General Assembly Resolutions
Since the rise of the World Assembly from the ashes of its predecessor, the Bureaucracy That Cannot Be Named, WA member nations have worked tirelessly to improve the standard of the world. That, or tried to force other nations to be more like them. But that's just semantics.
Below is every World Assembly resolution ever passed.
View: All | Historical | General Assembly | Security Council
«12. . .414243444546. . .144145»
General Assembly Resolution # 213
Privacy Protection Act
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
The General Assembly,
Believing that each and every person has the right to keep certain affairs private,
Recognizing that a void in international law currently exists with regard to this matter,
Seeking to provide basic protection of the right to privacy for the good of all peoples,
1. Declares that every person has a right to privacy that extends to all lawful actions that occur out of public view and to all lawful actions, places, and other matters for which a subjective expectation of privacy and a reasonable, or objective, expectation of privacy exist;
2. Prohibits infringement on the right to privacy by member states, their political subdivisions, and all state (governmental) actors thereof within their respective areas of jurisdiction subject to this resolution and past and future resolutions enacted by this Assembly;
3. Affirms that this resolution does not protect privacy with regard to unlawful actions (or matters) and actions that occur within public view;
4. Further affirms the legality of the following under the law of this Assembly as not infringing on the right to privacy:
Conducting or attempting to conduct a legal arrest or pursuing a criminal suspect;
Conducting a search or seizure with a warrant or similar authorization because of a possible legal violation by the person or possibly involving the person who is being searched, whose property is being searched, or whose property is being seized;
Conducting a search or seizure without a warrant or similar authorization because a compelling public interest exists (for example, there is an imminent threat to public safety);
Monitoring or conducting legal surveillance of a criminal suspect or an associate;
Requiring that a person testify about something that is private when violations of the law are suspected or during the course of a lawful trial;
5. Allows persons to waive their privacy rights so long as uncoerced and informed consent is provided;
6. Clarifies that reasonable, or objective, expectations of privacy might vary regarding similar actions, places, or other matters in different jurisdictions because of differences in culture and so forth;
7. Notes that this resolution provides only minimum protections of the right to privacy and that member states themselves or this Assembly may enact greater protections of the right to privacy than what is provided in this resolution; and
8. Expresses the openness of this Assembly to further debate and consideration of legislation regarding privacy rights in more specific areas, especially for circumstances in which the rights and obligations of the individual are unclear or unassured.
Passed: |
For: | 7,427 | 70.1% |
Against: | 3,173 | 29.9% |
General Assembly Resolution # 214
Repeal: “Intangible Cultural Heritage”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #207 “Intangible Cultural Heritage” (Category: Education and Creativity; Area of Effect: Cultural Heritage) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
The General Assembly,
ACKNOWLEDGES the importance of protecting and preserving cultural customs and practices;
BELIEVES that specific forms of intangible cultural heritage, while not strictly harmful to national populations, should be reasonably restricted in the interests of public morality, the rights of others, economics and development, national security, or other compelling reasons;
HIGHLIGHTS that the resolution in questions prevents member nations from compelling their citizens to obey pre-existing laws if such laws contradict any form of culture, regardless of the more important concerns outlined above, so long as such "culture" doesn't cause damage to society as a whole;
OUTRAGED that such a resolution may prevent further international legislation on topics such as animal cruelty and abuse, or others practices that may be considered barbaric, but are included in the definition of "intangible culture;"
CONCLUDES that such a resolution, while meritorious in its intent, causes much more harm than good;
Hereby,
REPEALS General Assembly Resolution #207 "Intangible Cultural Heritage.
Passed: |
For: | 8,694 | 88.6% |
Against: | 1,121 | 11.4% |
General Assembly Resolution # 215
Repeal: “Organ and Blood Donations Act”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #175 “Organ and Blood Donations Act” (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
THE WORLD ASSEMBLY:
REALIZES that repealing GAR#175, "Organ and Blood Donations Act, will not outlaw organ and blood donations and transplants within WA member nations,
BELIEVES, additionally, that the shortcomings of the resolution require its repeal in order to allow WA member nations to most effectively perform life-saving organ and blood transplants.
HIGHLIGHTS the wording of Clause 7, which states: Forbids transplantation or transfusion of infected and/or diseased blood, organs, tissues, or components thereof from one person (a donor) to another person (a recipient).
RECOGNIZES that the wording of this clause does not allow for any flexibility with regards to such transplants, even if such a transplant would be consented to by the prospective recipient.
UNDERSTANDS that some infections, such as Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Cytomegalovirus (CMV), and Hepatitis B & C (HBV & HCV) may be spread from donor to recipient during a transplantation or transfusion process, which means that individuals with these diseases shall be considered infected and/or diseased under the terms of this resolution.
DETAILS the following:
CMV is a disease that may affect a substantial portion of a given nation's population.
CMV-positive blood and components can be safely transfused into otherwise healthy recipients, even though such transfusions are likely to spread the disease to CMV-negative recipients.
CMV-positive organs and tissues can and have been transplanted safely to CMV-negative recipients in need when associated with appropriate anti-viral treatments.
Hepatitis B (HBV), Hepatitis C (HCV), and Human Immunodeficiency (HIV) viruses are diseases that affect varying amounts of individuals within a given population.
HBV, HCV, and HIV-positive donors can and have successfully donated organs to a recipient who tests positive for the same disease that they have.
Many individuals who are in need of organ transplants may be willing to take an organ that is HBV, HCV, or HIV-positive as receiving an organ would prolong their life even if they were to contract a new disease in the process.
Clause 7 forbids the transplantation of organs from individuals who test positive for CMV, HBV, HCV, and HIV, which means that each of the above examples are currently prohibited under WA law.
REGRETS that the unfortunate wording of this clause does not allow for flexibility in the handling of donations and transplants, which prevents member states from instituting common-sense practices that do not harm public health and may provide a net benefit for individual patients.
LAMENTS that the scarcity of resources available for transfusion and transplantation is adversely impacted by this resolution and increases the possibility that those patients in need of an organ transplant will die prior to receiving an organ that can save their lives.
DECLARES that individual recipients, in coordination with informed recommendations from their health care provider(s), should be allowed to give their informed consent for such procedures that are outlawed by this resolution.
HOPES that the WA will consider future legislation on this subject to rectify the aforementioned flaws while still assuring the safety and availability of blood, blood components, organs, and tissues in order to save lives of individuals in all WA member nations.
REPEALS GAR#175, "Organ and Blood Donations Act."
Passed: |
For: | 8,832 | 87.7% |
Against: | 1,241 | 12.3% |
General Assembly Resolution # 216
Repeal: “Stem Cells For Greater Health”
A resolution to repeal previously passed legislation.
General Assembly Resolution #49 “Stem Cells For Greater Health” (Category: Social Justice; Strength: Significant) shall be struck out and rendered null and void.
THE WORLD ASSEMBLY:
DECLARES that repealing GAR#49, "Stem Cells for Greater Health," will not prohibit stem cell treatments in WA member nations.
RECOGNIZES the shortcomings of this Resolution, which include:
The emphasis it places solely on stem-cell research:
A broader base of support for innovative medical research may improve the overall health and well-being of individuals within WA member nations.
Some nations may have access to technology that is more advanced than stem-cell research, which limits the usefulness of this resolution.
The requirement with regards to the WHA funding and conducting research into stem cells alone prevents the WHA from focusing its resources towards the most promising and effective research. Instead, the WHA is required to use their resources on stem cell research even in the face of technological advances which may make stem cell research obsolete.
The failure to ensure patient access and/or affordability of stem cell treatments resulting from the research and development covered in this resolution.
The automatic inclusion of "All breakthroughs and developments ... into the Public Domain" through this resolution waives the intellectual property rights of those who make groundbreaking discoveries and may also discourage, or at least slow, the development of new innovations.
REGRETS the lack of sufficient and necessary regulations and/or guidelines when harvesting stem cells as the resolution only states that Stem Cells must be harvested in the most humane and least destructive way possible.
NOTES that:
Consent - specifically uncoerced, informed consent - should be obtained from the donor or legal guardian of stem cell tissue, which is not required within this resolution.
Stem cells should be harvested as effectively and efficiently as possible, while minimizing the risk to the donor.
Demand for stem cells may have increased as a result of this resolution, which in turn may have resulted in unethical methods of stem cell harvesting and/or the exploitation of stem cell donors.
BELIEVES that individuals and/or private organizations that discover new stem cell innovations should retain their intellectual property rights for a period of time, in accordance with other international laws on the subject.
ACKNOWLEDGES that the World Assembly has previously affirmed the freedom of choice with regards to medical treatment and the right to medically essential drugs and treatment.
LAMENTS, however, the lack of sufficient protections for donors of stem cells within the text of this resolution.
UNDERSTANDS that this resolution is not only flawed and insufficient but may also serve as an impediment to the development of new innovations in medical technology and treatment.
ENCOURAGES the World Assembly to consider future legislation in order to promote the development of effective, cutting edge technologies in the fields of health and science.
REPEALS GAR#49, "Stem Cells For Greater Health."
Passed: |
For: | 8,079 | 84.6% |
Against: | 1,466 | 15.4% |
General Assembly Resolution # 217
Biomedical Donor Rights
A resolution to improve worldwide human and civil rights.
THE WORLD ASSEMBLY:
BELIEVES that all individuals should be accorded specific rights and protections under WA law.
REALIZES that many live donors of biomedical tissues often are donors for altruistic reasons and may receive no personal benefit from the procedure.
WISHES to ensure that donors of biomedical tissues shall not be exploited or discriminated against in any way throughout the donation process.
SPECIFIES that biomedical tissues shall include, at minimum, the following:
Blood and blood products, such as platelets and plasma.
Organs, such as the kidneys, liver, and heart.
Stem cells, such as embryonic stem cells, those found in the bone marrow and the umbilical cord, and other adult stem cells.
DETAILS that "biomedical procedures" shall include, at minimum, the donation, harvesting, transplantation, or transfusion of biomedical tissues.
DECLARES that prospective donors of biomedical tissues shall not be discriminated against without a valid medical rationale, such as blood and tissue typing or the presence of a dangerous contagion.
REQUIRES that the donation process for biomedical procedures shall involve:
Techniques that are as humane as is practicable using appropriate sterile technique for the procedure in question.
Testing and typing of the donor and donated biomedical tissues in order to:
Ensure that the donor, if a living donor, is healthy enough to undergo the donation procedure.
Determine whether or not a disease or infection is present in the biomedical tissue.
Simplify the matching of donated biomedical tissues with recipients so as to minimize negative transfusion reactions, biomedical tissue rejection, and the transference of disease or infection.
MANDATES that prospective donors shall be given all medically relevant facts regarding the biomedical procedure prior to obtaining their uncoerced, informed consent.
A legally completed advance health care directive (e.g. living will) shall be followed in order to respect the wishes of the individual in question.
In the absence of a legally completed advance health care directive, WA member nations may permit an individual's legal guardian or next-of-kin to provide uncoerced, informed consent on behalf of a donor in the event that the individual in question is under the threshold of majority or is otherwise unable to understand the information in question.
RECOMMENDS that individual WA member nations adopt an opt-out system for biomedical tissue donation from irreversibly "brain dead" donors, in the absence of a legally completed advance health care directive.
DECREES that the medical staff that determines whether or not an individual is irreversibly "brain dead" shall not include members of the transplant staff and shall not be influenced to provide false declarations that an individual is irreversibly "brain dead."
PERMITS individual WA Nations and their health care systems to delay or defer donation of biomedical tissues due to a donor's co-existing medical condition, which may place a potential recipient at risk; if such a medical condition exists, WA nations are urged to make all reasonable attempts at treatment so as to allow the donation to occur.
Passed: |
For: | 8,856 | 91.6% |
Against: | 816 | 8.4% |