LazarusBoard

Just made a new secret factbook project

Bob bobberson wrote:

He will probably just take you over, I will grant you 1000 am96 long bows

I will not take them over remember the treaty that we signed said " Grant peace over all nations" so no I will not take them over.

I am currently at war with Brasillistan

Bob bobberson wrote:

Oh yeah

I'm telling you don't make me start another friggin war over you disagreeing. Oh what's that we got more missiles and soldiers keep em on standby.

Greater east portage wrote:

if anyone around here goes and breaks a treaty, they can expect an HSG-15 City-Wiper Ballistic Missile dropped in their backyard.

isnt MAD a thing tho

Just a little joke Shawtys saying " Cali or Miami for my birthday?" Then end up at buffalo wild wings😆😆😆😆😆

The Great Jelksion Empire wrote:

I'm telling you don't make me start another friggin war over you disagreeing. Oh what's that we got more missiles and soldiers keep em on standby.

I still have more soldiers, budget, weapons, technology, and nuclear weapons then you and laser defense array's

Bob bobberson wrote:

The great question: towed artillery or rocket artillery? What are your opinions

Tactical ballistic missile.

Bob bobberson wrote:

As a support for close combat infantry?

To destroy the enemy's ability to fight. The infantry can fend for themselves with their mortars and vehicle-based direct fire support. And not to forget pointing a laser and getting a 1000 pound bomb dropped right where they want it by air support.

Bob bobberson wrote:

Aren't mortars towed artillery (kinda)

If you consider transporting a metal death tube on a conscript's back towed, perhaps.

Bob bobberson wrote:

The great question: towed artillery or rocket artillery? What are your opinions

How about railguns?

Burikinia wrote:

How about railguns?

I don't think railguns would be good infantry support

Frankender wrote:

When did we become the 2nd most populous region?

Idk