by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .24,49824,49924,50024,50124,50224,50324,504. . .24,52224,523»

Reann wrote:fa**ot)

Me stating I like fa**ots in gravy and smoking fags opens up a whole new kettle of fish ...

Edit: Despite it being a legitimate word in English, I'm not allowed to use it. Stupid American English.

Konstansin Empire wrote:Is there someone that I can be enemy with in the Southern Sea ?

We can be rival; and depending on the history of my nation and yours, we can decide how intense the rivalry persist up to the present day

Verska wrote:We can be rival; and depending on the history of my nation and yours, we can decide how intense the rivalry persist up to the present day

Depends on how your nation is structured : mine Is similar to the British, Russian and Byzantine Empires. We are highly militaristic and aggressive

Great Altera wrote:Me stating I like fa**ots in gravy and smoking fags opens up a whole new kettle of fish ...

Edit: Despite it being a legitimate word in English, I'm not allowed to use it. Stupid American English.

we apologize but not really get bent murcia #1

Konstansin Empire wrote:Depends on how your nation is structured : mine Is similar to the British, Russian and Byzantine Empires. We are highly militaristic and aggressive

I draw inspiration from a lot of cultures, but I'm heavily inspired by the Ottoman Empire. We are almost the opposite in other area too

Verska is not militaristic nor aggresive in a sense that Verska may need to be provoked into military action. If Muslim or Verskan that live in foreign soil are threatened and diplomacy fail, only then will the nation get to military action

So I guess we have good reason to be rival nation. If you'd like for us to detail it out further, let me know in the telegrams!

Well I made a false promise about making a new news story. And I apologize about it, despite it's something that usually happens especially with things related to time I can use to this game

Novorijeka wrote:Well I made a false promise about making a new news story. And I apologize about it, despite it's something that usually happens especially with things related to time I can use to this game

no worries, no need to rush to make a news post. i’ve been telling Yursea i’ll get one ready for them for…several days now ;)

Post self-deleted by Yektov.

Post self-deleted by Yektov.

Shidei wrote:This is the same reason why "hate the sin, love the sinner" is almost if not more toxic and hateful than outright rejection. You are directly attacking someone's fundamental identity of themselves as a person, not their opinions or beliefs about a subject. Hopefully you can see a bit difference there. This is a subject I could go much more in depth into, but that would be better served through telegram rather than here on the RMB

How so? I mean, disliking one piece of your identity is better than disliking all pieces. If your entire identity is being LGBT, then you may want to consider getting a life outside of being gay, trans, bi, whatever you may be. Plus, you even saying that could be seen as an attack on my Christian beliefs, however, much like many people when the whole "hate the sin love the sinner" line comes out, we can usually get the idea that it isnt meant as an attack on you personally. And i mean, countries with the "hate the sin love the sinner" mentality tend to be a lot better places to live than countries with the "screw the gays" mentality, be you LGBT or not.
ye other than this most of the points are fair enough.

Quite surprising to find that the whole ul. Nowy Świat in Warsaw is decorated with Vatican flags today.

Must be some special occation.

viewtopic.php?p=42031152#p42031152

The Foreign Ministry responded to Chairman Pesin's letter with a very polite, "We hope he stays true to his word."

Holy Karenland wrote:How so? I mean, disliking one piece of your identity is better than disliking all pieces. If your entire identity is being LGBT, then you may want to consider getting a life outside of being gay, trans, bi, whatever you may be. Plus, you even saying that could be seen as an attack on my Christian beliefs, however, much like many people when the whole "hate the sin love the sinner" line comes out, we can usually get the idea that it isnt meant as an attack on you personally. And i mean, countries with the "hate the sin love the sinner" mentality tend to be a lot better places to live than countries with the "screw the gays" mentality, be you LGBT or not.
ye other than this most of the points are fair enough.

Do you find it socially and morally acceptable for someone to say "hate the religion but love the believer" ?
Disliking one piece of your identity is better than disliking all pieces. If your entire identity is being religious, then you may want to consider getting a life outside of being Christian or whatever you may be. Plus, you even saying that could be seen as an attack on my beliefs, however, much like many people when the whole "hate the religion love the believer" line comes out, we can usually get the idea that it isnt meant as an attack on you personally

---------------------

Perhaps some people who say that are pushing laws to restrict the ability to display religious symbols in public, maybe bans on books referencing characters who are religious. Maybe even punish teachers who talk about religion in the classroom or in any capacity to children. Religion isn't appropriate to talk about, it's too hard to understand for young children and they might decide they are Christian before they are even aware of the life-long consequences. But you have nothing to worry about and shouldn't feel attacked. They aren't targeting you after all, they're taking objection to particular acts in the name of common decency

Of course we're better off than in places like Iran and Afghanistan, for a multitude of reasons you may or may not want to accept. But that doesn't mean there's not a problem still

Shidei wrote:If your entire identity is being religious, then you may want to consider getting a life outside of being Christian or whatever you may be.

Well played, Shidei!

Ioudaia wrote:Well played, Shidei!

Quiet down, I'm working on cultivating an environment of calmness here. I'll send a link to my OF page or something if you wanna support me

Shidei wrote:I'm working on cultivating an environment of calmness here.

Yeah, I got that, and it's a well-written example for calmly helping people understand why what they're saying doesn't work.

Shidei wrote:
Do you find it socially and morally acceptable for someone to say "hate the religion but love the believer" ?
Disliking one piece of your identity is better than disliking all pieces. If your entire identity is being religious, then you may want to consider getting a life outside of being Christian or whatever you may be. Plus, you even saying that could be seen as an attack on my beliefs, however, much like many people when the whole "hate the religion love the believer" line comes out, we can usually get the idea that it isnt meant as an attack on you personally

---------------------

Perhaps some people who say that are pushing laws to restrict the ability to display religious symbols in public, maybe bans on books referencing characters who are religious. Maybe even punish teachers who talk about religion in the classroom or in any capacity to children. Religion isn't appropriate to talk about, it's too hard to understand for young children and they might decide they are Christian before they are even aware of the life-long consequences. But you have nothing to worry about and shouldn't feel attacked. They aren't targeting you after all, they're taking objection to particular acts in the name of common decency

Of course we're better off than in places like Iran and Afghanistan, for a multitude of reasons you may or may not want to accept. But that doesn't mean there's not a problem still

Depends on what the religion is pushing. I’m not gonna respect religions which tell people openly to genocide people of other religions, because yes, those do still exist nowadays.
And yea, you being able to switch up lgbt with Christian there was exactly my point. And in your third paragraph where you talk about children choosing to be Christian, can’t you say the same about teenagers/young adults learning about transgender and deciding they are that? And, if they got surgery, wouldn’t that arguably have more permanent lifelong consequences? The logic can be applied because the legal age is 16 top and 18 bottom, and the Prefrontal Cortex (part of brain for decision making) doesn’t fully develop until 25. I mean as a Christian, you can always convert to atheism if you so choose, but surgery is pretty much forever. And in some situations, that bar for Gender reassignment can be lowered to the age of 14. Isn’t that arguably worse, because unlike choosing to follow Jesus, it’s practically irreversible?

It'll be a while before I respond to that, but rest assured I'll get to it. Not doing it on mobile so I'll have to get back to PC

You don't seem like a particularly.... aggressively religious person so the similarities might be obvious to you, but there are a *lot* of people who push anti-LGBT sentiments who don't understand how easily these two identities can be interchangeable (even though one possesses an innate quality of choice that the other does not) and will get up in arms if you dare suggest some of the things they propose happen to others could happen to them instead

Holy Karenland wrote:How so? I mean, disliking one piece of your identity is better than disliking all pieces. If your entire identity is being LGBT, then you may want to consider getting a life outside of being gay, trans, bi, whatever you may be. Plus, you even saying that could be seen as an attack on my Christian beliefs, however, much like many people when the whole "hate the sin love the sinner" line comes out, we can usually get the idea that it isnt meant as an attack on you personally. And i mean, countries with the "hate the sin love the sinner" mentality tend to be a lot better places to live than countries with the "screw the gays" mentality, be you LGBT or not.
ye other than this most of the points are fair enough.

https://youtu.be/CkB9eTwLO1s?si=L9fLt9boNH81SnbK

jeez guys, i’m gonna run out of popcorn at this rate!

Yektov wrote:jeez guys, i’m gonna run out of popcorn at this rate!

Should try a more calorie-dense snack, like sticks of salted butter

Holy Karenland wrote:How so? I mean, disliking one piece of your identity is better than disliking all pieces. If your entire identity is being LGBT, then you may want to consider getting a life outside of being gay, trans, bi, whatever you may be. Plus, you even saying that could be seen as an attack on my Christian beliefs, however, much like many people when the whole "hate the sin love the sinner" line comes out, we can usually get the idea that it isnt meant as an attack on you personally. And i mean, countries with the "hate the sin love the sinner" mentality tend to be a lot better places to live than countries with the "screw the gays" mentality, be you LGBT or not.
ye other than this most of the points are fair enough.

Yeesh, even as a Catholic I hate the “Love the sinner, hate the sin” mentality. Religion is something that is personal and shouldn’t affect the person next to you in the slightest

Shidei wrote:Should try a more calorie-dense snack, like sticks of salted butter

https://youtu.be/pUn3gf-0VlY?si=OyMYt717_opBetOA

Got so many likes from a red and white flag with triangular design I thought AM was back

Shidei wrote:Got so many likes from a red and white flag with triangular design I thought AM was back

return of the king

«12. . .24,49824,49924,50024,50124,50224,50324,504. . .24,52224,523»

Advertisement