by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .21,77221,77321,77421,77521,77621,77721,778. . .24,39924,400»

Thuzbekistan

Ainslie wrote:
So Dormill and Stiura and I have been working on an idea to create an onsite “TWIkipedia”, essentially an encyclopaedia which, through a system of categories and nation-specific navigation pages, allows users to jump between factbooks quicker and jump between the canons of different nations in TWI quicker. I’m just starting up getting my Ainslie, Keverai and Gresswell stuff on there so there’s some existing infrastructure and dispatches in the different categories. Just also wanted to talk about some of the concerns and questions around the idea I’ve heard in a central and easy accessible place like this. So here’s some of the stuff I’ve heard:

1. I don’t use wikistyle factbooks, does that mean I can’t contribute or I’ll be forced to change to the wikistyle format? Nope. You’ll be able to contribute and in no way have to give up existing or future formats. As I mentioned before, there will be a category for each nation who participates (which I call a portal page), regardless of whether it’s wikistyle or not - as long as you consent or are willing to have these pages. There, there will be a list of all factbooks and dispatches from any onsite source (IC government websites, IC tourist guides etc) and it will be marked as whatever source if comes from (including twikipedia if there is a mix on that category page). All I’ll ask is that you provide a link to your portal on that non wikistyle factbook and that you host the specific category page for your nation. Latter I’d like to happen regardless of whether you use wikistyle or not.
2. What happens if I use an existing wikistyle template? I’d encourage you to take up the new format and I willprovide templates, but the only things I’ll really push is a box at the top with the logo and title and a link to relevant categories at the bottom of the page. Beyond that, how you format it is up to you but I’ll provide a template if you do want to use it.

And now just a couple FAQ thingos
1. When will this be up? At the moment I’m sorting and working through my Ainslie, Keverai and Gresswell Island stuff so I can get that all sorted before I get other nations onto TWIkipedia. I’d say the basic cogs of it should be working by the end of the week. You’ll be able to see progressive changes on my Ainslie and Keverai accounts, whilst I’ve got a TWIkipedia Account I’ll be bringing in when I start accepting others into the system.
2. When can I get my stuff on there? Can’t tell you exactly when since it’ll likely vary between individual nations, but I can tell you how. I’ll be taking TGs from people who have wikistyle factbooks or want portals set up and they’ll be prioritised first. You can send them any time from now, I’ll just store them in a TG folder for when the time comes. All you got to do is tell me what you want and send me the relevant links. After that, I’ll likely put out a RMB announcement and a past two weeks classifieds thingo saying I’m taking links. After that, I’ll be going through individual nations and sending them TGs about possible integration into the TWIkipedia system.

I know this is complicated, but it’s probably because I am going into excessive detail about this all. Happy to answer any questions or concerns around this and feedback is welcomed.

NO

1. How are new members going to be treated in this? You gonna be pushing this in their face and possibly rob them of creative freedom by pressuring them to do this? Is wiki-style now gonna be the defacto style? How do we encourage new people to do more like cosie with a cookie cutter system like this encouraging them to do the copy-paste wiki?

2. Why should anyone be encouraged to do this? Why should anyone care or use it?

3. You're creating MORE work for the next SORP. Why?

Vancouvia, Ter natiour, Almorea, and Nezaeva

Belle ilse en terre

Thuzbekistan wrote:NO

1. How are new members going to be treated in this? You gonna be pushing this in their face and possibly rob them of creative freedom by pressuring them to do this? Is wiki-style now gonna be the defacto style? How do we encourage new people to do more like cosie with a cookie cutter system like this encouraging them to do the copy-paste wiki?

2. Why should anyone be encouraged to do this? Why should anyone care or use it?

3. You're creating MORE work for the next SORP. Why?

Do you like the concept though, of TWIkipedia?

Thuzbekistan

Belle ilse en terre wrote:Do you like the concept though, of TWIkipedia?

No. I dont like anything that tries to force new people into molds.

Belle ilse en terre

Belle ilse en terre

Thuzbekistan wrote:No. I dont like anything that tries to force new people into molds.

I was more referring to the idea of a region-wide repository for nation information, and in-depth ADTWI

Almorea

Belle ilse en terre wrote:I was more referring to the idea of a region-wide repository for nation information, and in-depth ADTWI

No. Too much work for too little value

Thuzbekistan wrote:No. Too much work for too little value

I agree with you... we've tried projects of this scale before and it's just the already active members who participate. Only takes three clicks to get to someone's wiki/main factbook page. If Ainslie wants to collate information, fine, but no one should feel pressured into complying with a single format

Thuzbekistan

Vancouvia wrote:I agree with you... we've tried projects of this scale before and it's just the already active members who participate. Only takes three clicks to get to someone's wiki/main factbook page. If Ainslie wants to collate information, fine, but no one should feel pressured into complying with a single format

I almost revived your 5 questions from the senate. But only 2 need mentioning:

1. Does it fix a problem? No
2. Does it increase the enjoyment of twi? No.

We already have ADTWI for quick reference to a wide range of nations. I don't see the point of a second, far more complicated system.

Nezaeva

REMEMBER THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T HIDE

Wut

Athara magarat

Thuzbekistan wrote:REMEMBER THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T HIDE

Wut

Usually I am the one others ask this about but this time I will say..."context, please"

Ter natiour

Post self-deleted by Athara magarat.

Athara magarat wrote:Usually I am the one others ask this about but this time I will say..."context, please"

Enchanta

Athara magarat

Thuzbekistan wrote:Enchanta

Oh. Okay.

And...

viewtopic.php?f=4&t=416578

I once wrote a Stellaris AAR that was never completed...

Heck, the name People's Civic Congress (AM's current political party) is actually from Stellaris :P

So, if you are finished with your campaign, will you considering writing its AAR...aka how the glorious Thusbek League brought communism to the galaxy :P

Thuzbekistan wrote:REMEMBER THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T HIDE

Wut

I actually find that pretty clever. A fun little bit of propaganda.

Athara magarat

Menna shuli wrote:I actually find that pretty clever. A fun little bit of propaganda.

Except it's a reasonable guess to say that was not intended to function that way.

Dormill and Stiura wrote:Except it's a reasonable guess to say that was not intended to function that way.

I think we all have to remember that Enchanta is like 13 and we've been ragging on her pretty hard. It's easy to forget, but I for one feel a bit bad about the way we have presented criticism to a child.

Razzgriz, Wellsia, Belle ilse en terre, Samudera, and 3 othersNegarakita, Thuzbekistan, and Almorea

Menna shuli wrote:I think we all have to remember that Enchanta is like 13 and we've been ragging on her pretty hard. It's easy to forget, but I for one feel a bit bad about the way we have presented criticism to a child.

Nuh uh. Immigrant parents are hard on their kids all the time and become doctors and stuff all the time.

Thuzbekistan

Athara magarat wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitra

He is found in other ancient Indo-European religions or cultures as well :P

Yes, that's why I specified Vedic Mitra.

Athara magarat wrote:With all due respect sir, the English-only rule applies to everyone equally.

We have been in Kali Yug since a long time.

Yep, if you believe Puranic lore and timekeeping, then we have been in Kaliyug since 3102 BC. Interestingly enough, we still have several hundreds of thousands of years until the end of Kaliyug and arrival of Lord Kalki according to the Puranas.

Athara magarat

Balnik wrote:Nuh uh. Immigrant parents are hard on their kids all the time and become doctors and stuff all the time.

We're not her parents. I, for one, feel guilty about the way I've occasionally handled the situation. Thinking back on the region a few years ago, I honestly think Enchanta has a firmer base than many people and that we have to have a bit more patience.

Balnik, Athara magarat, and Wellsia

Menna shuli wrote:We're not her parents. I, for one, feel guilty about the way I've occasionally handled the situation. Thinking back on the region a few years ago, I honestly think Enchanta has a firmer base than many people and that we have to have a bit more patience.

Idk. In sunalaya we always brought in recruits with trial by fire. Enchanta has already proved her resolve. It's not like we can do any worse with our criticism without being out of line.

Alteran Republics what was this P.89 stealth bomber you mentioned in the Twitter thread?

Menna shuli wrote:We're not her parents. I, for one, feel guilty about the way I've occasionally handled the situation. Thinking back on the region a few years ago, I honestly think Enchanta has a firmer base than many people and that we have to have a bit more patience.

I completely agree. I think I was worse when I joined.

Balnik wrote:Idk. In sunalaya we always brought in recruits with trial by fire. Enchanta has already proved her resolve. It's not like we can do any worse with our criticism without being out of line.

I don't recall an explicit trial by fire except for Aznazia's carrier thing.

Dormill and Stiura wrote:I don't recall an explicit trial by fire except for Aznazia's carrier thing.

you don't remember flaming any of the newbies when they joined? Good times.

Balnik wrote:Idk. In sunalaya we always brought in recruits with trial by fire. Enchanta has already proved her resolve. It's not like we can do any worse with our criticism without being out of line.

I can count on one hand the number of people who care about Sunalaya in this region.

Balnik and Ter natiour

«12. . .21,77221,77321,77421,77521,77621,77721,778. . .24,39924,400»

Advertisement