Just concerned that influence is so skewed by WA membership/other activities it's not measuring what we think it's measuring - long term commitment to Forest.
Do we want to really be ruling folks out for not being long term committed anyway? Dunno.
1 month seems fairer to me but a pain to check. Not sure that we need to do this anyway - might be more democratic to make it easier for Forestians to remove an embassy - which seems more in keeping with the way we do stuff.