by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .92939495969798. . .106107»

New chierialman wrote:Good morning, comrades. You can tell how to manage the state and interact with others. I don't quite understand how to play it.

It's mostly about responding to issues to adapt your nation, and then interacting with your community and the World Assembly, or role playing in forums.

Lennonia, Alcala-Cordel, and New chierialman

New chierialman

Thanks, comrades. I appreciate your answers. They helped me a lot.

New chierialman

Good afternoon, comrades. I would like to discuss a resolution on the control of animal diseases. I look at the results of the vote and even with great effort I can not understand how and why other nations vote against the adoption of the law. Even when viewed from other sides, no one has any reason to reject it. If a dictatorship votes, then it doesn't care about freedom, but there will be a healthier population to work with. On the part of liberal countries, this is also beneficial, as it will improve the health of the nation. Only some dead ancaps can vote against. Or am I wrong?

Lennonia, Alcala-Cordel, and Belgizka

New chierialman wrote:Good afternoon, comrades. I would like to discuss a resolution on the control of animal diseases. I look at the results of the vote and even with great effort I can not understand how and why other nations vote against the adoption of the law. Even when viewed from other sides, no one has any reason to reject it. If a dictatorship votes, then it doesn't care about freedom, but there will be a healthier population to work with. On the part of liberal countries, this is also beneficial, as it will improve the health of the nation. Only some dead ancaps can vote against. Or am I wrong?

roleplay ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

of what? no idea

Well Niveusium it looks like I accidentally couped you again

« Accidentally coup » XD

that's the thing you focus on? not the "again"? lol

Again, well comrade, you were delegate in the past for only a day so …

Belgizka

I can’t help but notice the quite low support for our regional leader, like for 52 members only max 7 endorsements… Is there a lack of popular participation in here ?

Lennonia wrote:Well Niveusium it looks like I accidentally couped you again

Ah how unfortunate LOL

Belgizka wrote:I can’t help but notice the quite low support for our regional leader, like for 52 members only max 7 endorsements… Is there a lack of popular participation in here ?

people aren't active here and tend to come and go pretty often, which is quite unfortunate. Some states leave, and some states just expire.

Niveusium wrote:people aren't active here and tend to come and go pretty often, which is quite unfortunate. Some states leave, and some states just expire.

Ah ok, i'm quite new around here by the way.

I think we should oppose the last WA resolution about punishment : how are we suppose to fight bourgeoisie and capitalism if we can't condemn the whole social class ?

Buy consider the following: war crimes

But*

Belgizka wrote:I think we should oppose the last WA resolution about punishment : how are we suppose to fight bourgeoisie and capitalism if we can't condemn the whole social class ?

Also the 3rd point allows for that

Lennonia wrote:Also the 3rd point allows for that

not explicitly, like individual crime, not class struggle one

Lennonia wrote:Buy consider the following: war crimes

What are you talking about ? In our socialists states there are no war crime or crime against humanity, only, let's say, "mass incident".

Belgizka wrote:What are you talking about ? In our socialists states there are no war crime or crime against humanity, only, let's say, "mass incident".

Yeah socialist ones, I don't want the other guy to do them.

I’m worried, as a worker’s state, encircled by capitalist and monarchist one, to give away any possible means of fight, which include collective punishment.
As long as it is democratically choose by the people of each socialist nation individually I don’t see a problem.

I just made it so that sex ed is more comprehensive to prevent incel mass shooters and my agricultural production went down

what

Lennonia, Alcala-Cordel, Seyitgazi, and Belgizka

kinda make sense I guess ?

I mean if you give sex ed to farmer there is less chance they impregnate half of their family so smaller peasant class wich mean less agricultural production

Grand Radia wrote:I just made it so that sex ed is more comprehensive to prevent incel mass shooters and my agricultural production went down

what

lmao

Belgizka wrote:kinda make sense I guess ?

I mean if you give sex ed to farmer there is less chance they impregnate half of their family so smaller peasant class wich mean less agricultural production

quite the dangerous stereotype for an entire class, comrade.
But yeah depends on how much grand radia's production went down, even if it's a small chunk of that demographic it could be plausible, accidentally dialectical-materialist nationsates?lol

«12. . .92939495969798. . .106107»

Advertisement