I don't expect a 2016 resolution to hold to our 2021 standards :P Although yes, I do agree with you that it's poorly written, doesn't contain much substance and should be replaced by superior legislation, especially when it's such a consequential matter to legislate something on.
While I'm not exactly well-versed on the rules and regulations GA proposals have to undergo, I believe that falls foul of the duplication rule, which states that;
From the verb 'to duplicate' - to repeat a specific action or concept. Proposals may elaborate in specific areas of policy where broad legislation exists, but may not replicate specific policy. Authors may re-iterate in general terms a minor part of existing policy to provide support to their proposal.
This reminds me of when my classmates were working on a parade float that had fruit as part of it, and the adults referred to the people dealing with that part of the float as "fruity people".
As a fruity person I'm unhappy that they stole my title
As aephony being fellow potatoists.. We're offended by:
If I had a strong army like: Moulk2, I would have attacked. Sentences like these can lead into trouble.
I break ties with ANY nation that insults potatoism like that;
And has the urge to even let that come out of their pen/keyboard/mouth.
aephony requests an apology.
And also... tangerines are banned.