by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .24252627282930. . .3233»

Onionist Randosia wrote:don’t you mean
nyet, nyet, nyeeeeet

Nyet, I mean NO, that is not what I meant!

Post self-deleted by PSR.

It's disgusting how many neo nazis go under our noses because we don't know their dogwhistles.
Here are some common ones
TND/Totally Nice Day means "Total N word death"
TMD/Totally Magnificent Day means "Total migrant death"
TJD/Totally Joyful Day = "Total Jew Death"
Just watch out for these and stay safe

Telphore wrote:ello. i have joined. getting a handle on this game. it very much feels like it was made by a libertarian in terms of how the in-system biases work, ngl.

Welcome to the land of the northern lights!

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:It's disgusting how many neo nazis go under our noses because we don't know their dogwhistles.
Here are some common ones
TND/Totally Nice Day means "Total N word death"
TMD/Totally Magnificent Day means "Total migrant death"
TJD/Totally Joyful Day = "Total Jew Death"
Just watch out for these and stay safe

Thanks for the information, really appreciated

The kaisers armchair wrote:back again

Welcome back!

Gorbachev opinions?

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Gorbachev opinions?

He was just kinda dumb, I feel

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Gorbachev opinions?

He tried.
That is all I have to say on the subject.

Onionist Randosia wrote:He tried.
That is all I have to say on the subject.

Pretty much, I mean sure he ended the Cold War, but also killed the world's strongest superpower in the process. So yeah, a participation award I suppose.

All I'm gonna say is that after he made his reforms, people became happier. And considering that the people fled West, I don't think it was a bad thing.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Gorbachev opinions?

One of the enemies of humankind, a useful idiot and powerless puppet of Yakovlev and similar corrupt bureaucrats who tore the workers' state apart for their own financial gain. Dozens of millions died and two dozen countries turned from industrial powerhouses into failed desolate wastelands, spawning freely-roaming fascists. Humankind's general progress was set back for two hundred years, and the international workers' organizations - completely devastated. The bourgeoisie reigns free, free to ravage the people and massacre the oppressed more than ever in the last century.
The hell doesn't exist, but if it did, I hope Gorbachev burns bright there.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:All I'm gonna say is that after he made his reforms, people became happier. And considering that the people fled West, I don't think it was a bad thing.

. . .

Volksleben wrote:One of the enemies of humankind, a useful idiot and powerless puppet of Yakovlev and similar corrupt bureaucrats who tore the workers' state apart for their own financial gain. Dozens of millions died and two dozen countries turned from industrial powerhouses into failed desolate wastelands, spawning freely-roaming fascists. Humankind's general progress was set back for two hundred years, and the international workers' organizations - completely devastated. The bourgeoisie reigns free, free to ravage the people and massacre the oppressed more than ever in the last century.
The hell doesn't exist, but if it did, I hope Gorbachev burns bright there.

Go ahead and put a dunce cap on him for us, maybe a neon sign that says "Anti-Communist" on it.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:All I'm gonna say is that after he made his reforms, people became happier. And considering that the people fled West, I don't think it was a bad thing.

Why are you even here? You don't support our goals, you don't support the workers, the only thing you support is corrupted capitalism and war crimes committed by imperialists. Out of all the Soviet Leaders, you love the one who set back years of progress towards the world revolution. There really is no reason for you to be here, unless you wanna take up the role of The Court Jester.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:All I'm gonna say is that after he made his reforms, people became happier. And considering that the people fled West, I don't think it was a bad thing.

If they became happier because of his reforms, then why did they overthrow him?

New Tyranniaa wrote:If they became happier because of his reforms, then why did they overthrow him?

because they were sick of communism and didn't elect another communist and instead electing a capitalist

Union of Soviet State Republics wrote:Go ahead and put a dunce cap on him for us, maybe a neon sign that says "Anti-Communist" on it.

Ohh I'm so scared of being anti communist oh my god worse than hitler

Union of Soviet State Republics wrote:Why are you even here? You don't support our goals, you don't support the workers, the only thing you support is corrupted capitalism and war crimes committed by imperialists. Out of all the Soviet Leaders, you love the one who set back years of progress towards the world revolution. There really is no reason for you to be here, unless you wanna take up the role of The Court Jester.

Yes but you fail to mention that the Eastern bloc hated the USSR and rejoiced when it was broken and how the east berliners didn't stay in East Berlin, how all the other SSRs wanted to leave and how the russian PEOPLE elected a capitalist supporter. I think the court jester here is you for using personal attacks in a friendly debate

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Ohh I'm so scared of being anti communist oh my god worse than hitler
Yes but you fail to mention that the Eastern bloc hated the USSR and rejoiced when it was broken and how the east berliners didn't stay in East Berlin, how all the other SSRs wanted to leave and how the russian PEOPLE elected a capitalist supporter. I think the court jester here is you for using personal attacks in a friendly debate

We treat both Capitalists and Fascists as enemies. read our tags, ANTI-CAPITALIST and ANTI-FASCIST. I knew you weren't exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, but why are you in a COMMUNIST region if you aren't even communist?

Of course they hated the USSR, the last few dictators that ran it were terrible, such as your precious Gorbachev. If they had someone like Tito running the show, you wouldn't have these problems. The last few leaders were corrupt and ineffective, they weren't fighting for the revolution, they were fighting to line their pockets. Something you clearly support. If I had to guess, you are amongst those who profit off of those who are barely struggling to survive. And this is no friendly debate, you are blatantly insulting the very ideas upon which we stand. Go put on the hat, I officially dub you the Jester of the region. carry it with pride, it's all you'll have before the Supreme Soviet finally has enough of you and throws you out. Either that or you'll cower away like last time.

Union of Soviet State Republics wrote:We treat both Capitalists and Fascists as enemies. read our tags, ANTI-CAPITALIST and ANTI-FASCIST. I knew you weren't exactly the sharpest tool in the shed, but why are you in a COMMUNIST region if you aren't even communist?

Of course they hated the USSR, the last few dictators that ran it were terrible, such as your precious Gorbachev. If they had someone like Tito running the show, you wouldn't have these problems. The last few leaders were corrupt and ineffective, they weren't fighting for the revolution, they were fighting to line their pockets. Something you clearly support. If I had to guess, you are amongst those who profit off of those who are barely struggling to survive. And this is no friendly debate, you are blatantly insulting the very ideas upon which we stand. Go put on the hat, I officially dub you the Jester of the region. carry it with pride, it's all you'll have before the Supreme Soviet finally has enough of you and throws you out. Either that or you'll cower away like last time.

Communism is great -> Corrupt leaders are easily made in the communist system -> Someone tries to fix this system by encouraging reforms, freeing the people and allowing the people to choose -> Communism is great and those idiots should be beheaded.
This is how you sound. If my aunt had balls she'd be my uncle, but she doesn't and she's not. Everyone would have supported communism if all leaders were Titos, but not all leaders are Titos and hence no one support communism. Also unless I'm an idiot and I just missed it, nothing in this region says that "We strive to be an echo chamber where everyone agrees with each other and no one ever questions anyone's beliefs"
Also, are you saying that people were happier during Stalin's rule than they were in Gorbachev or Khruschev's?
By the way, you still ignored the Eastern bloc question. Are you going to run crying to your buddy Volksleben to help you in a debate that you started?

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:because they were sick of communism and didn't elect another communist and instead electing a capitalist

They were so sick of communism that the capitalist they "elected" bombed the actually elected Parliament and rolled the tanks over the protesting civilians when they tried to resist the breakneck liberal reforms screaming "all power to the Soviets, away with mafia!"

Volksleben wrote:They were so sick of communism that the capitalist they "elected" bombed the actually elected Parliament and rolled the tanks over the protesting civilians when they tried to resist the breakneck liberal reforms screaming "all power to the Soviets, away with mafia!"

Does that invalidate the fact that he was voted in fairly (not cheated in like you seem to think)? Also, the civilians weren't opposed to the reforms being liberal; It was because it caused literal fighting and death on the streets. The people were fine with his economic shock therapy, they were against the formation of a possible civil war

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Communism is great -> Corrupt leaders are easily made in the communist system -> Someone tries to fix this system by encouraging reforms, freeing the people and allowing the people to choose -> Communism is great and those idiots should be beheaded.

It rather was:
Socialism is doing okay -> Marxism-Leninism is abandoned because "Stalin bad" -> Khrushchev's market reforms, the Soviet economy enters stagnation, corruption skyrockets -> Corruption is not persecuted because "we are not Stalin" -> A mindless puppet of the corrupt bureaucracy comes to power, ruins everything under the guise of "Democratic Socialism" -> People are ready to support anything that isn't status quo at this point -> Yeltsin/Kravchuk/Corrupt-Bureaucrat-No.1231 comes, promising everything to everyone, wins, does nothing to fix the situation -> The former republics turn into de-industrialized unsustainable chauvinist hellholes with their State Apparatuses 10 times larger than the entire Soviet one under Stalin -> THE REFORMS WERE OBJECTIVELY GOOD! FREEDOM! PEOPLE! DEMOCRACY!

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Everyone would have supported communism if all leaders were Titos, but not all leaders are Titos and hence no one support communism.

IMF LOAN IMF LOAN IMF LOAN IMF LOAN IMF LOAN IMF LOAN IMF LOAN

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Also unless I'm an idiot and I just missed it, nothing in this region says that "We strive to be an echo chamber where everyone agrees with each other and no one ever questions anyone's beliefs"

Buddy, that's the entire point of regions - to be groups of common interest, where people with similar outlooks, similar tastes, or similar ideas can hang out.
Try propagating radical republican views in a monarchist region, I'll see how fast you are banned.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Also, are you saying that people were happier during Stalin's rule than they were in Gorbachev or Khruschev's?

Well, there was no war and famine during Khrushchev's rule.
Under Gorbachev - well, it was the only time when the ration stamps were introduced during peacetime.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:By the way, you still ignored the Eastern bloc question. Are you going to run crying to your buddy Volksleben to help you in a debate that you started?

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Yes but you fail to mention that the Eastern bloc hated the USSR and rejoiced when it was broken

Everyone rejoiced when the socialist system fell, only to find out that life is way worse now and they cannot do anything with it since the liberal system is way less democratic than the Soviets were.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:and how the east berliners didn't stay in East Berlin

You'd migrate to a richer place one kilometer away too. Not many consider the amount of Western investment done to make it a big luxurious-looking FREEDOM™ land though.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:how all the other SSRs wanted to leave

Yep, it certainly was PEOPLE, DEMOCRACY, FREEDOM, and not local elites represented by the local SSRs' leaders or nouveau-riche oligarchs - with them totally not suspiciously becoming presidents after independence, sometimes for life.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:and how the russian PEOPLE elected a capitalist supporter.

Only to try overthrowing him after 2 years of a bright liberal future with mafia clans grabbing and robbing everything through accelerated market reforms.
Also, I like this emphasis on the PEOPLE. We do love denying the objective division of society and of the class interests tearing it apart.

17. Use words like ‘freedom’ and ‘democracy’ constantly. Do not accept any challenge to define these terms.
- 40 helpful tips for Anti-Communists

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:I think the court jester here is you for using personal attacks in a friendly debate

"Friendly debate"?
Boy, I sensed "I wish all you tankies died, oh my gosh I am so right and based" energy in your very first message here.

Republic Of Ludwigsburg wrote:Does that invalidate the fact that he was voted in fairly (not cheated in like you seem to think)? Also, the civilians weren't opposed to the reforms being liberal; It was because it caused literal fighting and death on the streets. The people were fine with his economic shock therapy, they were against the formation of a possible civil war

Lmao. The people literally stood opposed EXACTLY to the shock therapy policies. Did you even read the prerequisites to the 1992-1993 Constitutional Crisis?

«12. . .24252627282930. . .3233»

Advertisement