10000 IslandsBoard

Porymonia wrote:

what are you talking about =)

Hmmmmmm maybe the “situation” on ATA? A while ago, but still

Woonsocket wrote:

Great poll question, Jabberwocky!

One has to acquaint one's self in a logorrhoeic manner, in such, to make one's self adhere to the incoherence of such a rambling use of the English language.

hello! im just exploring differnet regions.

the WA is having a war?

Zidium wrote:

hello! im just exploring differnet regions.

I am doing the same.

It seems like a vote to ban blood sports. Seems reasonable to me, or is there a lot of argument over that?

I tried to go onto it and just got lost with what was going on. Forum isn't very user-freindly

Alleida wrote:

I changed my vote from "against" to "for"

I just default to the vote made by the Delegate for the region.

I do sometimes go against the region on some proposals where I have actually read it

In regards to the current WA Vote;

A legality challenge was lodged by a Nation earlier on the grounds of duplication of certain parts of existing WA Resolutions.

This challenge has not been upheld by the Secretariat

Pianaville wrote:

since the option of "being able to copy others' powers" (*cough* ditto) doesn't exist, i went with "being in two places at the same time". twice the efficiency for working, or being able to play two player games against yourself.

I'm limited to 12 choices. I, too, had a couple of other ideas in mind.

Geonomia wrote:

I mostly vote against the GA because we all know the GA is the most elitist thing on this game.
The SC is just corrupt and petty as hell

The WA is controlled by a select few corrupt bureaucrats who do what they wish-at the cost of international sovereignty. Mostly WA delegates, they can get your proposal to pass or fail at their pleasure.