«12. . .8,1038,1048,1058,1068,1078,1088,109. . .9,1659,166»
Biology? Yes, and what are you referring to? Preservation of ecosystems or something?
If you want to bring up Sweden's presumed violence problems, I can always point to "gun problems" in the US and ask how you have any grounds to talk of Sweden as if it were some terrible place. But just like you'd say that the situation is not that bad in the US, I'd say that Sweden is still one of the safer places on Earth.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/swedens-rape-crisis-isnt-what-it-seems/article30019623/
Libertarianism was originally left-wing (from the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century) and an euphemism for anarchism, right-wing people just started appropriating the term later on.
That's hardly a "libertarian hang out". Maybe go to reddit.com/r/libertarian or something. Or http://libertarianism.org/. Or http://libcom.org/.
Why would I do that? After all, you are the expert on using Wikipedia.
Also, I did your stupid /pol/ thing. I got one guy who complimented me on my dubs and informed me that libertarianism and Communism were inherently opposed based upon the grounds of how Communism is implemented in practice, rather than in theory, and one guy who called me a Commie Jew. And then the thread died because nobody cared.
So that's exactly zero objections.
Link?
Yes. Generally, it's things like "Don't call people names" and the tenets set forth by Glorious Admin (page=faq#etiquette)
Jute and The northern cresent
Yes, yes, I am sure. You're convinced by an anarcho-Communist symbol, but yet can't be bothered to lube up your think pan to get those gears going.
I do hope Admin's glory and existence are never questioned again:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/156201784598069248/294603276597329921/unknown.png
The northern cresent, Alhurriat Walssalam, and The anglo-japan union
"yet it should be obvious that any free and libertarian society"
That is more convincing the Libertarainism>Anarchism>Anracho-Communsim
An actual quote from a AnCom about libertarianism should be more convincing then ^
Would you bother linking to the page with that quote? Because, out of context, it says nothing about anything to do with anarcho-Communism.
Also, yes, yes, we get it. You think simple logic is unconvincing, and do not find it to be logical.
Friend,
Lucky for you, Admin has already provided a way to question their supremacy and judgement.
http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1490307665521.png
You are dumb is much simpler
Hmm, let me see...
Oh, here's something that vaguely resembles it. "Yet it should be obvious that no (not any) free and libertarian society could make use of money."
Is that what you meant? Because that is the only thing in that image with any semblance to it.
But, hey, keep talking. I've got nothing better to do, everyone else is getting a laugh... Really, you're the only one who this is having any bad effect on.
«12. . .8,1038,1048,1058,1068,1078,1088,109. . .9,1659,166»
Advertisement