WA Delegate (non-executive): The Constitutional Monarchy of Holy Oceanian Empire (elected )
Last WA Update:
Embassies: Africa, Asia, Argentina, Australia, belgium, Brasil, China, France, India, Indonesia, Japan, Paraguay, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, United States of America, and 28 others.42 Douglas Adams, Bikini Islands, Canterbury, Florida, Future Earth, International Debating Area, Mediterranean, Middle East, North America, Nusantara Archipelago, Ocean, Playboy, Right to Life, South Pacific, The Bar on the corner of every region, The Dank Meme Alliance, The Doctor Who Universe, The Embassy, The Sense of Right Alliance, The Turtle Isles, The Western Isles, The World of Remnant, Warzone Airspace, Warzone America, Warzone Europe, World Conference, Worldly Debate Region, and The Democratic Commonwealth.
Construction of embassies with Novo Brasil has commenced. Completion expected .
Tags: Security Council, Totalitarian, Future Tech, Free Trade, Puppet Storage, Role Player, Past Tech, Eco-Friendly, Post Apocalyptic, Neutral, Medium, Conservative, and 19 others.General Assembly, Independent, Industrial, Post-Modern Tech, Human-Only, Parody, Imperialist, Generalite, Social, Game Player, World Assembly, FT: STL, International Federalist, Offsite Forums, Casual, Socialist, Regional Government, Map, and Modern Tech.
Today's World Census Report
The Most Extensive Civil Rights in Oceania
The citizens of nations ranked highly enjoy a great amount of civil rights, or freedoms to go about their personal business without interference or regulation from government.
As a region, Oceania is ranked 16,530th in the world for Most Extensive Civil Rights.
|1.||The Constitutional Monarchy of Oceanian Raj||Civil Rights Lovefest||“Peace and Prosperity”|
|2.||The Constitutional Monarchy of Holy Oceanian Empire||Civil Rights Lovefest||“👑 From Frontier to Frontier 🌏”|
|3.||The Rogue Nation of The Malexicapeskeland||Father Knows Best State||“Twirling Toward Freedom”|
|4.||The Protectorate of Spanish Micronesia||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“🌞 A Solis Ortu Usque ad Occasum 🌚”|
|5.||The Natrium of Na||New York Times Democracy||“Na”|
|6.||The E-farm of Nukufetau||New York Times Democracy||“Sowing bytes & bits, Harvesting cash & credits”|
|7.||The Empire of Skipperton||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“In Mike we trust.”|
|8.||The Kingdom of Unidad y Prosperidad||New York Times Democracy||“Further Beyond”|
|9.||The Confederacy of Archipelago of Greece||Liberal Democratic Socialists||“For the love of Poseidon”|
|10.||The Commonwealth of Van Hool Islands||Inoffensive Centrist Democracy||“Paradijs Op Aarde/Paradise On Earth”|
- : The Socialist States of Oceania Founder rejected Central Area's request for regional embassies.
- : The Socialist States of Oceania Founder agreed to construct embassies with Novo Brasil.
- : Embassy established between Oceania and The Democratic Commonwealth.
- : Embassy cancelled between Organized States of Kappa and Oceania.
- : Embassy cancelled between Terra Magna and Oceania.
- : Embassy cancelled between Rossferry and Oceania.
- : The Constitutional Monarchy of The Sender States of the region Central Area proposed constructing embassies.
- : The Techno-Scientific Empire of Imperio de Jandira of the region Novo Brasil proposed constructing embassies.
- : Cornholyio ceased to exist.
- : The Socialist States of Oceania Founder ordered the closure of embassies between Oceania and Terra Magna.
Oceania Regional Message Board
Thank you very much.
In the 1984 world, I find it interesting that George Orwell never divided Antarctica. Why were claims never placed on it?
As a result of this, as well as the fact that Christmas is fast approaching, I have taken it upon myself to make a map of Antarctica, whereby it is divided accordingly by the largest nation’s in the region.
Like this post if you believe that my borders are good, or write a comment below if you disagree.
Should Antarctica not remain neutral/un colonised but instead have a similar situation that is in the world today with every nation "sharing" Antarctica and keeping it as the worlds last natural wilderness?
In terms of the “real world” in the region, I agree. However, the 1984 world constructed by George Orwell shouldn’t remain neutral. This is largely due to the fact that the world is essentially divided between totalitarian regimes, that of Oceania, Eurasia and Eastasia.
Yes, you can draw parallels between the fact that some terrrories are titled as “disputed” according to Orwell’s narrative. However, by the very nature of the fact that it is called “disputed” means that the other superstates claim it.
I will go back to my original suggestion of the fact that Orwell never made mention of Antarctic claims in his novel, which is a huge opening to expand on the author’s narrative gaps throughout the text: that of claiming Antarctica in the 1984 world.
In short, the 1984 world should be able to claim Antarctica. Orwell’s novel is a basis of fiction that shouldn’t be constraint to the Antarctic Treaty System of the real world. Those who’s nations are based in the “real world” should universally abide by the Treaty, although Spanish Micronesia could change this if necessary.