Post

Dalmyria wrote:

I still don't think it should be within one's own jurisdiction to decide, but since it only affects the provisions of this resolution and not domestic legal definitions it's fine, I guess. You have persuaded me on 2d. As for article 4, I am prepared to go with that interpretation of 'discrimination', even though I understand the word more broadly. I think the resolution intends that we go with your interpretation :-)

So, a single person can't decide or tell that a symptom they are experiencing is keeping them from performing everyday activities? Not that I favor the word "jurisdiction" in the proposal, but that's what they picked for whatever reason.