Are you seriously believing Russia and Syria here more? o_O
Here's one theory why he might have made the attack: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/07/syria-nerve-agent-attack-why-it-made-sense-to-assad
In a way, sure. I wouldn't phrase it so much as "believing them" as "suspecting tomfoolery" and/or "shenanigans in general", but if you wish to put it as such, then so be it.
Perhaps a bit more credibility is added to the fact that they aren't bothering to deny that they did launch airstrikes on the area. If they did and were trying to cover it up, why wouldn't they shove that bit under the blanket as well?
So... he did it because he thought he could? Still doesn't make much sense, considering that they would have chosen now to resort to them when you had the Brussels conference scheduled for the very same day and the peace talks to resume within a few days, does it? The army itself may be war-weary, but they've still got a number of allies behind them, and they've still been slowly but steadily making gains.
Everyone quick! Hop on over to https://discord.gg/ncjU5 for delegate debates!
I actually think Sanskrit is a cool writing style, I cant read a single letter but it looks cool
Kanji is truly evil
Ubaid and Jute
For those of us hoping to use logic to discover who used Chemical Weapons in Syria, we should abandon that. In what circumstance is it logical for rational humans to use Chemical Weapons in a civil war? Why would you ever attack the civilians of the nation you are trying to win over? Do you want to rule over a wasteland?
It's better go be the uncontested leader of a wasteland than be Gadffied.
For some, maybe.
I think most people would prefer ruling a wasteland and being alive then be anally raped to death with a machete
True, but it's not like this would ever be the only two options. (Though fleeing isn't an option for people clinging to power). This is actually an argument why an allegedly "winning" dictator president might use gas weapons.
Are you implying that's what happens :P
There is no point in ruling if there is nothing to rule, one man doesn't make a king
If that's the question then there is no logical answer besides he wanted to or he was framed
That would never happen in the real world
What wouldn't happen, please specify?
So when should we start endorsing the new elected delegate cause didn't Jute win
The vote hasnt happened yet I dont think, theres one tomorrow
The first round, but there'll be a second round.
Permanent link to the delegate debate server. Make sure you give the whole thing a read through, the most important thing is that you make an informed decision on who to vote for. I'm certain that I speak for both myself and Jute that we care more about everyone voting for whoever they think is best rather than ourselves winning.
For some reason my laptop doesn't work with whatever the delegate debate for some reason. it won't let me access it
Is it saying the invite isn't permanent?
Cyrillic is pretty.
*read In Advertisement Voice*
Do you have a weak military force? Do want a stable economy?
Do want more Friends?
If you said yes to any of these questions, "Join us" at the A.R.M.S.!
No i need adobe to access it for some reason and I'm already set with Safari so i don't really want to change anything