Islam, as a religion, is one of the biggest factor that disturbs the political interests of the Republiken movement. There is nothing more efficient to terrorize an angry populace into submission than a somekind of Allah that monitors your thoughts 24/7 and threatens to eternally torture those who challenged his supposedly perfect sharia system, with unparalleled brutal sadism. This Sky Dictatorship system has been the narrative of the Khilafah for the last three decades, and had been an irritating obstacle in the nationalists' efforts to increase their political power. But in recent times, this notion is being stripped naked and challenged by an unholy alliance of partners-in-"crime": the atheists, who advocated total demystification of Islam, and the moderates, who focuses on getting rid of bad laws. This cooperation, coordinated by the Young Foxes think-thank, is referred to as the Divine Orchestra.

Cooperation between the two groups are organized by a secret society called the Young Foxes. It took form of a "hammer and anvil" strategy, taking advantage of the thick atmosphere of pro-Islam political correctness that dictates political debates.

There are three aims of this alliance:

1. To get rid of Islamist Salafism's kegilaan nasional (national insanity) and all of its vicious elements from Dwipantara.

2. To establish a secular state where all citizen are equal, free to live, to pursue happiness, and to practice their belief (or lack thereof).

3. To increase the numbers of atheists and moderates within the people. Irreligiousity is targeted to spread to ~20% of citizens and the moderates 45%, meaning that combined with non-Muslims (~10%), pro-Republikens will control three quarters of the national population.

Of course, selfish interests are involved. The atheists also have another goal, which follows the ancient strategy of divide and conquer: create a large and bitter schism between fanatical and moderate Muslims. The moderates meanwhile wanted to paint the atheists as a disease symptom that appears due to the Khilafah's extremism, and by eliminating the source of problem – Salafist Islamism – the number of atheists will also drop. This not an uncommon knowledge, a reason why the Young Foxes network has been very important.

1. Atheists: Hammer
TL;DR, demonstrate that irreligiousness posesses both clear scientific and moral superiority compared to the primitive Islam.

---

After the Khilafah's takeover in the late '60s, atheism began to really expand as a serious topic in public discourse, as many started to view Islam not as a mere tool used by problematic dictator-wannabes, but the actual source of problems itself. Especially with Salafist Islam, characterized by its obedience not only to Allah and His prophet, but also the first three generations of Islam – a goldmine for backwards and offensively bigoted ideas only comparable to the Apartheid and the Jim Crow states.

Role

As a "hammer", atheists took the job of criticizing Islam directly, without being held back by political correctness or social norms. This is not easy. Children have been indoctrinated since childhood that apostates, especially those who challenge Islam, is the worst of the worst of creatures – far worse than rats and cholera. Not only is it perfectly fine to kill apostates, it is also a desirable. Atheists therefore have to be very careful in travelling the deadly marshes of the Khilafah, carrying the torch of truth while avoiding the watchful eyes of the deadly ogres that will kill you when they saw your true form: your parents and your friends.

Coming out

Despite the dangers, however, the Young Foxes strongly, strongly suggest to all atheist to come out sooner or later. The reason? After studying the struggle of LGBT activists in western countries, it is now known that people are much more tolerant to one group if they have a friend or family member that belongs to that particular group. Meaning, if more and more people know an atheist or apostate, more people will be tolerant to this group – a necessary step in the advancement of the atheist's quality of life, since at the present time, the death penalty looms over the back of each and every apostate, both open or hiding. Therefore, for the greater good thst is the advancement of atheists as a group and Dwipantara as a nation, atheist should start communicating their beliefs to their aquaintences.

However, without actual numbers, it will be hard for atheists to propose and pass reforms that will kill the artificial system of systematic persecution and criminalization of apostates currently implemented by the ruling regime. So outside of coming out, atheists are also strongly encouraged to share their views to the world, and try to convert as many people as they can from pious Muslims to become, if not an atheist, then at least a tolerant and open-minded moderate Muslim.

TL;DR, to secure a nation safe for atheists to live, atheists must go on the offensive.

Strategy

First and foremost, the most obvious concern of fellow atheists are the life of its brothers. With death sentence hanging above their head every day, the Young Foxes and its associates worked hard to ensure the safety of its members. They operate secret networks to sell and distribute banned literatures – a stable source of income, as this includes the highly popular illegal western and Japanese music and movie CDs – and rescue teams to help fellow atheists who are in danger of being exposed of even murdered by their family and friends.

Secret trainings on how to spread the truth without getting yourself killed is also conducted, either through the new internet or through clandestine meetings operated by independent disconnected cells (so if one is uncovered, it does not spread to the other cells). Many young free thinkers volunteered on programs to help the poor and the left behind, as teachers or social workers. While in mission, they then try to seed doubt in the populace disillusioned by the Khilafah, while sowing sympathy with the atheist movement and teach the value of doublechecking, scepticism, and open-mindedness. The other and arguably more important battleground is school and campuses, where information is more easily passed around and discussed.

Braver atheists go down directly to the streets, however. The most well-known speaker, a masked public figure calling himself "the Fox", have even made it to regional television due to his respectful, polite, and humorous upbringing – far from the holocaustic tirades commonly shouted by angry ulemas. Campus meetings are also known as a hotbed for vocals, while vandalism are a common method to show to a neighborhood, "atheist was here". This acts is especially important, as the irreligious network need to build up a persona of unstoppable snowball that lurks from every crevices, which serves three purpose: to inflate the perceived number of atheists, still a long way from the targeted population of 20%, to increase confidence within members, and as a part of its secret deal with the moderates to balloon atheism's supposed existential threat to Islam, enabling the moderates to pass necessary reforms.

A common way for atheists to sow doubt is to fake an innocent curiousity, and get to the target not as a know-it-all jerk whose diktats have to be heed to, but an ignorant newbie seeking to ask someone with more knowledge. Then, atheists have to listen to the person's arguments with actual respect, and encourage discussion instead of shouting matches. When things go south, atheists can always hide behind the shield of "curiousity", as Muslims will naturally want to help its brother to find a way to the truth.

Methods

In general, atheists dissect Islam by pressing on irreligiousness' two most important high ground:

1. Scientific superiority

2. Moral superiority

Campaign usually took place between closest friends and family, after their "open-mindedness" are checked through the various methods developed by the Young Foxes – those who are too radical are too dangerous to be approached, and therefore should be left behind until the situation are favorable. Small talks will be conducted that will eventually lead to the questions, "why do you believe in God" and "why do you believe in Allah specifically." Common answers include the Quran's supposed scientific miracles and the good deeds of Muhammad.

One of the supposed miracles that is most widely quoted is the cocoklogi (forced fitting-ism) of numbers: set the Quran in specific ways, and you will get a set of angka cantik (pretty numbers). However, atheists shouldn't busy themselves in debunking the various pseudoscientific cocoklogis – by definition, is undebunkable – and instead advised to just tell about a surah within the Quran and point out is mathematical miracle-not.

Elementary, my dear Allah

Inheritance is a serious issue that have spilled countless blood, torn families apart with hate, and destroyed empires. With that in mind, you would have expected Islam to design the single best system of inheritance available in the entire spacetime. However, let's pass over the horridly sexist regulation that ignorantly generalized all men and women with vastly different income statuses into two dichotomical group, and instead focus on the problem that arise when a specific and not uncommon case occurs.

Suppose that John have a wife, daughters, a father, a mother, and some wealth. When he died, according to Quran 4:11-12, his wealth will be divided between his family in these particular fractions:

• Wife: 1/8 = 3/24,

• Daughters: 2/3 = 16/24,

• Father: 1/6 = 4/24,

• Mother: 1/6 = 4/24,

• Total = 27/24=1.125

The total is more than 1, a grave arithmetical mistake. This elementary school-level error cannot be reconciled in any way. Meaning, if all parties wanted to claim their fair share, the only way for the fair share to be delivered is to either 1) change the content of the Quran or 2) blood to be spilled as it is mathematically impossible. The beauty of this first introduction to the Truth is that the examination of this particular verse of the Quran provide not strawmans nor easily twistable arguments, but cold hard numerical data whose discrepancy can be objectively observed. Therefore, it can be concluded that either:

• Allah's words are incorrect, or

• Allah's words are incorrect, that arbitrary judgements from mortal humans (tafsirs) are required to bend the verse and make this simple arithmetical problem workable.

The second item to put into question is the creation of the earth. Here, the writers of the Quran clearly demonstrate a primitive understanding of cosmology, as their hypothesis directly contradict the accepted model of the formation of the earth.

The Non-standard Model

Upon investigation, the verse clearly revealed a conflict between modern science and the Quran's creation mythology:

[b][/b]

Order of happening	Modern Science	The Noble Quran
1	Big Bang, formation of molecules	Formation of the earth
2	Formation of the stars, including the sun	Formation of mountains
3	Formation of planet earth	Formation of natural resources
4	Formation of mountains through tectonic plates, volcanic activities	Formation of the seven skies
5	Formation of life	Formation of stars, including the sun (?)

The reason the Young Foxes recommends these verses to be stripped naked next is because they reveal not just an incorrect trivia, but opened a pandora of systematic ignorance deeply rooted within the writers of the Quran. This verse's claim is strengthened by Quran 2:29, which stated that "It is He who created for you all of that which is on the earth. Then He directed Himself to the heaven, [His being above all creation], and made them seven heavens, and He is Knowing of all things." The atheist should first point out about Quran's claim in the creation of stars, which are little lamps sticking on the roof called "sky" that are apparently formed AFTER the creation of mountains. Then there comes the hard questions of whether the "sustenance" for creatures (fruits, etc?) can exist without the sun. It is also stated thats the creation of the content of the earth took twice as longer as the creation of the skies, which is simply incorrect. The whole universe is also created only in six days. A lot of people believe in a young earth point of view, but most point out to hadiths and exegesis that stated that a day in the hereafter is the same as, at most, 50.000 years in the world. This means the creation of the universe took only around about 300.000 years. Compared to the actual age of the universe, observed to be 13.772.000.000 years, this means the Quran possesses an innacuracy rate of more than 4.59 million percent.

Of course, as stated by the next verse, if you don't believe in what the Quran said, Allah will become angry and strike you with lightning [Quran 41:13].

Suspiciously, this notion fits perfectly into the hypothesis that Muhammad believed the earth to be flat, in accordance to the ancient model popular during his era (thus the "He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface"). But that notion should be sheleved for later, for now, the atheist can start questioning the targets on their materials of choice, e.g. stars being lamps sticking on the sky whose fire can be thrown to the devil [Quran 67:5] (as opposed to celestial objects millions of times bigger than the earth, as modern science have observed). Or that everything comes in two gender [Quran 36:36], which is contradicted by the existence of monogender creatures such as whip-tail lizards. Or bacteria, genderless creatures which constitutes a large percentage of all life on earth, thereby rendering Quran's gender dichotomy claim irrelevant.

There is a plethora of aspects that can be chosen, the most being related to biology and astronomy. Adam creation myth is a particularly popular method to highlight the Muslim's own habit of cherrypicking and self-denial. A lot of Muslim refuse to acknowledge the prevailing theory of Darwinian natural selection, or accept it but maintain that Adam and Eve is special and are not a descendant of ancient apes. They cite "lack of evidence" as their reason. This ignores two things: firstly is the overwhelming evidence supporting the theory of evolution and zero evidence against it. Secondly, Muhammad made this claim:

This hadith fully demonstrates the reason behind why the atheist must be patient in listening the Muslim's arguments against the atheist's questioning: so that it can be turned against Islam itself. For example, it is claimed that evolution is "just a theory" because of the lack of evidence (wrong). Well, if Adam's height is really 27 m as Muhammad claimed, still believed by the vast majority of Muslims in 1997, then there ought to be fossils of 7-story tall giants or at least smaller found somewhere on this world. However this is clearly not the case. Therefore, without evidence, Islam is just... a theory.

All of this scientific discrepancies will be met with opposition, obviously, and atheists will then be told to consult to ulemas or the tafsirs. This clearly demonstrate a grave weakness of the Quran and Hadith: that the two are objectively not enough to be the guidance of Islam, let alone humanity, and we have to resort to man-fabricated tafsirs and mortal opinions of Muhammad's friends and scholars, with their own human judgement and immorality. But despite the fact that most of this so-called scholars are senile anti-LGBT bigots from backwater deserts locked within their primitive moral system, this is a great opportunity for the atheist to deliver the critical blow.

Tafsirs: mopping the floor with a muddy water

By now, the atheist have demonstrated the flagrant unreliability of the Quran and Hadiths if it is left to stand alone. Most will then hesitantly agree: the meaning of the Quran and Hadiths are far from a high-quality guidance that can be easily followed. So most Muslims expects, by resorting to the tafsirs, all discrepancies will be cleared and all doubt will evaporate.

Boy.

The atheist can start from anywhere, for example, an exegesis about the problematic and completely unreliable inheritance law writren on Quran 4:11-12 mentioned earlier. Here, the atheist can elaborate on how ancient clerics are forced to change the content of the Quran to force the Quran's irreconcilable mathematical mistake to work, and the resulting different figures from different sources contradicted eachother, a humorous situation to be in for a supposedly perfect and unchangeable system that will last until the end of spacetime. This is okay, however the Young Foxes recommends a straightforward solution: Jalalayn's tafsir of Quran 88:20.

As a background, the past Islamic Khilafah isn't some sort of backwater hellhole relying on oil to survive. It instead a vast and growing empire, complete with all of its usual empire things: economic growth, trade, large militaries, horrific slave trade, war crimes, colonialism, etc. But more importantly are its science, who greatly expanded during the Muslim golden age under famous Muslim scientists such as Avicenna and Al-Farabi. (That is, until a bigoted ulema called Al Ghazali and his gang decided to declare those scientists as apostates, tried to kill them for that, and irreparably destroyed Islam's technological and scientific superiority. Religious fanatics have ruined everything more than just once.)

With such progress early in its time, it is common knowledge for past Islamic scientists that the earth's shape is a sphere. So two birds are killed using this tafsir: first, that by relying on tafsirs, we might – or more importantly, are certain – to go to the wrong way. If a person only rely on the Quran, Hadith, and tafsirs for guidance, he will believe that the earth is flat. Secondly, and this is more important, the verse revealed a surprising and horrifying fact: most ulemas of the past believes that the earth is flat and "not a sphere."

This complete systematic ignorance of past ulemas provides a stong case for the atheist, that the ulemas' words and fatwas should be just ignored and declared irrelevant. If their view on the shape of the earth are mistaken – in an era where it is a common knowledge – then it is obvious that these senile, stupid, sexist, and sickly ulemas do not possess any credibility to pass judgements about Islam. If they are incapable to be correct in the most basic of facts, then they are incapable of determining whether the dhimmi caste is legit or not, or whether LGBT should be killed for their sexuality or not. So TL;DR, ignore the ancient clerics, ignore the Salafs, ignore the bigoted ulemas, and only follow the people with actual credibility.

These "people" are to be the moderates. More on that later.

For now, if carried by the right methods, the atheist have now exposed two horrificly stinky carcass rotting within the body of Islam: scientific errors in the Quran, which BTW haven't gone away, and the dilapidated Chinese quality of the ancient ulemas thst the Muslim had relied upon for years. This is when the atheist should to be more specific, the time when they should start unleashing the strategy called "poisoning the well". If Jalalayn, and Qurtubi (who also believed that the earth is flat) have demonstrated that kind irreparable and embarrassing mistake, then the obvious thing to the next would be to discredit ALL of the tafsirs and judgements that they have ever said written throughout their life. Someone with an ignorance this flagrant cannot be trusted to dictate our daily morals, let alone our laws.

This, in itself, will bring chaos upon the existing Islamic norms, as Tafsir Qurtubi is one of the Salafis' favourite tafsir. More importantly, the atheist also sow doubt to the authenticity of other tafsirs – what if, hidden in the thousands of pages, lies more and more and more and more stinky rotting carcass? The Muslim is now faced with a growing threat, that the tafsirs might not be enough to correct the flagrant discrepancies and errors contained within the Quran. At this critical time, the atheist needs to be prepared to deliver the devaststing knockout blow.

The Knockout Blow

In many ways, Islam parallels communism: the us vs them mentality, the un-inclusive brotherhood, the dream of establishing an globalist state that adheres to a wicked set of ideology, the legalization of violence. One of their closest characteristic is the bloatedly confusing bureaucracy. The Quran is uselessly inconclusive and unclear, the hadiths are unreliable (what kind of legal system would base itself on oral transfer of information, losing hundreds of thousands of its contents in the process while having to compete fabricated ones, impossible to be rechecked to today's era?), so many Muslims rely on bureaucratic diktats produced by the ruling nomenklatura called "ulemas", one of its largest pillar is their tafsirs. Tear down that pillar, and the whole system might collapse into unrecognizable chaos. Not really a sign of a sturdy divine system meant to last until the end of the world; suspiciously, it aligns more with somekind of apocalyptic cult with all of its tenets.

With that in mind, the atheist should bring the Muslim's attention to Quran 68:1. A very normal verse, and it is. Only a few small irregularities contained in its tafsir that might pose some problems.

According to Dr. Zakir Naik, a popular Indian preacher (currently under investigation for the fraud of charity funds, however), the best tafsirs available are At-Tabari, then Ibn Kathir, while Qurtubi is also good.

Well, there goes the big pillars holding Islam's orderly existence.

Therefore, through a method called "reading", the atheist can conclude four points:

1. That the Quran and hadiths possesses some fatal discrepancies and irregularities,

2. That the tafsirs and ulema consensus are hopelessly useless because they are even worse in determining what's right and what's not,

3. That the whole bureaucratic divine laws includes in it a serious system defect that enables things like this to happen,

4. That all of this things greatly reduce the supposed divinity and clarity of the religion of Islam.

From this four points, the atheist should concentrate on not how Islam is #destroyed, but instead on the first parameter: showing that irreligiousity is scientifically far more superior to Islam. The list of defects within Muhammad's creativity must therefore be followed by a direct comparison to reality.

Questions answered... ish

By now, the atheist will have been barraged by a heapton of questions. Who created the universe then, how can this and that exist without God, where did A and B come from, etc. These questions completely missed the point: the whole purpose of such exposé of Islam is to enlighten the possibility that Islam might be the wrong religion. The atheist must therefore not be swayed into pointless debates; rather, he must keep pressing on their original question: why do you 1) believe in God and 2) believe in Allah specifically. Question 1) are hard to be tackled with comfortable certainity; question 2), however, are not the case, as demonstrated earlier.

But it is not enough to point out that "you're going in the wrong lane," rather, the atheist should point out that a better lane exist. As such, they should attempt to explain human's present knowledge as observed through the scientific method, while sprinkling theories and hypothesises that can serve as much, much stronger theory to the Allah hypothesis currently believed by many people. During this period, the atheist must be careful into the trap of religious arrogance, but instead promote the value of an open mind and the habit of weighing theories according to their respective feasibilities. As the Fox said during the 1996 Zakartah Mubes (Congress):

After the atheist felt that they had satisfyingly established grounds for Islam's scientific inferiority, it's time to move one to morality.

Macroscopic Stalins

Before continuing, the atheist must be satisfied in his demonstration that Islam is scientifically inferior to irreligiousity. While this is in no way will #destroy a person's faith in Islam – as by definition, faith requires no logic – a good atheist would be able to disarm his target's Islam-based violent tendencies and turn them into an open-minded human who are willing to listen to more than one point of view.

With that in mind, the atheist can now move to the second parameter: demonstrating that Islam is morally inferior. A good start would be the one that directly affects the atheist themself, someone who is questioning the sanctity of Islam and is spreading his doubts to others.

According to the Quran,

This particularly sadistic Quran verse don't actually orders Muslims to murder those who opposes them, something that the atheist must recognize. The verses, rooted in the primitive morality of vengeance and revenge, merely tell its followers to round up and mass-murder those who refused to surrender – a clear war crime in violation of the Geneva Convention. Not to mention its ambiguous elastic law on what constitutes "they". But what it tell are Allah's general attitude to those who opposes him, which is a good point to start.

Although, one might argue that vocal atheists are "waging war against Allah" or "spreading corruption on the earth", of which they are eligible to be sentenced to death like this:

But now we open the hadiths, which revealed what Islam have to say about those who think:

Is this religion really superior in morality?

Ignoring the fact for a second that Khalifah 'Ali ibn Abi Thalib, supposedly a great man that should be an inspiration for all Muslims, burned a bunch of people to death for the vile crime of leaving Islam, these hadiths reveals the horrors that atheists in Dwipantara have to cope and live with. This is also the reason why the atheist must be certain that he had explained Islam's scientific inferiority with satisfaction; if not, the target Muslim might be reminded that apostates must be rounded up and killed, phone the police, and the atheist will be beheaded publicly in front of TU Kemang Traditional Market before the weekend.

The Innocence of Muhammad

A lot of Muslims hide behind the presumed postulate: "Muhammad is kind and a lawful good, therefor such barbarities will surely not be accepted by him." Not necessarily a bad thing: this maladjusted premise is especially beneficial in countering Salafist Islamism's barbaric ideas. Those who believed in this fictitious persona of Muhammad are usually more tolerant and open-minded, as opposed to the radical who are much closer to Islam's true reality. However, as the focus of the atheist is to increase the number of non-Muslims, so that atheists can have a strong and effective political bloc that are able to debate and pass pro-rights legislations.

So instead of following the strategy of the moderates, the atheist should concentrate on a few case studies exposing the conman he really was: a warlord and a cult leader. Here are some cases that are recommended by the Young Foxes.

The Genocide of Banu Quraizhah

In Hijra year 5 (627 AD), on the approval of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad, almost nine hundred Jews of a Medinan tribe named Banu Qurayza were massacred by Muslims. The killing began early in the day, ending in torchlight. Those who escaped death – innocent women and children – were taken captive and sold at slave markets.

According to the Quran,

However, to better understand the context, we must look at the historical records found in the tafsirs.

So under Muhammad's primitive dictatorship, a tribal conflict occured, resulting in a sadistic bloodshed unthinkable to the standards of the modern civilized 1990's. People are killed in mass, without a trial, without even considering what are each person's role in the tribal conflict. Instead, every and each of Qurayzan above the age of puberty (~11 years old) are rounded up and genocided without mercy or differentiation, while the women and children are kidnapped and sold into slavery. This verse speaks volume about what Islam and Muhammad is all about: primitive tribal warlords, busied with primitive tribal conflicts whose insane brutality are no where near a guidance for the men of the modern era.

One also must remember about the scale of this conflict: there are only so much tribe around Muhammad's settlement at the era. This greatly escalated the horrific crime, as they are isolated small tribes in the middle of the desert – one tribe being genocided off the face of the earth is a big deal. It is like an European conflict occured, and then Germany rounded up and killed all of the millions upon millions of the male citizen of France, while enslaving the rest.

Nearby villages faces the same fate. Due to the commonly occuring tribal conflict – Islam, make no mistake, is spread through the sword – Muhammad's army attacked and plundered the settlement and abduct their women and children to become slaves or sex slaves, which are then raped. Three of such villages are Banu Anbar, Banu al-Mustaliq, and Khaybar. Muhammad's mafia state also conducted a large number of raids by attacking infidel caravans, kill the members and take their wealth. During the Battle of Hunain, Muhammad's army also abducted many women to be made sex slaves, but when they wanted to rape those kidnapped innocents, they were concerned because their husbands were polytheists. Being a good-not man that he is, Muhammad then authored a Quran verse that fully promoted the raping of female captives.

Before pressing on to a specific field on Muhammad's various crimes against humanity, the atheist should elaborate on the second parameter being discussed: Islam's moral inferiority compared to irreligiousness.

Jim Crow Slavery – Rape Edition

The Arab slave trade is the intersection of slavery and trade surrounding the Arab world and Indian Ocean, mainly in Western and Central Asia, Northern and Eastern Africa, India, and Europe. This barter occurred chiefly between the medieval era and continues to this present day, which has been greatly expanded since the establishment of the Khilafah.

Islam limited the sources of slaves which existed before the mission of the Prophet to just one source, namely slavery resulting from capturing prisoners from among the infidels, including women and children.

Shaykh al-Shanqeeti said: The reason why a person may be taken as a slave is his being a infidel and waging war against Allaah and His Messenger. If Allah enables the Muslims who are striving and sacrificing their lives and their wealth and all that Allah has given them to make the word of Allah supreme over the infidels, then He allows them to enslave the infidels when they capture them, unless the ruler chooses to free them or to ransom them, if that serves the interests of the Muslims.

In the Khilafah, millions upon millions of slaves are harvested from occupied colonies or provinces rife with non-Muslim resistance. In Dwipantara, the largest supply region are Bali, West Papua, and North Sumatra. Women and children are the favourites: children are easier to be broken mentally by traders and sold to work in mines, plantation, factories, or houses. Female captives meanwhile are precious objects: they are especially popular to be made sex slaves by the habib oligarchs and raped continuously until, after a few year, their sexual value degrades.

According to the Quran,

These verses clearly legalizes the practice of slavery and sex exploitation, a crime against humanity. The atheist must however not make wild strawman insults, but take notice that Islam has actually devised a great way to normalize the enslavement of fellow humans as okay. As Muhammad decreed, if we want to commit this horrific crime against humanity, we must do it nicely and politely. We shouldn't flog them too hard, give them enough food, and those who freed their slaves wiill be given many rewards from Allah. A brilliant solution to normalize the enslavement of fellow human beings.

Of course, Muhammad also actively approved the abduction, rape, and flogging of female prisoner of war and/or slaves:

Compare this to the #MeToo movement in western countries.

From this descriptions of Islam's primitive moral system, among many, the true nature of Muhammad and his oligharcal companions are uncovered: warlords. Violent tribal cult-based warlords, raiding and pillaging its rivals with power and wealth and lust as their goal. And they all have committed as set of horrific breaches:

1. Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of a crime against peace.

2. Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace.

3. War crimes, including: intentionally killing civilians, torturing, pillaging, giving no quarter, and egregiously violating the principles of distinction and proportionality, and military necessity.

4. Crimes against humanity, including: genocide, slavery, sex slavery, deportation, ethnic cleansing, extrajudicial punishments, torture, rape, political persecution, religious persecution, and dehumanization of fellow humans.

These, under 1946 Nuremberg laws, showed that Muhammad and his companions are eligible to be sentenced to death for their crimes, and hanged next to their fellow human rights criminals, such as Seys-Inquart and Kaltenbrunner. And while the roles of each person varies – 'Ali, for example, are much more harsh and his criminal count would be higher – it is clear that someone who can be indicted with Nazi war crimes isn't really a good role model to be followed.[/font]