Region: The Leftist Assembly
You mistaken experience simply as holding these positions. That isn't experience. Experience is both holding these important positions and actually executing their responsibilities, and considering this is an election for Secretary, it is going beyond that and contributing more to the region. You were basically never, throughout the past six months that I have worked with you in the GA, active in GA discussion and have consistently had long periods of inactivity during the term. I should also find it relevant to mention that I was preparing with Cedoria to begin a minister replacement process just before the last election as you nearly went inactive. This kind of inactivity has been repeated several times with weeks where not a comment has been heard from you and my dossier tells me the same thing. This sort of trend is extremely troubling.
Regardless if your internet went down during that particularly unfortunate time, the times that you did get online you simply did nothing and completely stalled the process. Your allegations here are simply false. Trying to not waste time in discussing a bill so as to spare time for future proposals, of which they were queuing during the time that you took to finally get it through, is not being "extremely brash". I do tend to be very active, which is why I try to get things through at a fast pace, and I don't exactly see this as an undesirable quality in a Secretary. In fact, this is something that you tend to have the complete opposite of.
Electing a Secretary requires a level of trust in the person elected. This is why we have vigorous elections to determine who can hold this esteemed position. Think about it, what are the repercussions for the founders if they were to randomly banject a completely innocent native nation? We also place a level of trust in them. I think that perhaps shortening the maximum time frame that a Secretary can host a SoE without judicial authority would be a good idea, which is what you have proposed, but you have also suggested that they still be subject to regional law. Had you proposed to rid the region of the SoEPA in its entirety, this would make sense, but the fact that you have proposed to keep it and implement this change creates the very loophole I previously described.
You don't think it because you probably aren't very aware, if at all, what the Solidarity Pact actually is. I've mentioned this several times on the RMB, perhaps you simply ignored them or glanced straight over, but I happen to maintain the region member dispatch of this very pact. What TSP grants us is mutual interregional diplomatic relations and military defence, as well as offering us a space to communicate with other regions via The Internationale's offline forum. I believe that we have not quite involved ourselves in this and that we should strive to improve in the area.
I do not exactly deny that there is nothing of real note in my policies, bar the abolition of The Diplomatic Corps, because I, very simply, wish to maintain the status quo in large part. I believe that Secretary Cedoria has led our region down a great path and I would like to continue to following a similar direction if elected as Secretary of the Assembly. On the other hand for your 'policies', you have a loophole proposal and a redundant 'plan' to close up OTHER loopholes.