«12. . .297298299300301302303. . .603604»
You're forgetting Citizens' Program? It's like you Democrats were so happy and uncaring about anyone else till you were knocked down to play like actual human beings. You also seem to forget that the largest reason why we need to bring these reforms in is because the political system became so unfair that it caused the ratio of people involved in politics and those not involved to decrease, allowing less political activity. How did it become so unfair? Because a certain party doesn't know what "community" or "teamwork" is.
New Suternia Brother, It's DEM, the party that Sainoland was from, the party that I've hated since it existed. That was never gonna happen lol.
OvO, 300th page.
Anyways, HAIL THE MAJORITY COALITION: NBP, CTZ, AND GL!
Risastorstein, The evile empire, United soviet states of russian empire, Dependants, and 3 othersVidor, Communaccord, and New Suternia
LCP is completely dead, so for now I’m independent I guess, change your factbooks people.
Risastorstein, The evile empire, Dependants, Ravennog, and 3 othersVidor, Communaccord, and New Suternia
Post self-deleted by Barlonatar.
Most of them are doing it for the meme but Yang raises an important question: what are we going to do when robots and AIs will take over every single job, as they are more productive and cheaper? How can our current system work with this new paradigm? The answer is... it can't.
The only solutions that aren't dystopian are UBI and public ownership.
I mean, hey, at least you're willing to admit that you negotiated in bad faith. Could've saved everyone a deal of time had you not. But I guess the honorable thing is above you.
El Reyno Mexicano and Dependants
Is that meant to be a dig?
Banana man154 and Hulldom
So I have a question, for those who have an issue with the current majority coalition.
I know you guys dislike Nazbol, that much is obvious. I know you guys see this whole thing as a power grab. I have a pretty good idea why, but that’s not really a conversation I can see ending productively.
My question is, what policies specifically do you have a problem with? What about the coalition leaders do you see as untrustworthy, “unprincipled”, and thus making them unfit to lead the senate?
From where I sit, which in your opinion seems to be on the side of ruin and destruction, all I witness is rhetoric that has been stoking partisan hatred towards one another, which reflects poorly on all who engage in it, for the sole reason that in your eyes Nazbol is inherently bad, that CTZ and Green-Left are morally bereft for adopting a fair amount of their policies, while failing to point at what about their policies makes them bad policies.
I challenge you, 
Hulldom and Dependants, to engage in an honest conversation with me and other coalition leaders, and provide some more thoughtful criticism to better illustrate how your principles contrast so sharply with the coalition policies, and better serve the region.
Wether that’s in a more formal setting on Discord or a casual conversation on RMB, that’s entirely up to you.
- Communaccord
Former Chancellor
Former Justice
Green-Left Senator
Risastorstein, The evile empire, Dependants, Ravennog, and 1 otherNew Suternia
Hell yeah, this is going to be good. I'm sticking around here for a while.
Risastorstein, The evile empire, Dependants, Banana man154, and 1 otherCommunaccord
Let's pretend I'm relevant; after a moment to make my decision, I have decided to join NazBol. The Majority Coalition, consisting of NazBol, CTZ, and Green-Left, has already proposed legislation only a few days after the election for the Chancellor, and they have much more of a work-ethic based from my experience in the Democratic Caucus.
The evile empire, Dependants, Communaccord, and New Suternia
Policies I have a problem with:
1. Having the Immigration Director appointed by the Prime Minister and confirmed by the Senate.
2. Creating a state-owned media.
3. Reducing Justices permanently to 3.
4. Making party recognition challengeable in court.
5. Removing the Emperors power to create Departments and expand or reduce the Senate and giving it to the Prime Minister, who must gain consent from the Senate.
6. Forcing Parties to list their candidates before they can run in an election and if they do not manage this not letting them run.
Policies I actually could get behind:
1. Single Transferable Vote by-elections.
2. Abolishing the Supreme Court.
3. Making it easier for citizens to form clubs and associations with the interior ministry.
4. Snap Election Regulations.
5. Having Official Government Announcements made via Discord & Telegram.
As you can see I actually think about half the platform put forward is quite reasonable. However the other half I strongly dislike and think would be detrimental to the region if allowed to go unchallenged, which is where this whole Principled thing comes in.
I have beef with CTZ as a party going into a Coalition with Nazbol not because I have an unreasonable dislike of Nazbol not at all but because I actually do like some of what Nazbol has put forward but not everything, where my issue lies is that form where I'm sitting CTZ has adopted not some but ALL of their policies not challenging anything I don't know if it's because they genuinely support all of them or what but I think it's dangerous and foolish of any party to enter a coalition with anyone conceding to all of the other parties policies. I don't see the benefit CTZ had in forming a Coalition with them at all, I don't know if it's known publically or not but in the talks DEM had with CTZ I in good faith made the decision that if CTZ won the election I would not run for Chancellor and would back an Evile Chancellorship I was fully intending on keeping to this decision until I saw that the coalition was formed, I saw the policies of the Coalition and realised they where all Nazbols and I was appalled as I have stated I think that's ridiculous and seeing how they now have no Principled Opposition I ran for Chancellor to ensure that there was.
If there was Principle in CTZ they wouldn't have adopted all of Nabols policies.
«12. . .297298299300301302303. . .603604»
Advertisement
