by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

The South Pacific WA Voting Center Board

Search

Search

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .45464748495051. . .7576»

NEW GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL DISCUSSION AND VOTE
---------------------------------------------------

Title: Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"
Author: Sylh Alanor (co-authored by Junitaki-cho)
Purpose: To repeal previous legislation, arguing loopholes arising from unclear language might be seriously exploitable by anti-union employers and countries, consequently harming the target's intent.

Sylh Alanor wrote:General Assembly Resolution #530 “Fairness in Collective Bargaining” (Category: Regulation; Area of Effect: Labour Rights) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The World Assembly,

Affirming that the protection of workers’ rights to unionise and collectively bargain is an admirable goal,

Understanding that some member nations may wish to balance unions’ rights with those of employers,

Concerned by the definition of ‘interference’ in clause 1, as it only prevents employers from attempting to gain control of labour unions and fails to provide any meaningful protections for the creation or operation of unions,

Noting that the term 'labour union' is not used consistently throughout the target, and that GAR#530 instead utilises various surrogate terms that unscrupulous employers and governments could effectively argue are different types of organisations, and that the protections over one type of organisation do not apply when their own organisation is considered to be another,

Disappointed by GAR#530's use of easily-exploitable language, which creates loopholes in the following sections:

  • 4c, which prohibits labour unions from ‘requiring excessive dues’ without defining what excessive would mean in this context, allowing anti-union governments to define any monetary amount or percentage of income as 'excessive',

  • 4d, which prohibits labour unions from influencing employers to pay for ‘unneeded workers’, stifling the efficacy of labour unions to intervene when employers seek to underpay or cut workers' hours, at will, any time an employer states the worker was 'unneeded',

Believing that GAR#530 does more through its language choices to harm the rights of workers than protect them,

Optimistic that a replacement proposal better suited to protecting labour unions and providing for fair negotiations will soon be passed,

Hereby repeals GAR#530, “Fairness in Collective Bargaining”.

View submitted proposal | View on-site drafting thread

---------------------------------------------------

Please discuss and vote on how regional nations and the Delegate should vote on this proposal.
Always remember to include the name of the resolution you are talking about in your posts to avoid confusion!

Click here to read voting instruction (Please do this if you have never voted before!)

Office of WA Legislation wrote:NEW GENERAL ASSEMBLY PROPOSAL DISCUSSION AND VOTE
---------------------------------------------------

Title: Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"
Author: Sylh Alanor (co-authored by Junitaki-cho)
Purpose: To repeal previous legislation, arguing loopholes arising from unclear language might be seriously exploitable by anti-union employers and countries, consequently harming the target's intent.

View submitted proposal | View on-site drafting thread

---------------------------------------------------

Please discuss and vote on how regional nations and the Delegate should vote on this proposal.
Always remember to include the name of the resolution you are talking about in your posts to avoid confusion!

Click here to read voting instruction (Please do this if you have never voted before!)

For

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

Against

Fairness in Collective Bargaining was and is a resolution I firmly believe in. Although I do agree that there are loopholes, there will always be loopholes in any resolution no matter who drafts it. I believe Fairness in Collective Bargaining is a strong resolution and should be kept.

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

The proposal raises some good points about the original resolution. As the author of Fairness in Collective Bargaining has voiced their support for this proposal and a replacement for the repeal target is nearing submission, I think it'd be safe to swap the target with a shiny new resolution that would fix the flaws pointed out in the proposal at hand.

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Condemn Lily

Against

They want an condemnation. Why give it to them? For raiding organisations, a condemnation from the Security Council is literally a badge of honour.

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Considering that the author of "Fairness in Collective Bargaining" supports the repeal based on the arguments presented in the proposed repeal, I believe that we should vote for the proposal knowing that another proposal exists to replace what will be repealed.

Condemn Lily

Against

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Condemn Lily

Against

Condemn Lily

Against

Vote for proposal Condemn Lily has been ended.

Result:
For: 2
Against: 11
Present: 1

OWL recommendation: Against

Link:

.

·

·
·

·


'Commend Ellenburg'
·
·
..
·

Background Information

Proposal title: 'Commend Ellenburg'
Author: Honeydewistania
Purpose: To honor Ellenburg's immense contributions, especially in region-building over extensive periods of time in a number of regions, notably the United Regions Alliance (URA), Conch Kingdom, and the Augustin Alliance as a whole, by awarding them a shiny badge of commendation.

Links


Vote .For.
·

The Office's Analysis

Referencing the many offices Ellenburg held in a multitude of regions over the many years of their NS existence, the at-vote resolution "Commend Ellenburg" clearly demonstrates why the nominee's achievements merit commendation. Both well-written and elaborate, it shows the incredible contributions they made to single regions like Autropolis and prominent interregional organizations like the URA or the Augustin Alliance, and accurately explains the significance of the nominee's involvement in the histories of those regions/organizations, making it a fit document for issuing the commendation of Ellenburg. Thus, OWL recommends a vote FOR the at-vote resolution, "Commend Ellenburg".

Supplementary Opinions
·
·
FOR | AGAINST
·

For

From TSP Citizens

Tepertopia is the Director of OWL and a Deputy Chair of the South Pacific.

Tepertopia wrote:The achievements of the nominee are really extensive and do seem to merit recognition by the Security Council. The proposal is well-written and elaborates on the actions of the nominee in nice detail, all in all making a very convincing case on why they should receive this commendation.

HumanSanity is a legislator and OWL staff member of the South Pacific.

HumanSanity wrote:Nominee has a huge swath of accomplishments and the resolution strikes a good balance between narrative and specific evidence. Being the primary builder behind the URA is no small feat.

From the World

Chimes is the Delegate of the Rejected Realms.

Chimes wrote:I'll admit I'm not overly familiar with the URA outside of a selected few regions, but what I have heard is positive.

Praeceps is the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the North Pacific.

Praeceps wrote:For. They've done well in helping smaller regions get together and collaborate.

Against

From TSP Citizens

At the time of writing, OWL had not found a solid opinion against the resolution from TSP citizens. You can make your own opinion heard by posting it on the Regional Message Board of the WA Voting Center!

From the World

At the time of writing, OWL had not found a solid opinion against the resolution from the rest of the world. You can make your own opinion heard by posting it on the Regional Message Board of the WA Voting Center!



·

WELCOME BEGINNER'S GUIDE WRITING GUIDE VOTING CENTER LinkDISCORD


·

·
LinkLink
·
·
Read dispatch

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

there are loopholes which this proposal points out and I believe warrants a repeal and the author of "Fairness in Collective Bargaining" supports the proposal. There is a new proposal to replace the repeal is currently underway and Knowing that their is a replacement proposal is not far away, it is in my humble opinion safe to vote "For" the repeal.

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

Repeal "Fairness in Collective Bargaining"

For

NEW SECURITY COUNCIL PROPOSAL DISCUSSION AND VOTE
---------------------------------------------------

Title: Repeal "Liberate The Embassy"
Author: Alcala-Cordel
Purpose: To repeal the previous liberation of The Embassy, as defender forces have successfully repelled the raiders and it would hinder natives from long-term securing the region themselves.

Alcala-Cordel wrote:Security Council Resolution #344 “Liberate The Embassy” shall be struck out and rendered null and void.

The Security Council,

  1. Understanding that The Embassy has been secured from hostile forces,

  2. Believing that this Council should allow the nation in the region the ability to establish barriers of entry to prevent future invasions,

  3. Acknowledging that The Embassy must reimpose said barriers so as to remain protected,

  4. Hereby Repeals SCR# 344 "Liberate The Embassy".

Co-authored by Balkede

View submitted proposal | View on-site drafting thread

---------------------------------------------------

Please discuss and vote on how regional nations and the Delegate should vote on this proposal.
Always remember to include the name of the resolution you are talking about in your posts to avoid confusion!

Click here to read voting instruction (Please do this if you have never voted before!)

Repeal "Liberate The Embassy"

For

Repeal "Liberate the Embassy"

For

Repeal "Liberate The Embassy"

For

Repeal "Liberate The Embassy"

For

A repeal is required to put a password back on The Embassy and make sure it's safe.

«12. . .45464748495051. . .7576»

Advertisement