by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .911912913914915916917. . .2,3082,309»

Post by Vlawarkay suppressed by Dawtania.

capitalism works

Soviet tankistan

Vlawarkay wrote:capitalism works

So does socialism. Capitalism has many undesirable effects and will always be flawed.

Greylyn and Kalordolor

Soviet tankistan wrote:So does socialism. Capitalism has many undesirable effects and will always be flawed.

yeah, tenically every ideology works if done right

Soviet tankistan

Vlawarkay wrote:yeah, tenically every ideology works if done right

No, anarchism (large scale) and fascism never work.

Kalordolor

To be absolutely fair to anarchists, I don't think it is supposed to work on a large scale. I think federations of small anarchist groups is the idea.

Nottinhaps, Llorens, and Kalordolor

We need a united front of the Left.

Vlawarkay wrote:capitalism works

That's where your wrong. Capitalism hasn't succeeded ever! Left ideology may not be perfect but it has made farther progress in creating a perfect nation than capitalism ever has.

Fevhader wrote:That's where your wrong. Capitalism hasn't succeeded ever! Left ideology may not be perfect but it has made farther progress in creating a perfect nation than capitalism ever has.

Actually, capitalism is a needed transition away from feudalism, but still, must be replaced.

Kalordolor wrote:Actually, capitalism is a needed transition away from feudalism, but still, must be replaced.

Capitalism was better than feudalism that didn't mean it succeeded. There both horrible.

Greylyn and Kalordolor

Fevhader wrote:Capitalism was better than feudalism that didn't mean it succeeded. There both horrible.

Both did their job, and are no longer needed.

Could I receive Embassy Authority?

Kalordolor wrote:Could I receive Embassy Authority?

Did you become ambassador?

Kalordolor

Soviet tankistan

Caracasus wrote:To be absolutely fair to anarchists, I don't think it is supposed to work on a large scale. I think federations of small anarchist groups is the idea.

Statist groups can easily attack and defeat the anarchists.

Kalordolor

Soviet tankistan

Help, my illegal market is bigger than my private market.

Kalordolor

Fevhader wrote:Did you become ambassador?

No... I just feel we need more Embassies!

Soviet tankistan wrote:The ‘Soviet’ March is patriotic? To whom? The game developers? It is an American corporate song that is not written for America or the Soviet Union. It’s no bad compared to most music, but is sloppy and it doesn’t resemble real Soviet patriotic music. When I think of something that inspired patriotism, I think about learning of WW2 or the Battle Hymn of the Republic. Even just the flag or military (like the Army’s theme). There is a lot of reasons to be patriotic, a video game is not one of them. I play a game with Soviet tanks because they are cool, not because using them makes me a better Soviet (especially when I am American of all things). The Command and Conquer games are ridiculously inaccurate and should only be played for fun. I would recommend learning more about the military of the actual Soviet Union, it is very interesting.
Americans and Europeans are far more likely to be libertarians and even third world countries have a lot of libertarian socialists compared to the overall libertarian-authoritarian trend. Here in America, it is more like 1 statist socialist to every 1,000 libertarian socialists, who are all very outnumbered. Libertarian socialism appeals short term, but authoritarian socialism promises more gain. Asian countries are different because their culture is often based on very nationalist and traditionalist ideas that are ingrained to the state, as opposed to the third world where dictators do whatever they want because nobody can stop them or protest.

You're extremely rude to people you don't agree with. This isn't conduct we want on the RMB, and if you keep it up we will have to take actions against you. If you don't agree with someone, respectfully disagree - don't attack or be rude. That's not how you be a comrade, that's how you get kicked out.

Patriotism is a personal opinion in this instance. Soviet March made ME feel patriotic towards ideology in the parts of the game where you, the player, crushes through the Berlin Wall. Where you, the player, invade America. The song was written to emulate Soviet marches while remaining its own independent thing. As well, you're arguing that in your personal opinion that you, an individual with their own interests, don't like the song. There's no reason to be rude about it.

next part;

You should probably examine history on that statement, because the reasoning is found within that. Western nations favour libertarian ideals, because the west during the cold war were upheld by Capitalism. The Middle East, Asia, and Africa were being invaded by western powers - they understood that within their situation they couldn't possibly have a libertarian society while the imperialist war machine bombed their cities and killed their children. Westerners support libertarianism, because westerners understand their nation won't be invaded by the Americans. We can also look on the macro scale - such as with the women's liberation and the black liberation movements of the United States. Communities that were being raided by the cops, where people were being arrested or beat without provocation, tended to favour authoritarian socialist ideals. For instance, the Black Panther Party favoured Maoism, Leninism, and Marxism over Anarchist and Libertarian ideals, and the radical feminists favoured classical Marxism, and Leninism over those same Anarchist and Libertarian ideals. Further, the West's leftist activism started with Syndicalists and Wobblies, who didn't need authoritarian Marxist ideals to invent equality in the workplace - which is something that carries on with western leftist activism to the current time. There are other history notes, but they're not super important for this lil tidbit. The thing I'm trying to get across is though, nobody knows exactly how many of either pole exist, and there's no way to truly measure. So stop acting like you do, and like your word is that of absolute authority.

Fevhader wrote:That's where your wrong. Capitalism hasn't succeeded ever! Left ideology may not be perfect but it has made farther progress in creating a perfect nation than capitalism ever has.

That's where you're wrong. Capitalism works perfectly well, and exactly as intended. It's a system that makes the rich richer by design, and the poor poorer as a result. And it's only an evolution of the same old system that's been around for centuries - just something that extends the power of the immortal rich class far past its natural lifetime.

Kalordolor wrote:Could I receive Embassy Authority?

You may not, but if you feel we need more embassies, I am MoFA, and I'm the person you should come to if you want to make suggestions. You can inbox me regions you want me to investigate, if that's what you're interested in.

Cedoria, Nottinhaps, Argentigrad, and Kalordolor

Kalordolor

Hecknamistan wrote:I am MoFA, and I'm the person you should come to if you want to make suggestions. You can inbox me regions you want me to investigate, if that's what you're interested in.

Okay, could you please create a Embassy with Alliance for Science II?

Kalordolor wrote:Okay, could you please create a Embassy with Alliance for Science II?

telegram me a link please, this business doesn't really belong on the RMB. Thank you though.

Cedoria, Nottinhaps, and Kalordolor

Just a friendly reminder to please keep the arguments on the RMB civilised and free from personal allegations, thanks:) Vigorous debate is great to see, but we want to keep this welcoming and friendly for all. Thanks to those who've remembered that as the debate has gone on:)

The final horseman, Nottinhaps, Llorens, Hecknamistan, and 4 othersArgentigrad, Saint perpetua, Greylyn, and Kalordolor

Soviet tankistan

Hecknamistan wrote:You're extremely rude to people you don't agree with. This isn't conduct we want on the RMB, and if you keep it up we will have to take actions against you. If you don't agree with someone, respectfully disagree - don't attack or be rude. That's not how you be a comrade, that's how you get kicked out.

Patriotism is a personal opinion in this instance. Soviet March made ME feel patriotic towards ideology in the parts of the game where you, the player, crushes through the Berlin Wall. Where you, the player, invade America. The song was written to emulate Soviet marches while remaining its own independent thing. As well, you're arguing that in your personal opinion that you, an individual with their own interests, don't like the song. There's no reason to be rude about it.

next part;

You should probably examine history on that statement, because the reasoning is found within that. Western nations favour libertarian ideals, because the west during the cold war were upheld by Capitalism. The Middle East, Asia, and Africa were being invaded by western powers - they understood that within their situation they couldn't possibly have a libertarian society while the imperialist war machine bombed their cities and killed their children. Westerners support libertarianism, because westerners understand their nation won't be invaded by the Americans. We can also look on the macro scale - such as with the women's liberation and the black liberation movements of the United States. Communities that were being raided by the cops, where people were being arrested or beat without provocation, tended to favour authoritarian socialist ideals. For instance, the Black Panther Party favoured Maoism, Leninism, and Marxism over Anarchist and Libertarian ideals, and the radical feminists favoured classical Marxism, and Leninism over those same Anarchist and Libertarian ideals. Further, the West's leftist activism started with Syndicalists and Wobblies, who didn't need authoritarian Marxist ideals to invent equality in the workplace - which is something that carries on with western leftist activism to the current time. There are other history notes, but they're not super important for this lil tidbit. The thing I'm trying to get across is though, nobody knows exactly how many of either pole exist, and there's no way to truly measure. So stop acting like you do, and like your word is that of absolute authority.

That's where you're wrong. Capitalism works perfectly well, and exactly as intended. It's a system that makes the rich richer by design, and the poor poorer as a result. And it's only an evolution of the same old system that's been around for centuries - just something that extends the power of the immortal rich class far past its natural lifetime.

You may not, but if you feel we need more embassies, I am MoFA, and I'm the person you should come to if you want to make suggestions. You can inbox me regions you want me to investigate, if that's what you're interested in.

If political parties had voting are any indication, libertarians have many more votes than authoritarians. I don’t think authoritarian socialists have a party. And it is folly to say America is libertarian. They are authoritarian, just not totalitarian. People just believe they have full rights when they are being manipulated. Freedom of speech is an illusion.

Soviet tankistan wrote:If political parties had voting are any indication, libertarians have many more votes than authoritarians. I don’t think authoritarian socialists have a party. And it is folly to say America is libertarian. They are authoritarian, just not totalitarian. People just believe they have full rights when they are being manipulated. Freedom of speech is an illusion.

I didn't say America was libertarian. I said Americans generally support libertarianism more often. I'm done arguing with you tbh, this is like talking to trees.

There are multiple Auth parties and organizations in the United States, just as there are multiple Libertarian parties and organizations. Also parties arent an indication, it's more likely a person won't join a party or an organization that they would agree with, as well it's common for people to join parties and organizations that don't accurately represent their ideals. So you can't gleam anything from looking at parties, it's only an indication that parties exist.

Nottinhaps and Kalordolor

Caracasus

I've always found political defenitions of libertarian and authoritarian stances interesting, especially in the context of mainstream politics.

Libertarians seem to like easing financial regulation, allowing employers to hire and fire at will and stripping back existing legal recourses to the most vulnerable.

It seems that libertarians want to create a thousand more tyrants in workplaces and homes all across the country.

Nottinhaps and Kalordolor

Caracasus wrote:I've always found political defenitions of libertarian and authoritarian stances interesting, especially in the context of mainstream politics.

Libertarians seem to like easing financial regulation, allowing employers to hire and fire at will and stripping back existing legal recourses to the most vulnerable.

It seems that libertarians want to create a thousand more tyrants in workplaces and homes all across the country.

Definitely true of right-wing libertarians. I object to referring to them as 'libertarians' at all to be honest. There is nothing libertarian about complete corporate tyranny.

Caracasus, Nottinhaps, Llorens, Hecknamistan, and 4 othersArgentigrad, Saint perpetua, Kalordolor, and Welshpool

Cedoria wrote:Definitely true of right-wing libertarians. I object to referring to them as 'libertarians' at all to be honest. There is nothing libertarian about complete corporate tyranny.

So true, handing over control to unregulated, unelected national corporations is almost as authoritarian as authoritarianism is. The policy of left wing Libertarians is slightly different as they do believe in the protection of workers and cultural protection to those weakest in society but this depends on everyone being tolerant and accepting of one another which is not the case especially under the current capitalist system.

Greylyn and Kalordolor

Cedoria wrote:Definitely true of right-wing libertarians. I object to referring to them as 'libertarians' at all to be honest. There is nothing libertarian about complete corporate tyranny.

Oh no doubt, I qualified it with mainstream politics.

For libertarian leftism to be represented or understood, you'd have to undo about a century's worth of propaganda.

«12. . .911912913914915916917. . .2,3082,309»

Advertisement