by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Post

Region: Forest

Mount Seymour wrote:This would unquestionably the worst outcome of this debate. We need to come to some sort of change.

You understand how the constitution works. Either I put a change forward or it needs the public support of approximately 25 WA members in order to come to vote (a big ask). We have a large number of varied suggestions, most if not all of which are strongly opposed by multiple people. We also have a clear feeling that it would be a bad thing for me to use my position to trample over the objections of others. I started this process to see if there was an achievable consensus. It appears there is not.

So how about this? If anyone drafts a proposed constitional change I'll put it to an informal vote open to everyone. If it gets a 2/3 majority in that vote then I'll formally propose it for ratification by WA members as per the full process for amending the constitution.

I'll also gladly advise anyone working on a draft on how to word their ammendment so that it achieves what they want it to achieve, on the proviso that the drafting happens by telegram or on the forum rather than filling up the RMB.

I think at this point if any of these ideas is going anywhere we need to see the detail rather than just dozens of outline suggestions.

The new bluestocking homeland, Mount Seymour, Ruinenlust, Lord Dominator, and 8 othersAeterno tranquillitas, Rejectionville, Turbeaux, Canaltia, Seagull, Cosona, Syllabun, and Rivienland

ContextReport