by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Post

Region: the South Pacific

Delthorensdale wrote:
On the poll:
I have no problem with what other people choose to do unless it infringes on the rights of others.

I want those choices to be informed, which means carefully documenting the chemical levels and health repercussion.
I want those choices to be made freely, which means allowing small businesses to compete and fill the gaps in variety that larger ones don't offer.
These things are always suppressed without government oversight and intervention, without exception.
Therefore, it is in the best interest of the people for any substance that does not pose a public health or safety hazard to be "legal" in some capacity, albeit regulated.
However, because marijuana releases airborne chemicals, it should only be allowed on private property with permission from the owner, to prevent non-consensual inhalation.

Partially why I chose not to lodge a vote.

Lily pad nation and East lodge

ContextReport