Post

I'm decidedly against violent coercion by any means, even as an implicit 'aid' for the state's monopoly on violence, any kind of coercive and positivist inspired reign of terrors ought to be nipped in the bud. It's a statist convention, its why fascists and state capitalists focus on the maximal concentration of force rather than on deconstructing the thoughtforms which lead people to believe political action undertaken by violent change is legitimate. As there is no basis in this game for nonviolence however, we are confrontational because it means nothing of real value is actually lost in the symbolic jousts for regions. It is inherently non-violent, if Black Bloc were in real life however it'd endorse a Comrade's action to take direct action against capitalists, but not in any Marxist/Blanquist attempts to overturn state in order to become solidified intensified red state which magically withers away.

Aint it the way of things after all, that after you build a house the foundation withers away, the timbers themselves which form the frame? If the house is built with such supports it cannot do with removing them, theyre a part of its structure and essence. We Anarchists are non-euclidean social architects, we don't believe in the fascism of formalism. A structure built rotten no matter how its painted will always be rotten and on borrowed time. A structure built on the same decaying precepts as the society it aims to replace is bound to follow same pattern. Let us live in tents, not houses. :D