Post

Libertarian Australia wrote:

I understand what you mean talking about demsocs, and I agree when you say that their spats should not affect us. But, I would like to ask you, what do you prefer? An embassy with a region founded by someone who abused their powers or a region with people who haven't still abused them? I still think that having embassies with both is not incompatible, but I wouldn't dare to put them at the same level.

of course, we should take each case on it's own merits. And in this case the only knowledge of these abuses are the words of an admitted rival community of demsocs. I appreciate them letting us know, but we don't even know what happened. I'm not sure how much I can judge one side against the other without more knowledge of the situation. So i have to fall back on the knowledge I do have, that they are both demsocs.

That being said why don't we have an embassy with both? We should have embassies with all the NSLeft members shouldn't we?