My goodness, I was getting all my thoughts together and rereading everything and Natalie swoops in with another great response. I agree with basically everything said.
Something I would add is that a quick look at the thread (viewtopic.php?f=9&t=493789) for this shows a lot of the issues coming up there. I don't think I see a single post really supporting the repeal as written, and I think it would have been better for Honeydew to bump the thread and ask for more feedback. Every response was either addressing something incorrect in the text, or straight up making the arguments Wally would use later in the legality challenge (unaddressed by the author).
The repeal text is sloppy and didn't get nearly enough time in drafting to fix those issues (the thread hasn't had a response since five days after it was originally posted, and GAR#520 was only passed 16 days ago besides). I'll be voting against as soon as it hits the floor in an hour.