by Max Barry

Latest Forum Topics

Advertisement

Search

Search

Sorry! Search is currently disabled. Returning soon.

[+] Advanced...

Author:

Region:

Sort:

«12. . .8,1038,1048,1058,1068,1078,1088,109. . .9,1659,166»

The anglo-japan union wrote:/pol/ is one person meme just won't end will it

Eh, most people there share the same edgy views so you might as well call it a "one person with bipolar".

The northern cresent

Amatsumagatschi

Riveti wrote:Because 4chan is more reliable than simple logic.
Mkay

The lie detector says otherwise, my friend.

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union

Scepez wrote:Eh, most people there share the same edgy views so you might as well call it a "one person with bipolar".

Ive never been there for more than a hour the post

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union wrote:Yes
You had a biology course right?
I'm completely sure about that..................*Sounds of a grenade exploding*
I went for the low hanging fruit because my will to argue is equivalent to how much I consider the MSM credible

Biology? Yes, and what are you referring to? Preservation of ecosystems or something?

If you want to bring up Sweden's presumed violence problems, I can always point to "gun problems" in the US and ask how you have any grounds to talk of Sweden as if it were some terrible place. But just like you'd say that the situation is not that bad in the US, I'd say that Sweden is still one of the safer places on Earth.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/swedens-rape-crisis-isnt-what-it-seems/article30019623/

The anglo-japan union wrote:That anarchism isn't inherently libertarian and that like any libertarian would tell you Anarcho-Communsim is not libertarian

Libertarianism was originally left-wing (from the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century) and an euphemism for anarchism, right-wing people just started appropriating the term later on.

The anglo-japan union wrote:Just wanted to point him to the direction of a libertarian hangout that doesn't require signing up. The same could be done by going to a libertarian event and asking the same question

That's hardly a "libertarian hang out". Maybe go to reddit.com/r/libertarian or something. Or http://libertarianism.org/. Or http://libcom.org/.

I would like to remind everyone, again, that his first big argument against this idea was because Wikipedia didn't bother listing it in the table of libertarian ideologies.

We are dealing with a true master here.

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union

Jute wrote:Biology? Yes, and what are you referring to? Preservation of ecosystems or something?
If you want to bring up Sweden's presumed violence problems, I can always point to "gun problems" in the US and ask how you have any grounds to talk of Sweden as if it were some terrible place. But just like you'd say that the situation is not that bad in the US, I'd say that Sweden is still one of the safer places on Earth.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/swedens-rape-crisis-isnt-what-it-seems/article30019623/ Libertarianism was originally left-wing (from the 19th century to the first half of the 20th century) and an euphemism for anarchism, right-wing people just started appropriating the term later on.That's hardly a "libertarian hang out". Maybe go to reddit.com/r/libertarian or something. Or http://libertarianism.org/. Or http://libcom.org/.

Overfishing and the protection of endangered species. One could also count the food industry as whole if one really wanted to.

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union

Niios wrote:I would like to remind everyone, again, that his first big argument against this idea was because Wikipedia didn't bother listing it in the table of libertarian ideologies.
We are dealing with a true master here.

Just call me an idiot it's much faster

Deathfall and The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union wrote:Just call me an idiot it's much faster

Why would I do that? After all, you are the expert on using Wikipedia.

Also, I did your stupid /pol/ thing. I got one guy who complimented me on my dubs and informed me that libertarianism and Communism were inherently opposed based upon the grounds of how Communism is implemented in practice, rather than in theory, and one guy who called me a Commie Jew. And then the thread died because nobody cared.

So that's exactly zero objections.

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union

Niios wrote:Why would I do that? After all, you are the expert on using Wikipedia.
Also, I did your stupid /pol/ thing. I got one guy who complimented me on my dubs and informed me that libertarianism and Communism were inherently opposed based upon the grounds of how Communism is implemented in practice, rather than in theory, and one guy who called me a Commie Jew. And then the thread died because nobody cared.
So that's exactly zero objections.

Link?

The anglo-japan union wrote:Link?

It got pruned, genius, the link won't do jack.

http://i.imgur.com/6FbNc19.png

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union wrote:Just call me an idiot it's much faster

It's also against the rules, and I'm sure Niios is aware of that, so that's probably a reason.

The northern cresent

Shizensky wrote:It's also against the rules, and I'm sure Niios is aware of that

wait we have rules

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union

Niios wrote:It got pruned, genius, the link won't do jack.
http://i.imgur.com/6FbNc19.png

It gets archived
Also that second poster did more to convince me of what you said than you ever did

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union wrote:Also that second poster did more to convince me of what you said than you ever did

So... me being called a Commie Jew is more convincing support for anarcho-Communism being libertarian than accurate and valid logic?

And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.

Niios wrote:wait we have rules

Yes. Generally, it's things like "Don't call people names" and the tenets set forth by Glorious Admin (page=faq#etiquette)

Jute and The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union

Niios wrote:So... me being called a Commie Jew is more convincing support for anarcho-Communism being libertarian than accurate and valid logic?
And you wonder why nobody takes you seriously.

I found your thread
The picture included is more convincing

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union wrote:I found your thread
The picture included is more convincing

Yes, yes, I am sure. You're convinced by an anarcho-Communist symbol, but yet can't be bothered to lube up your think pan to get those gears going.

I do hope Admin's glory and existence are never questioned again:

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/156201784598069248/294603276597329921/unknown.png

The northern cresent, Alhurriat Walssalam, and The anglo-japan union

The anglo-japan union

Niios wrote:Yes, yes, I am sure. You're convinced by an anarcho-Communist symbol, but yet can't be bothered to lube up your think pan to get those gears going.

"yet it should be obvious that any free and libertarian society"
That is more convincing the Libertarainism>Anarchism>Anracho-Communsim
An actual quote from a AnCom about libertarianism should be more convincing then ^

Shizensky wrote:I do hope Admin's glory and existence are never questioned again:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/156201784598069248/294603276597329921/unknown.png

*Questions it so hard*

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union wrote:"yet it should be obvious that any free and libertarian society"
That is more convincing the Libertarainism>Anarchism>Anracho-Communsim
An actual quote from a AnCom about libertarianism should be more convincing then ^

Would you bother linking to the page with that quote? Because, out of context, it says nothing about anything to do with anarcho-Communism.

Also, yes, yes, we get it. You think simple logic is unconvincing, and do not find it to be logical.

Riveti wrote:*Questions it so hard*

Friend,

Lucky for you, Admin has already provided a way to question their supremacy and judgement.

viewtopic.php?p=16394954#appeals

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union

Niios wrote:Would you bother linking to the page with that quote? Because, out of context, it says nothing about anything to do with anarcho-Communism.
Also, yes, yes, we get it. You think simple logic is unconvincing, and do not find it to be logical.

http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1490307665521.png
You are dumb is much simpler

The anglo-japan union wrote:http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1490307665521.png
You are dumb is much simpler

Please stop trying to convince people to flame you.

The northern cresent

The anglo-japan union wrote:http://i.4cdn.org/pol/1490307665521.png
You are dumb is much simpler

Hmm, let me see...

Oh, here's something that vaguely resembles it. "Yet it should be obvious that no (not any) free and libertarian society could make use of money."

Is that what you meant? Because that is the only thing in that image with any semblance to it.

But, hey, keep talking. I've got nothing better to do, everyone else is getting a laugh... Really, you're the only one who this is having any bad effect on.

«12. . .8,1038,1048,1058,1068,1078,1088,109. . .9,1659,166»

Advertisement