Post

HumanSanity wrote:

It would be hard to do so, and in my opinion this resolution can't really be written in a way that I'd support. N-G has made a huge contribution to the site, but the Dark Theme is considered non-admissible per SC rules as something that is similar to a "staff contribution". Some people argue it's unfair to exclude it, but ultimately the mod created rules are the rules to some extent, and I'm a bit wary about voting for this because of the dangling "well they did do the Dark Theme" argument.

I will say, of all WA resolutions, this is not one where I'm particularly strong-willed. I'm pretty set in my convictions and happy to talk about it, but no judgement or larger disagreement rests with those who disagree with me--reasonable minds can disagree on this and that's OK

I mean, maybe it's just me, but they could have focused more about the nominee's other actions on-site. Their most famous contribution is the registry of national capitals, leaders, etc. which I find very important (proof: just how recognizable it is) but they drag it on and on while including cringy references to "teehee they made the dark theme, get it?". Yes, I do get it, but it does not make for a well-written resolution.