by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .926927928929930931932. . .1,0101,011»

Post self-deleted by Bluraland.

Pillowlandia wrote:Thanks for the insightful commentary, I was truly bettered as a person by your striking analysis of a dead man's distaste for a distasteful man.

I'm always doing my part to bring light to those in the dark. However, our President is not distasteful. In fact, he is exactly what this nation needs to curb the politically correct thought police trying to stifle freedom, and in particular free speech in the United States.

I know this concept may be foreign to you, but there is always room for improvement.

Zhesovand wrote:What does this has to do with TDC?

Keeping the region active.

Leikistan wrote:Is this region still active?

Maybe.

Bluraland wrote:Apparently not

?

Principal of the thing

Hello

Zhesovand

Principal of the thing wrote:Hello

Welcome to The Democratic Commonwealth.

New Poll! We're back baby!

Principal of the thing wrote:Hello

Hi there.

Today I am honoring the memories of those that rushed in while others ran out. Never forget.

The Ambassador to the CLFR wrote: However, our President is not distasteful. In fact, he is exactly what this nation needs to curb the politically correct thought police trying to stifle freedom, and in particular free speech in the United States.

I know this concept may be foreign to you, but there is always room for improvement.

He speaks like the village idiot, lacks even basic knowledge of statecraft, and speaks with like a poorly educated middle school student. He is only in office because he was not his opponent, and that he is an """""""""""outsider""""""""""" of the establishment, not out of any real individual merit.

The Ambassador to the CLFR wrote:Today I am honoring the memories of those that rushed in while others ran out. Never forget.

The meaning behind this is clear, but the phrasing feels poor - especially once one factors in your previous political statements.

New Poll!

Pillowlandia wrote:The meaning behind this is clear, but the phrasing feels poor - especially once one factors in your previous political statements.

If you took off those Left colored glasses you might be able to get a clue about the real world.

The city on a hill

Pillowlandia wrote:He speaks like the village idiot, lacks even basic knowledge of statecraft, and speaks with like a poorly educated middle school student. He is only in office because he was not his opponent, and that he is an """""""""""outsider""""""""""" of the establishment, not out of any real individual merit.

What a dumb liberal. As Satan was the original radical liberal, I am confident of conservatism being just. So far in his presidency Trump has accomplished more than any President since Reagan. A supreme court justice appointed (soon to be two once the liberals learn what shutting up is), the domestic economy is the best it's been in ages, the tariffs are helping to preserve the balance of power with China and protecting American hegemony, America's treaties and financial deals are being renegotiated for the benefit of the United States, useless regulations have been cut, some progress is finally being made with North Korea, spending for the military has been thankfully increased, and most importantly, as the one (soon to be two) supreme court justices actually care about the law and the Constitution (unlike Ginsberg and her cronies), some genuine restrictions can finally be place on the murdering of babies. As for his speech, Trump remains the best middle finger to political correctness, the latest tool in the new left's (which is, at its core, the same it has always been since the French Revolution) pocket, and he has reintroduced God into speeches, which, no pun intended, thank God for.

Principal of the thing

No running in the halls

Principal of the thing wrote:No running in the halls

Give me your lunch money...

Principal of the thing

Post self-deleted by Bluraland.

Bluraland wrote:Did you just accuse pillow of being left?!? XD

Why, yes. But there is more than enough evidence to make it more of a statement of fact than an accusation.

How about that new low in DC politics? Any thoughts on the Ford/Kavanaugh situation?

The Ambassador to the CLFR wrote:If you took off those Left colored glasses you might be able to get a clue about the real world.

Left is not a colour.

Let's break this down into two components. 1) you either unironically believe this word vomit and I am sympathetic to your poor life choices or are entirely ironic. Whilst I'd prefer the latter, the former feels more likely.

2)

The city on a hill wrote:What a dumb liberal. As Satan was the original radical liberal, I am confident of conservatism being just.


I have no actual response to this besides laughing; applying distinctly modern political labels to religion is both in poor taste and probably among the worst possible readings you could preform of the bible and other related texts.

The city on a hill wrote:So far in his presidency Trump has accomplished more than any President since Reagan.

You insult the legacy of Reagan.

The city on a hill wrote:A supreme court justice appointed (soon to be two once the liberals learn what shutting up is)

This is not a true accomplishment. The same logic used by congressional Republicans to deny a hearing on the Obama administration nomination, no matter your opinion of the nominee himself, not even entering the picture when a seat became open during an election year displays their utterly partisan efforts and actions.

For recollection, if you have forgotten, Republican leadership denied the hearing on the basis of it being an election year and thus the hearing ought to occur after the election to ensure the people's voice is heard in 2016. If you care for a source, google it, they're not hard to come by.

The city on a hill wrote:the domestic economy is the best it's been in ages

The labor market is very tight, yes, but wage growth remains anemic, and a disproportionate portion of the economic 'growth' has been tied to the stock market (made all the worse by the fact that a majority of Americans have little to no stock holdings). Further, economics and politics are generally speaking loosely related and the actual impacts of various policies are mostly vaguely understood even by the most qualified of economists.

The city on a hill wrote:the tariffs are helping to preserve the balance of power with China and protecting American hegemony

The American century is over and the American age has begun to see the beginnings of a sunset. Speaking strictly of the balance of power, the United States holds a qualitative advantage over anything the PLA has, and from my understanding, the PLA is at approximately where the US was in the mid-80s currently. The problem here lies in the fact that Chinese military power is focused wholly in Asia, the US has its attention spread over a great deal more territory. The rate of Chinese development in technology and defense is multiple times faster than that of America both because the technology they are developing is playing catch up and has real life examples already but also because they are operating on all cylinders while the US struggles to do the same.

Speaking of tariffs, they have historically proven to be ineffective and hold little benefit to the United States. Their viability as negotiation tactics are questionable, but, unlike their efficacy, potentially could be done effectively. By and large, selective tariffs to bring pain to specific sectors of the chinese economy are not the worst play but are hardly the best.

The city on a hill wrote:America's treaties and financial deals are being renegotiated for the benefit of the United States[/qupte]
Financial deals? Meaning unclear, going to move on.

Trade deals, however, are a point of debate. The real purpose of recent trade deal efforts such as the TPP are on one hand meant to promote trade but further to build out further the economic orbit of other states to the US both to make the deal better to align with the US and her interests and to make aligning with non-american interests as having additional costs.

[quote=the_city_on_a_hill;32519738]useless regulations have been cut

'useless' requires further definition and contextualization to actually be debated in any meaningful way.

The city on a hill wrote:some progress is finally being made with North Korea

the only progress which has been reached is SK-NK talks, US-NK relations remain fragile at best and the dynamic of China being the true player behind the scenes (given that the NK economy lives and dies by chinese choices) remains.

The city on a hill wrote:spending for the military has been thankfully increased

I actually agree, however greater efficiency in expenditures must be sought out to get better bang for the taxpayers dollar. Esspecially since there are fewer of those being collected following the great effort to reduce the american tax burden.

The city on a hill wrote:as the one (soon to be two) supreme court justices actually care about the law and the Constitution (unlike Ginsberg and her cronies), some genuine restrictions can finally be place on the murdering of babies.

'genuine' restrictions. Without launching into the great American culture war, the fact that the US is deeply split on the issue and that wishing for the court to make it so that there are restrictions on abortion is a decidedly un-democratic and anti-american point of view.

Why not seek to instead make legislative progress upon the issue instead of the unelected body of the supreme court?
Further, calling any member of the supreme court a 'cronie' does a great disservice to their career, but also the senate who are the ones who ultimately put them there. Not to mention, I sincearly doubt any justice has ever woken up and thought "I'm going to ruin the republican's lives!" before laughing evilly. Could be wrong on that last point though, don't follow the morning routines of them.

The city on a hill wrote:As for his speech, Trump remains the best middle finger to political correctness, the latest tool in the new left's (which is, at its core, the same it has always been since the French Revolution) pocket, and he has reintroduced God into speeches, which, no pun intended, thank God for.

Despite the poor phrasing of your thanking god, there is nothing important or noteworthy of him referencing god. It's a safer assumption to think that he is using it as a dog whistle to get the evangelical group than to think him a good Christian. Trump is more of a middle finger to decency and a coal in the fire of unproductive partisian efforts.

The city on a hill wrote:What a dumb liberal. As Satan was the original radical liberal, I am confident of conservatism being just. So far in his presidency Trump has accomplished more than any President since Reagan. A supreme court justice appointed (soon to be two once the liberals learn what shutting up is), the domestic economy is the best it's been in ages, the tariffs are helping to preserve the balance of power with China and protecting American hegemony, America's treaties and financial deals are being renegotiated for the benefit of the United States, useless regulations have been cut, some progress is finally being made with North Korea, spending for the military has been thankfully increased, and most importantly, as the one (soon to be two) supreme court justices actually care about the law and the Constitution (unlike Ginsberg and her cronies), some genuine restrictions can finally be place on the murdering of babies. As for his speech, Trump remains the best middle finger to political correctness, the latest tool in the new left's (which is, at its core, the same it has always been since the French Revolution) pocket, and he has reintroduced God into speeches, which, no pun intended, thank God for.

Bro, not even I would defend tariffs

Pillowlandia

Post self-deleted by Vajrayanah.

New velonia wrote:Bro, not even I would defend tariffs

Yes, because that's the only problem with that word vomit.

Pillowlandia wrote:Let's break this down into two components. 1) you either unironically believe this word vomit and I am sympathetic to your poor life choices or are entirely ironic. Whilst I'd prefer the latter, the former feels more likely.

Yup, still a clueless lefty.

Hello TDC, What's up my dudes

The Ambassador to the CLFR wrote:Yup, still a clueless lefty.

Your failure to both define the bounds of being a ‘lefty’ and to actually respond to the, approaching, serious section continue to amount to painting an image of you pouring a bucket of paint over your head and sticking your thumbs in your ears.

«12. . .926927928929930931932. . .1,0101,011»

Advertisement