«12. . .172173174175176177178. . .269270»
Rosie O'Donnell (screaming liberal twit) went on Twitter to offer two US senators $2 million each to vote against the Republican backed tax bill[1]. Numerous people are now pointing out that attempting to bribe a senator is medium range federal crime.
What do you think? Was this tongue in cheek bitching or does Rosie need to go down for a felony?
Merry free market Christmas to one and all
Phrontisteries and Xyanth
Merry Christmas from the Federation of Conservative Nations!
Reed audio, Phrontisteries, and Xyanth
Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all - even to Rosie (once she has got out of whatever Rest Home her lawyers put in as Temporary Insanity defence for the crime of trying to bribe Senators).
As for bodies Corporate - if someone says that unions and charitable foundations (such as the ones Mr Soros funds) should not be allowed to be involved in politics, then they have some consistency in demanding that business enterprises not be allowed to get involved in politics. But if someone wants unions and charitable foundations to be allowed to campaign on political issues, but wants to forbid business enterprises the same rights - then they are just hypocrites and should be despised.
TENDIES OR NUGS? VOTE HERE : page=poll/p=109185
The f***? I allowed abortions, but it brought my civil rights rating down. That doesn’t make sense.
Many aspects of this game are counter intuitive.
Rant and rave on the RMB for the most part.
Post by New waldensia suppressed by a moderator.
Evidently I can't crack a joke about "giving up lowercase letters" and becoming "A CAPITALIST" without getting warned for "spamming".
Nice
The region info says no spamming, so don't be shocked.
I am no fan of the "Moderators" either - they tend to be leftists pushing a de facto political agenda, under the mask of keeping discussion "civil". They tend to hit people who want less government (a smaller state), far more than people who want bigger government - "Social Justice" and the rest of that evil garbage.
Phrontisteries and Xyanth
Once again the WA is trying to micro-manage our nations. if you are a WA member, might want to vote against the current WA resolution, "Protection Of Biomedical Research."
It seems that all one needs is a single, uncorroborated allegation of sexual misconduct to blow a career out of the water. Whether that career be in entertainment, sports, law enforcement, or corporate America, if just one person screams "He did [fill in misconduct here] to me," the sociaal justice lynch mob shifts into high gear and persecutes the individual, his work, and even his family. It matters not whether or not the accused denies the charges. Nor does the matter of even the slightest shred of proof seem to enter into the equation.
I was wondering if anyone else finds the lack of due process shown the for the accused as disturbing as I do.
The WA is on the green thing again. If you are a WA member, take a moment to vote against the latest resolution: Ozone Layer Protection
Imren, Oakplumington, and Victornia
I'm with you. I'm glad that we live in a culture where victims feel that the can speak up, but it also bugs me that people abuse this new system of speaking out as a way to hurt people they don't like or to boost their own name. A few of the people that have fallen are actual creeps, but most of these cases seem fake. At the very least, they aren't all criminal. People need to distinguish between a pig and a criminal.
«12. . .172173174175176177178. . .269270»
Advertisement