their population in ww2 and china decided it was a good idea to yeetus the fetus

Reann wrote:Wow, it's not like when LGBT+ people feel more safe to be openly gay, that they choose to be openly gay. What a weird thought...

Additionally regarding your population issue thing; just because you are part of the LGBT+ community does not mean that you will not contribute to the birth rate. Bisexual people exist too.

And just my own thought here too; you are wondering if 1/25 will affect the birthrate negatively, the fu*k are the 24/25 people doing? Aka this is much less of an issue with the LGBT+ community and much more of an societal issue.

not saying the 1/25 are the ONLY factor, just saying it could BE a factor. Also in america, thats now over 1/10 now
and the whole bi thing i accounted for, see other post
and Ireland was already pretty LGBT accepting BEFORE 2020, we just weren't making a giant song and dance of it like we are now (not saying its a necessarily bad thing, just saying its kinda hard to avoid, so its gonna influence people)

Yursea wrote:No, it's not an issue. America sees plenty of immigrants every year that can replace any population who aren't born in the country. Sexual Freedom is a great thing in the United States.

doesn't america have a cap on how many visas they can grant each year, something to the tune of 700,000? and theoretically, since america is such a populous country, couldn't the birth rate pretty easily drop below -700,000 a year? doing the math, thats only -0.2% per annum, which it already has in many central and eastern european countries, like germany, romania, and russia? Again, with the mass availability of child prevention services (i wont delve into details cuz controversy) and a lot of americans choosing not to have kids, sexuality or otherwise, couldnt that become a big depopulation issue?

Holy Karenland wrote:not saying the 1/25 are the ONLY factor, just saying it could BE a factor. Also in america, thats now over 1/10 now
and the whole bi thing i accounted for, see other post
and Ireland was already pretty LGBT accepting BEFORE 2020, we just weren't making a giant song and dance of it like we are now (not saying its a necessarily bad thing, just saying its kinda hard to avoid, so its gonna influence people)

Again, making the low birthrates the fault of the LGBT+ community is really going nowehere, when most of the population that chooses not to procreate is not gay.

And no, having more LGBT+ exposure is not going to influence people. This is like basic logic. If you can influence someone's sexuality, why do you think queer people exist? By far most of my family, friends, media, everything that have been around is cis and straight. Then why am I not cis or straight? Then why is basically anyone gay or queer or whatever as by far most of our surroundings are not queer?

Holy Karenland wrote:Also, its not really cherrypicking, its kinda because russia lost some fifth of their population in ww2 and china decided it was a good idea to yeetus the fetus

Both nations are currently losing people, as in right now. It turns out that any Russian who can flee being used as part of a human wave against machine-gun and artillery fire either has done so or is trying to. Europe has taken in a lot of Russia's best and brightest, so in addition to raw population loss, Russia has a huge brain drain.

And the remaining people aren't so happy being some of Vlad the Impaler's "little playings", per the NS definition of a psychotic dictatorship. So, they're variously drinking themselves to death and/or not having kids.

China, on the other hand, is carrying out genocide against the Uighurs, which doesn't exactly help population growth. And many of the young people in the more populous ethnic groups (Han, Manju, etc) are tired of the rat race and giving up, part of which is not having kids. See the "lying flat" (tang ping) and "let it rot" (bai lian) movements: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tang_ping

Holy Karenland wrote:doesn't america have a cap on how many visas they can grant each year, something to the tune of 700,000? and theoretically, since america is such a populous country, couldn't the birth rate pretty easily drop below -700,000 a year?

That's not so much "can grant" as "chooses to grant". The US can, and has, taken in many more immigrants every year that it does currently. 700k is pretty close to the number of legal new admissions to the US (work visa, student visa, resident alien, etc), but some people already here in those categories apply for and earn American citizenship. So, looking at the stats for the last few years, the actual legal immigration rate, which includes both new people entering the US, and existing people becoming citizens, is between 1.5M and 2.0M people per year.

See: https://ohss.dhs.gov/topics/immigration/yearbook for official information. I remain amazed at how much better informed one can be about a topic with something like five minutes' online searching.

Illegal immigration is another matter entirely, and generally thought to be much larger.

Konstansin empire

Is there someone that I can be enemy with in the Southern Sea ?

drama in the RMB?

popcorn munching

Holy Karenland wrote:yeah, its satire. im not mocking LGBT people, im mocking the ridiculously long acronym they came up with. I mean, if we extend your logic to the other side of the political spectrum, mocking any of any republican's opinions with satire could be seen as some sort of hate. And yes, i dont want to learn a growing amount of gender identities and sexualities and pronouns (or whatever they are now) purely on the basis that it's probably never going to matter to me or the people i surround myself with, ever.
ok sure, fair point, but why lump together the LGB (referring to attraction) and the TQIAA++... (sexual identity)? seems like an unnecessary conjunction to me tbh. Also, reclaimed slurs arent necessarily a bad thing, the Star of David was a reclaimed slur used by Germany during ww2, but now its on the flag of israel (which im not going into on the basis of i like my skull with the current amount of holes it currently has, no more no less)
tbh, im a bit confused abt this. Not abt u guys specifically, you're probably great people and all that, but about the mass expansion of the LGBT community. Like in my country, one in 25 people are LGBT now, which is kinda odd, since around 2019 i think it was closer to one in 100

This is the same reason why "hate the sin, love the sinner" is almost if not more toxic and hateful than outright rejection. You are directly attacking someone's fundamental identity of themselves as a person, not their opinions or beliefs about a subject. Hopefully you can see a bit difference there. This is a subject I could go much more in depth into, but that would be better served through telegram rather than here on the RMB

You really don't have to learn much of anything you don't already know. If someone comes up to you and says "My name is Mark, nice to meet you" you can make a fair assumption as to how to address them. If their voice is surprisingly high pitched and they happen they have longer hair, you might have assumed they were female at first, but if they say "sorry, I get that a lot, but I am a guy" you now know how to interact with Mark and how to refer to him. Almost everyone is willing to politely correct people who may not have known something. If you are told the correct way to do something and decide you know better and you think his name is actually Samantha? That's your fault

Neopronouns and 40 genders is not something you will really ever run into outside of certain corners of the internet. The vast, vast, vast, vast majority of people will identify as male, female, or neither in particular, and prefer to use He/She/They depending on preference. These are words you already use. You likely don't need to worry about whatever aergender means for the 12 people who identify as it, much like I don't need to worry about the difference between southern baptist and pentecostal when I'm casually talking to someone who identifies as Christian

As for why the LGBT umbrella contains several different types of identification? Simple, they're all part of self identity and have, traditionally, been marginalized, threatened, and subjugated by society for the crime of... being harmlessly different than others

Reclaimed slurs aren't necessarily a bad thing, but it's perfectly acceptable to not want to associate yourself with a term that was used to marginalize and "other" people like you

If you want something interesting to look at, I suggest reading about the rise in left-handedness over time. I'll let you draw your own conclusions from it, but it does seem to mirror the decline in children being abused for being left-handed

Shidei wrote:If you want something interesting to look at, I suggest reading about the rise in left-handedness over time. I'll let you draw your own conclusions from it, but it does seem to mirror the decline in children being abused for being left-handed

Whooowheeee stop spreading left-handed propaganda! There are children around!

Reann wrote:Whooowheeee stop spreading left-handed propaganda! There are children around!

Sounds like some of my Country's politicians

Supreme Court of the Takivaj Republic
Kolga Ultinaj ot Davnog Takivaj

The Kolgajok, the meeting place of the Supreme Court. [made by tengr.ai]

Established:

9 December 1872

Jurisdiction:

Takiv

Location:

Konev, Dāzvin, Takiv

Composition method:

8 justices elected by each chamber of Parliament

Authorized by:

Constitution of Takiv

Judge term length:

16 years

Number of positions:

16

Appeals from:

High Civil Court
High Criminal Court


Chief Justice of the Supreme Court

Current officeholder:

Nuzkar Bovlev

Since:

5 January 2010

Term expires:

5 January 2026

The Supreme Court of the Takivaj Republic [SCOTR] (Takivaj: Kolga Ultinaj ot Davnog Takivaj [KUDT]) is the highest court within the Takivaj national judiciary. It is the nation's highest appellate court, only hearing cases that offer constitutional questions or cases about disputes between regions. The Court holds the power of judicial review, the power to strike down legislation for violating the Constitution. This power extends to both national and regional legislation.

The Court is composed of 16 justices, who serve single 16-year terms. 8 Justice seats are appointed by each chamber of Parliament when a justice's term expires, or if they resign, die, or are impeached.

Justice nominations, while nominally nonpartisan, have become more and more divided over time between the two major parties.

Read factbook

working on a Supreme Court factbook rn

The Philippines with a 2.75 birth rate, 1.5 population growth rate, and also the gayest country in Asia. Keep up straight people get 8 children

Shidei wrote:-

I draw the line at acknowledging left-handers as anything but subhuman.

Still ranked higher than gingers though.

And the French.

Don't know what would happen if I ever met a left-handed, ginger Frenchman.

«12. . .24,49724,49824,49924,50024,50124,50224,503. . .24,53924,540»

Advertisement