by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .22,39222,39322,39422,39522,39622,39722,398. . .27,90127,902»

The only just war is the war against socci-alism

Corosky

St Scarlett wrote:They do because Russia moved a bunch of Russians in through history to keep the area loyal.

Well crap...

The New Nordic Union wrote:Except condemning it as the atrocity it was

I don't think many If any people knew at the time how bad they were.

The New Nordic Union wrote:By attacking innocents.
No it didn't 'need' to do that, that's just the USAmerican excuse.

Innocents die in war, tragic but it is what it is
Also you have clear bias against America, if you truly cared about innocent civilians of hateful regimes then why not bring up the atrocities committed against the German population by both the British and Russians?

Rivierenland, Corosky, Nono germani, and People korea

Italia viva wrote:The only just war is the war against socci-alism

I think the phrase you are looking for is complete government control

The new mexican confederation wrote:Innocents die in war, tragic but it is what it is
Also you have clear bias against America, if you truly cared about innocent civilians of hateful regimes then why not bring up the atrocities committed against the German population by both the British and Russians?

And because 'it is what it is' that's okay?

As a German with family that has suffered greatly from Nazis and Soviets, I can assure you, I am not silent on this issue. However, the post that started all was talking about Japan, hence this discussion. And, well, none of the countries you mentioned used the strongest form of a weapon of mass destruction.

Italia viva wrote:The only just war is the war against socci-alism

Ok buddy

Nono germani and People korea

Almion wrote:Ok buddy

ok, bolshevik.

The new mexican confederation

The New Nordic Union wrote:And because 'it is what it is' that's okay?

As a German with family that has suffered greatly from Nazis and Soviets, I can assure you, I am not silent on this issue. However, the post that started all was talking about Japan, hence this discussion. And, well, none of the countries you mentioned used the strongest form of a weapon of mass destruction.

It is never okay, therefore why I think the defeat of japan was necessary, they themselves deliberately targeted civilians wherever they conquered.
And regardless if weapon of mass destruction or not, civilians died didnt they?

Rivierenland and Nono germani

People korea wrote:ok, bolshevik.

Said the socialist to the other socialist

Nono germani

The new mexican confederation wrote:It is never okay, therefore why I think the defeat of japan was necessary, they themselves deliberately targeted civilians wherever they conquered.
And regardless if weapon of mass destruction or not, civilians died didnt they?

I never doubted the defeat was necessary, just the bombs on civilians.

Almion wrote:Said the socialist to the other socialist

We believe in Juche idea.

The New Nordic Union wrote:I never doubted the defeat was necessary, just the bombs on civilians.

It was either that or a full scale invasion
I think the choice with less casualties is preferable
Especially since the US probably would’ve committed way more crimes on the Japanese homeland knowing what they did to the French.

Rivierenland and Nono germani

People korea wrote:We believe in Juche idea.

We believe in Jesus.

Yahlia, Rivierenland, The new mexican confederation, and People korea

The new mexican confederation wrote:It was either that or a full scale invasion
I think the choice with less casualties is preferable
Especially since the US probably would’ve committed way more crimes on the Japanese homeland knowing what they did to the French.

As Laver said above much more in depth, the war was already basically over. The atomic bombs were unnecessary.

THEY'RE TURNING THE FREAKING FROGS GAY!!!

People korea wrote:THEY'RE TURNING THE FREAKING FROGS GAY!!!

You can't turn something gay it either is or it isn't

NorthPortugal, Rivierenland, and Nono germani

St Scarlett wrote:It is kinda more peaceful though. Think about how at one point all of Europe was constantly at war with itself, meanwhile tribes and nations and empires across Asia, Africa and the Americas were also raging war.

The Cold War period was pretty rough too.

I’d say this is thanks to organisations like the UN. We have more motive than ever to work together and solve issues through diplomacy rather than through war.

Idk un kinda let the rwanda genocide slide so yeah.....
Also why is it when a cop got killed it will never be on the news like the case of corporal brian la vigne who was intentionaly rammed to death and what's disgusting is people in the comment say the guy who killed the officer is a hero, karma and serves him right it's just sickening 😖

The New Nordic Union wrote:As Laver said above much more in depth, the war was already basically over. The atomic bombs were unnecessary.

Soviet invasion was a major factor, not the deciding one.

Bathera, Rivierenland, Corosky, and Nono germani

Bathera wrote:Is she a good candidate?

I still have no idea who is this she. There were only male candidates from this party in the ballot

The only thing the bombs did accomplish was to fasten the end of the war (which was already ending, Japan was de facto already defetead), avoid a shared occupation of the USA and URSS (like Korea or Vietnam) and kill a lot of civillians. While we could argue and debate that prolonging the war would have been worse and that avoiding a third split state was a great accomplishment given the past and current situation of Korea and Vietnam, arguing in favor of war crimes and atrocities is sussy baka and, also, against our rules.

Thracia and Crimea, The New Nordic Union, Yahlia, Laver Island, and 8 othersThe Oriental Empire, Rivierenland, Libertandonien, Gliesetonia, New skandenivia, The new mexican confederation, Corosky, and Nono germani

Libertandonien

The New Nordic Union wrote:Oh but was ist not the Chinese's fault for waging war against Japan and not surrendering? After all, they waged a war and reaped the consequences. Just following your 'logic'.
On top of that, I highly doubt civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were doing anything in China.

the Japanese population was, just like the German one, manipulated by party leaders, military officers and etc. to commit those crimes for the sake of the emperor and the Kaiserreich

The New Nordic Union, Yahlia, Bathera, Rivierenland, and 2 othersCorosky, and Nono germani

Overdressed everywhere > underdressed everywhere

Post by Galway-Dublin suppressed by a moderator.

Einswenn wrote:I still have no idea who is this she. There were only male candidates from this party in the ballot

So, i quickly searched up the news broadcast of yesterday and i found the name of the politician in question: Anna Tsjerapanova

According to NPO 1, she's the leader of Yabloko. Whether the NPO is wrong or not, i don't know, so i'm just going to assume it is correct

Me when amogus

«12. . .22,39222,39322,39422,39522,39622,39722,398. . .27,90127,902»

Advertisement