«12. . .2,6842,6852,6862,6872,6882,6892,690. . .27,61127,612»
*Jabs 
Miss Hungary with the point*
No trying to freeze me. I'm trying to consume stuff here.
Typical human arrogance.
There is no transcending going on. Nothing that exists is ever unnatural. But one thing that can always be relied upon is that humans will always find excuses for proclaiming themselves special or somehow separate from it all....
All this "gender identity" stuff is nonsense... Some people are content with what they've got, while others want to be trans-whatevers or attack-helicopters or whatever best fuels their personal self-perception... But frankly the whole topic is silly. Discussing it won't change anything because the whole thing is just an ego-trip... another trivial dalliance serving to distract these meat-based lifeforms from the utter pointlessness of their own recursive lives.
Now can we all just get back to eating stuff... and not arguing nor trying to freeze me?
I'm sure we're all agreed that food is pretty neat, yes?
Miss Hungary, The cybermen, Neopatria, and Core mining
No, it's like light.
It exists, but it doesn't "take up" space: the same point in space could be occupied by matter too, or by 'more light'.
No.
So, fermions do occupy space, since you can only have a finite number of them in the same position.
Gravitons, which are still hypothetical, are speculated to be bosons (like photons, the carriers of light). Bosons are a class of particles that isn't subject to the Pauli exclusion principle. They don't really 'occupy' space (or, rather, that same space could be occupied by an infinite number - if you had it - of other bosons, and then by a fermion too).
All atoms with an even number of constituents are bosons too, by definition. However in this case they do occupy space: even discounting electromagnetic repulsion, the exclusion principle would still prevent the quarks and electrons that make them up from being in the same position.
Typical pseudo-intellectual garbage.
:P
oh!
Wait.. so it does not take up physical space? so it technically does not exist?
Agreed! As we see bombing them into the stone age isn't working. Perhaps if major nations stepped back from their own agendas in the region and a multi national Strike force was deployed that hunted violent combatants down. Buffer zones, sanctions and carpet bombing have just failed. Peace and freedom will never be gained from those who those who will not follow them and their frightful beliefs.
That's not true actually. Man has indeed gone beyond the scope of what is natural. Humanity creates unnatural things all the time and they've created an era of convenience. A lifestyle that nature wasn't going to offer. But if there are wild smartphones frolicking in some field somewhere then I'd really like to know. ^_^
Concerning ze poll. Why am I missing. After all I vas Zaphod Beeblebrox's personal brain care specialist.
probably because you're a relatively minor character *pats head* I can't include everyone you know :)
I'd just give up on the whole thing and just pull all troops out of the entire region and let them sort it out themselves.
*Opens garage door to show time-traveling DeLorean*
Care to rephrase? :D
*eats DeLorean* it's a failed company dude! Their last order was to have me eat all the cars they sold. *burps*
I dunno, probably :p
Humans are a process of nature as much as the tides or avalanches are. Ergo human creations are a product of nature too, as much as ant-hills, fossils or metamorphic rocks are. You won't find penguins frolicking in a field somewhere either, because the conditions are not conducive to their creation. Look in the right places and you'll find what you're looking for.
Calling things you disagree with "pseudo-intellectual" is about as self-referential as it gets.
My statement was correct. Disagreement with it is incorrect. Calling it garbage is itself garbage. Deal with it.
I decided to exclude Trillian because she wasn't a super major character.
«12. . .2,6842,6852,6862,6872,6882,6892,690. . .27,61127,612»
Advertisement
