by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

WA Delegate: None.

Founder: The Republic of BCC 30

Last WA Update:

Board Activity History Admin Rank

Nudest: 803rd Most Advanced Law Enforcement: 1,225th Most Advanced Defense Forces: 1,271st+8
Most Advanced Public Transport: 1,373rd Most Secular: 1,781st Largest Black Market: 1,850th Most Eco-Friendly Governments: 2,289th Most Corrupt Governments: 2,406th Longest Average Lifespans: 2,629th Most Extensive Public Healthcare: 2,664th Most Subsidized Industry: 2,666th
World Factbook Entry

As the name suggests... itís for the IWK Supreme Court to decide stuff.



  1. 4

    Supreme Court

    FactbookPolitics by Official Dispatches . 241 reads.

  2. 3

    Warning Tracker Dispatch

    FactbookMiscellaneous by Zarbik . 748 reads.

Embassies: Isle Of Wooloo Kingdom, Institute of Cellulose, Just relax, and The Jewel Robotox Nations.

Tags: Minuscule.

IWK supreme court contains 3 nations.

Today's World Census Report

The Largest Soda Pop Sector in IWK supreme court

The World Census recorded sales of fizzy syrup water in order to determine which nations have the largest beverage industries.

As a region, IWK supreme court is ranked 18,766th in the world for Largest Soda Pop Sector.

NationWA CategoryMotto
1.The Melon Supreme Court Puppet of DogelandInoffensive Centrist Democracy“I denounce Venice”
2.The Rogue Nation of Simba WorldPsychotic Dictatorship“To Dream for Freedom is Wrong”
3.The Republic of BCC 30Moralistic Democracy“Justice, Piety, Loyalty”

Regional Happenings

More...

IWK supreme court Regional Message Board

Augsburg-Fugger wrote:On request by Untecna, I am here to argue my case for my unbanning from the Institute of Cellulose. I was banned for suspection of being an alt. Frankly, I don't really know how this works, so pardon any mistakes I might make. I will go through a list of reasons for why I personally think I should be unbanned.

1: It has been around half a year since my banning, and I (to my knowledge) was never given a formal ban length.
The most obvious defense, It has been a very long time. Besides the commitment that I believe a simple alt would never show, I also do not remember being given a length. I assume it was a Permaban, but I don't know.

2: I did, or tried, most everything asked of me to prove my innocence.
I joined the WA, I sent a GHR asking for a list of my alts, as requested by an RO (That request was denied and I was never given such a list). The only thing I don't recall doing is join a VC to argue my case, for my own privacy. I personally think that if I did everything asked, and am still banned, then there was never a way for me to not get banned, which is unfair.

3: I have insofar been steadfast in my defense, which a simple alt would likely not do.
I argued with ROs for weeks, possibly a few months if you include my short unbanning. An alt would not go through with all that work for no reason.

4: I have nothing but good intentions to henceforth follow all rules of the region, and be an upstanding citizen of the IOC.
While not a direct defense of myself, I do hope that you'll trust me when I say I have no ill will to any person in this region, or the region itself. I simply want to have fun. And yes, Maybe it's a tiny bit of spite, wanting to prove that I was always innocent, but that isn't harmful. I will try my hardest not to break any rules,

I know I caused quite a ruckus last time, Trust me, I felt it too, but I hope you'll consider my case. I hope this is convincing enough. Thank you.

I wish to inquire further on your 2nd point there. Could you tell me more about it?

Untecna wrote:I wish to inquire further on your 2nd point there. Could you tell me more about it?

To be fair, I wasn't asked much, but I feel that's more because there's not much you can do to prove that on NS. With the other 2, I joined the WA after either my own hope to prove others or the request of Orange Creek. I do not remember. I was asked by NAIS to send a GHR to the mods, to give me a list of my alts. I did, but they denied it. I believe it was something about Privacy. One of the mods (Maybe KOE?) asked me to join a VC in the discord to prove I was a unique person. I did not do it because of various reasons such as Privacy and a semi-dislike of my voice.
Hope this helps.

Augsburg-Fugger wrote:To be fair, I wasn't asked much, but I feel that's more because there's not much you can do to prove that on NS. With the other 2, I joined the WA after either my own hope to prove others or the request of Orange Creek. I do not remember. I was asked by NAIS to send a GHR to the mods, to give me a list of my alts. I did, but they denied it. I believe it was something about Privacy. One of the mods (Maybe KOE?) asked me to join a VC in the discord to prove I was a unique person. I did not do it because of various reasons such as Privacy and a semi-dislike of my voice.
Hope this helps.

Hm. And do you have a link or some sort of connection to the official ban statement? That might help with the first concern.

Untecna wrote:Hm. And do you have a link or some sort of connection to the official ban statement? That might help with the first concern.

After searching IOC's RMB, I genuinely do not think there ever was an official ban statement. I was talking, then I was banned, then I came back, then I was banned. I see no ban statement for either. Sorry.

Augsburg-Fugger wrote:After searching IOC's RMB, I genuinely do not think there ever was an official ban statement. I was talking, then I was banned, then I came back, then I was banned. I see no ban statement for either. Sorry.

Alright. Well, I'm running a trawl of our RMB to confirm, and at least gain some insight.

Do note that I will be bringing all of this to my associate judges as well. I will make sure to get an opinion written up, though, once we have decided.

Untecna wrote:Alright. Well, I'm running a trawl of our RMB to confirm, and at least gain some insight.

Do note that I will be bringing all of this to my associate judges as well. I will make sure to get an opinion written up, though, once we have decided.

Again, thank you very much for hearing me. Have a great day.

Augsburg-Fugger

https://pdfhost.io/v/oqLNcYScf_IOC_Supreme_Court_Opinion___Case_No__1

Here is the opinion.

Untecna wrote:Augsburg-Fugger

https://pdfhost.io/v/oqLNcYScf_IOC_Supreme_Court_Opinion___Case_No__1

Here is the opinion.

Thank you very much. If you have any more questions or concerns regarding my case, then please ask, I'd rather have a fully exhaustive, correct court case then what might turn out to be a nonexhaustive, incorrect one.

Augsburg-Fugger wrote:Thank you very much. If you have any more questions or concerns regarding my case, then please ask, I'd rather have a fully exhaustive, correct court case then what might turn out to be a nonexhaustive, incorrect one.

I have ruled that you are unbanned. You may return to the region when you wish.

Untecna wrote:I have ruled that you are unbanned. You may return to the region when you wish.

I'll do so in around half an hour. Gotta do stuff right now. Again, thanks.

Forum View

Advertisement