New Western EmpireBoard

Secular Soverign Republics wrote:

Yes you stole it from us. That's why it's in line with you. It was recommended by Trist,see in the passed bills sections.

It’s got nothing to do with your one. Don’t you dare say it’s stolen when you have not even seen it yet. SMH.

Corsoaua wrote:

It’s got nothing to do with your one. Don’t you dare say it’s stolen when you have not even seen it yet. SMH.

See the passed bills and see the senators who proposed it, know the fact then speak.

United soviet states of russian empire wrote:

Well done, and that took how many months to be passed again?

And who was controlling the senate, who was the chancellor and the deputy chancellor?

Secular Soverign Republics wrote:

See the passed bills and see the senators who proposed it, know the fact then speak.

I’m not talking about passed bills am I? I literally said in the works. Please read before saying anything.

Secular Soverign Republics wrote:

Previous chancellors you say, all the CTZ hoodlums, this is the reason i say CTZ is a corrupt party saying big dialogues, but no work. All corrupt.

Your definition of corruption is very twisted

Slovaria wrote:

Your definition of corruption is very twisted

Cause you don't want to see the truth and pretend it's in a twisted format.

Secular Soverign Republics wrote:

And who was controlling the senate, who was the chancellor and the deputy chancellor?

The Senate was controlled by the Majority Coalition which didn't do too much. The Chancellor was an Independent because they aspired for such a role and have been in the community for a long time, the Deputy Chancellor was a party member which was apart of the Majority Coalition. If I know how coalitions work, all parties involved get a say in who is sponsored for Chancellor. Kinda strange that UPA agreed to let Bacon who is an Independent be Chancellor and then let Benn being Deputy Chancellor even though the goal was to show that the new election system increases smaller parties ability to run and win.

Slovaria wrote:

It was our bill, a bill you strongly supported, by the way, you just contradicted yourself, first you say the GR was RIP's doing and now you're giving us the credit?

I was pointing out how you purged useless bills which I strongly support, then nearly instantly proposed a useless bill and passed it. Your policy doesn't exist and you just do whatever gets you the most support based off of that.

As you can see, the murder show going on between CTZ and UPA only proves my point that both parties only care about power. They've exposed their weaknesses and it's quite sad seeing the sides go at each other over who is more corrupt or who contributed the most to the most useless bills in the Senate. There are other alternatives to this nonsense. For example, for the past three months, RDU and RIP have been in a Senate coalition. Now with this coalition, we had the minority and were able to control the Senate with 3 Senators despite the CTZ-UPA majority coalition. In the minority coalition, it took us three months to make sensible constitutional reformatting while CTZ and UPA took nearly a year.

We need solutions, not political theater. Both CTZ and UPA are all talk and no action. Is the best argument from them really "proven to be essential for the functioning of the region"? Well, based on recent actions in government that doesn't seem to be the case. Because if you can't make sensible change while in a coalition with the other big party, your parties are proven to be nonessential for the functioning of the region. If you want change, Citizens' and the United Progressives will not deliver it. If you want your voice to be heard, vote for a different party other than the Owl and the Dove. Instead, vote for the Lion, the RDU and put an obstacle in front of the popularity contest that CTZ and UPA are in.

Slovaria wrote:

May I ask what bill you're referring to?

Starboard Act

United soviet states of russian empire wrote:

The Senate was controlled by the Majority Coalition which didn't do too much. The Chancellor was an Independent because they aspired for such a role and have been in the community for a long time, the Deputy Chancellor was a party member which was apart of the Majority Coalition. If I know how coalitions work, all parties involved get a say in who is sponsored for Chancellor. Kinda strange that UPA agreed to let Bacon who is an Independent be Chancellor and then let Benn being Deputy Chancellor even though the goal was to show that the new election system increases smaller parties ability to run and win.

And who proposed Bac and Benn not us. Bac was selected cause he was indepedent and won't side with majority but this backfired when he resigned. Benn,a CTZ loyalist took over and this whole process took more than a month.So this can't be our fault. Think before you speak.

This is the most active the RMB has been in a long time