For a long time, moderates have been building an image of Islam that supports peace and love. Through arduous efforts, barbarities such as the mass murder of apostates, the dhimmi caste system, slavery, and many other integral characterics of Salafi Islamism are in the process of being branded as 'Un-Islamic'.
Cooperation between the two groups are organized by a secret society called the Young Foxes. It took form of a "hammer and anvil" strategy, taking advantage of the thick atmosphere of pro-Islam political correctness that dictates political debates.
There are three aims of this alliance:
To get rid of Islamist Salafism's kegilaan nasional (national insanity) and all of its vicious elements from Dwipantara.
To establish a secular state where all citizen are equal, free to live, to pursue happiness, and to practice their belief (or lack thereof).
To increase the numbers of atheists and moderates within the people. Irreligiousity is targeted to spread to ~20% of citizens and the moderates 45%, meaning that combined with non-Muslims (~10%), pro-Republikens will control three quarters of the national population.
Of course, selfish interests are involved. The atheists also have another goal, which follows the ancient strategy of divide and conquer: create a large and bitter schism between fanatical and moderate Muslims. The moderates meanwhile wanted to paint the atheists as a disease symptom that appears due to the Khilafah's extremism, and by eliminating the source of problem – Salafist Islamism – the number of atheists will also drop. This not an uncommon knowledge, a reason why the Young Foxes network has been very important.
1. Atheists: Hammer
TL;DR, demonstrate that irreligiousness posesses both clear scientific and moral superiority compared to the primitive Islam.
After the Khilafah's takeover in the late '60s, atheism began to really expand as a serious topic in public discourse, as many started to view Islam not as a mere tool used by problematic dictator-wannabes, but the actual source of problems itself. Especially with Salafist Islam, characterized by its obedience not only to Allah and His prophet, but also the first three generations of Islam – a goldmine for backwards and offensively bigoted ideas only comparable to the Apartheid and the Jim Crow states.
As a "hammer", atheists took the job of criticizing Islam directly, without being held back by political correctness or social norms. This is not easy. Children have been indoctrinated since childhood that apostates, especially those who challenge Islam, is the worst of the worst of creatures – far worse than rats and cholera. Not only is it perfectly fine to kill apostates, it is also a desirable. Atheists therefore have to be very careful in travelling the deadly marshes of the Khilafah, carrying the torch of truth while avoiding the watchful eyes of the deadly ogres that will kill you when they saw your true form: your parents and your friends.
Despite the dangers, however, the Young Foxes strongly, strongly suggest to all atheist to come out sooner or later. The reason? After studying the struggle of LGBT activists in western countries, it is now known that people are much more tolerant to one group if they have a friend or family member that belongs to that particular group. Meaning, if more and more people know an atheist or apostate, more people will be tolerant to this group – a necessary step in the advancement of the atheist's quality of life, since at the present time, the death penalty looms over the back of each and every apostate, both open or hiding. Therefore, for the greater good thst is the advancement of atheists as a group and Dwipantara as a nation, atheist should start communicating their beliefs to their aquaintences.
However, without actual numbers, it will be hard for atheists to propose and pass reforms that will kill the artificial system of systematic persecution and criminalization of apostates currently implemented by the ruling regime. So outside of coming out, atheists are also strongly encouraged to share their views to the world, and try to convert as many people as they can from pious Muslims to become, if not an atheist, then at least a tolerant and open-minded moderate Muslim.
TL;DR, to secure a nation safe for atheists to live, atheists must go on the offensive.
Jailed activist waiting for his death sentence. For his vile crime of distributing uncomfortable facts about Islam and the Khilafah, he will be beheaded publicly in front of the TU Kemang Traditional Market, a sadistic practice in accordance with Islam's "submission through terror" doctrine.
First and foremost, the most obvious concern of fellow atheists are the life of its brothers. With death sentence hanging above their head every day, the Young Foxes and its associates worked hard to ensure the safety of its members. They operate secret networks to sell and distribute banned literatures – a stable source of income, as this includes the highly popular illegal western and Japanese music and movie CDs – and rescue teams to help fellow atheists who are in danger of being exposed of even murdered by their family and friends.
Secret trainings on how to spread the truth without getting yourself killed is also conducted, either through the new internet or through clandestine meetings operated by independent disconnected cells (so if one is uncovered, it does not spread to the other cells). Many young free thinkers volunteered on programs to help the poor and the left behind, as teachers or social workers. While in mission, they then try to seed doubt in the populace disillusioned by the Khilafah, while sowing sympathy with the atheist movement and teach the value of doublechecking, scepticism, and open-mindedness. The other and arguably more important battleground is school and campuses, where information is more easily passed around and discussed.
Braver atheists go down directly to the streets, however. The most well-known speaker, a masked public figure calling himself "the Fox", have even made it to regional television due to his respectful, polite, and humorous upbringing – far from the holocaustic tirades commonly shouted by angry ulemas. Campus meetings are also known as a hotbed for vocals, while vandalism are a common method to show to a neighborhood, "atheist was here". This acts is especially important, as the irreligious network need to build up a persona of unstoppable snowball that lurks from every crevices, which serves three purpose: to inflate the perceived number of atheists, still a long way from the targeted population of 20%, to increase confidence within members, and as a part of its secret deal with the moderates to balloon atheism's supposed existential threat to Islam, enabling the moderates to pass necessary reforms.
A common way for atheists to sow doubt is to fake an innocent curiousity, and get to the target not as a know-it-all jerk whose diktats have to be heed to, but an ignorant newbie seeking to ask someone with more knowledge. Then, atheists have to listen to the person's arguments with actual respect, and encourage discussion instead of shouting matches. When things go south, atheists can always hide behind the shield of "curiousity", as Muslims will naturally want to help its brother to find a way to the truth.
The flat earth on the back of a giant cosmic bull, on top of a giant whale, on top of a rock, on top of the dust. The source of this claim, Ibn Abbas' exegesis of Quran 68:1, is used by both atheists and moderates: the former to discredit Islam (or at least, the supposed clarity of the Quran), while the latter used it to kill and bury the legitimacy of ancient ulemas – if they are mistaken about the shape of the earth, their judgements in ambiguos aspects such as morality are probably worse.
In general, atheists dissect Islam by pressing on irreligiousness' two most important high ground:
Campaign usually took place between closest friends and family, after their "open-mindedness" are checked through the various methods developed by the Young Foxes – those who are too radical are too dangerous to be approached, and therefore should be left behind until the situation are favorable. Small talks will be conducted that will eventually lead to the questions, "why do you believe in God" and "why do you believe in Allah specifically." Common answers include the Quran's supposed scientific miracles and the good deeds of Muhammad.
One of the supposed miracles that is most widely quoted is the cocoklogi (forced fitting-ism) of numbers: set the Quran in specific ways, and you will get a set of angka cantik (pretty numbers). However, atheists shouldn't busy themselves in debunking the various pseudoscientific cocoklogis – by definition, is undebunkable – and instead advised to just tell about a surah within the Quran and point out is mathematical miracle-not.
Elementary, my dear Allah
Quran 4:12: In what your wives leave, your share is a half, if they leave no child; but if they leave a child, ye get a fourth; after payment of legacies and debts. In what ye leave, their share is a fourth, if ye leave no child; but if ye leave a child, they get an eighth; after payment of legacies and debts. If the man or woman whose inheritance is in question, has left neither ascendants nor descendants, but has left a brother or a sister, each one of the two gets a sixth; but if more than two, they share in a third; after payment of legacies and debts; so that no loss is caused (to any one). Thus is it ordained by Allah; and Allah is All-knowing, Most Forbearing.
Inheritance is a serious issue that have spilled countless blood, torn families apart with hate, and destroyed empires. With that in mind, you would have expected Islam to design the single best system of inheritance available in the entire spacetime. However, let's pass over the horridly sexist regulation that ignorantly generalized all men and women with vastly different income statuses into two dichotomical group, and instead focus on the problem that arise when a specific and not uncommon case occurs.
Suppose that John have a wife, daughters, a father, a mother, and some wealth. When he died, according to Quran 4:11-12, his wealth will be divided between his family in these particular fractions:
Wife: 1/8 = 3/24,
Daughters: 2/3 = 16/24,
Father: 1/6 = 4/24,
Mother: 1/6 = 4/24,
Total = 27/24=1.125
The total is more than 1, a grave arithmetical mistake. This elementary school-level error cannot be reconciled in any way. Meaning, if all parties wanted to claim their fair share, the only way for the fair share to be delivered is to either 1) change the content of the Quran or 2) blood to be spilled as it is mathematically impossible. The beauty of this first introduction to the Truth is that the examination of this particular verse of the Quran provide not strawmans nor easily twistable arguments, but cold hard numerical data whose discrepancy can be objectively observed. Therefore, it can be concluded that either:
Allah's words are incorrect, or
Allah's words are incorrect, that arbitrary judgements from mortal humans (tafsirs) are required to bend the verse and make this simple arithmetical problem workable.
The second item to put into question is the creation of the earth. Here, the writers of the Quran clearly demonstrate a primitive understanding of cosmology, as their hypothesis directly contradict the accepted model of the formation of the earth.
The Non-standard Model
Quran 41:10: And He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface, and He blessed it and determined therein its [creatures'] sustenance in four days without distinction - for [the information] of those who ask.
Quran 41:11: Then He directed Himself to the heaven while it was smoke and said to it and to the earth, "Come [into being], willingly or by compulsion." They said, "We have come willingly."
Quran 41:12: And He completed them as seven heavens within two days and inspired in each heaven its command. And We adorned the nearest heaven with stars and as protection. That is the determination of the Exalted in Might, the Knowing.
Upon investigation, the verse clearly revealed a conflict between modern science and the Quran's creation mythology:
Order of happening
The Noble Quran
Big Bang, formation of molecules
Formation of the earth
Formation of the stars, including the sun
Formation of mountains
Formation of planet earth
Formation of natural resources
Formation of mountains through tectonic plates, volcanic activities
Formation of the seven skies
Formation of life
Formation of stars, including the sun (?)
The reason the Young Foxes recommends these verses to be stripped naked next is because they reveal not just an incorrect trivia, but opened a pandora of systematic ignorance deeply rooted within the writers of the Quran. This verse's claim is strengthened by Quran 2:29, which stated that "It is He who created for you all of that which is on the earth. Then He directed Himself to the heaven, [His being above all creation], and made them seven heavens, and He is Knowing of all things." The atheist should first point out about Quran's claim in the creation of stars, which are little lamps sticking on the roof called "sky" that are apparently formed AFTER the creation of mountains. Then there comes the hard questions of whether the "sustenance" for creatures (fruits, etc?) can exist without the sun. It is also stated thats the creation of the content of the earth took twice as longer as the creation of the skies, which is simply incorrect. The whole universe is also created only in six days. A lot of people believe in a young earth point of view, but most point out to hadiths and exegesis that stated that a day in the hereafter is the same as, at most, 50.000 years in the world. This means the creation of the universe took only around about 300.000 years. Compared to the actual age of the universe, observed to be 13.772.000.000 years, this means the Quran possesses an innacuracy rate of more than 4.59 million percent.
The complete picture of Muhammad's primitive cosmology. This model is not wrong according to Islamic scriptures. If such flagrant discrepancy can be tolerated, worse believed, there ought to be some problem within the system.
Of course, as stated by the next verse, if you don't believe in what the Quran said, Allah will become angry and strike you with lightning [Quran 41:13].
Suspiciously, this notion fits perfectly into the hypothesis that Muhammad believed the earth to be flat, in accordance to the ancient model popular during his era (thus the "He placed on the earth firmly set mountains over its surface"). But that notion should be sheleved for later, for now, the atheist can start questioning the targets on their materials of choice, e.g. stars being lamps sticking on the sky whose fire can be thrown to the devil [Quran 67:5] (as opposed to celestial objects millions of times bigger than the earth, as modern science have observed). Or that everything comes in two gender [Quran 36:36], which is contradicted by the existence of monogender creatures such as whip-tail lizards. Or bacteria, genderless creatures which constitutes a large percentage of all life on earth, thereby rendering Quran's gender dichotomy claim irrelevant.
There is a plethora of aspects that can be chosen, the most being related to biology and astronomy. Adam creation myth is a particularly popular method to highlight the Muslim's own habit of cherrypicking and self-denial. A lot of Muslim refuse to acknowledge the prevailing theory of Darwinian natural selection, or accept it but maintain that Adam and Eve is special and are not a descendant of ancient apes. They cite "lack of evidence" as their reason. This ignores two things: firstly is the overwhelming evidence supporting the theory of evolution and zero evidence against it. Secondly, Muhammad made this claim:
This hadith fully demonstrates the reason behind why the atheist must be patient in listening the Muslim's arguments against the atheist's questioning: so that it can be turned against Islam itself. For example, it is claimed that evolution is "just a theory" because of the lack of evidence (wrong). Well, if Adam's height is really 27 m as Muhammad claimed, still believed by the vast majority of Muslims in 1997, then there ought to be fossils of 7-story tall giants or at least smaller found somewhere on this world. However this is clearly not the case. Therefore, without evidence, Islam is just... a theory.
A diagram from a science class from a state school in Tangharan, showing the comparison between Adam and normal contemporary humans. Ignoring the fact that such beings is biologically impossible, no proof of such giants have ever been found in the slightest.
All of this scientific discrepancies will be met with opposition, obviously, and atheists will then be told to consult to ulemas or the tafsirs. This clearly demonstrate a grave weakness of the Quran and Hadith: that the two are objectively not enough to be the guidance of Islam, let alone humanity, and we have to resort to man-fabricated tafsirs and mortal opinions of Muhammad's friends and scholars, with their own human judgement and immorality. But despite the fact that most of this so-called scholars are senile anti-LGBT bigots from backwater deserts locked within their primitive moral system, this is a great opportunity for the atheist to deliver the critical blow.
Tafsirs: mopping the floor with a muddy water
By now, the atheist have demonstrated the flagrant unreliability of the Quran and Hadiths if it is left to stand alone. Most will then hesitantly agree: the meaning of the Quran and Hadiths are far from a high-quality guidance that can be easily followed. So most Muslims expects, by resorting to the tafsirs, all discrepancies will be cleared and all doubt will evaporate.
The atheist can start from anywhere, for example, an exegesis about the problematic and completely unreliable inheritance law writren on Quran 4:11-12 mentioned earlier. Here, the atheist can elaborate on how ancient clerics are forced to change the content of the Quran to force the Quran's irreconcilable mathematical mistake to work, and the resulting different figures from different sources contradicted eachother, a humorous situation to be in for a supposedly perfect and unchangeable system that will last until the end of spacetime. This is okay, however the Young Foxes recommends a straightforward solution: Jalalayn's tafsir of Quran 88:20.
Tafsir Jalalayn: And the earth, how it was laid out flat?, and thus infer from this the power of God, exalted be He, and His Oneness? The commencing with the [mention of] camels is because they are closer in contact with it [the earth] than any other [animal]. As for His words sutihat, ‘laid out flat’, this on a literal reading suggests that the earth is flat, which is the opinion of most of the scholars of the [revealed] Law, and not a sphere as astronomers (ahl al-hay’a) have it, even if this [latter] does not contradict any of the pillars of the Law.
As a background, the past Islamic Khilafah isn't some sort of backwater hellhole relying on oil to survive. It instead a vast and growing empire, complete with all of its usual empire things: economic growth, trade, large militaries, horrific slave trade, war crimes, colonialism, etc. But more importantly are its science, who greatly expanded during the Muslim golden age under famous Muslim scientists such as Avicenna and Al-Farabi. (That is, until a bigoted ulema called Al Ghazali and his gang decided to declare those scientists as apostates, tried to kill them for that, and irreparably destroyed Islam's technological and scientific superiority. Religious fanatics have ruined everything more than just once.)
With such progress early in its time, it is common knowledge for past Islamic scientists that the earth's shape is a sphere. So two birds are killed using this tafsir: first, that by relying on tafsirs, we might – or more importantly, are certain – to go to the wrong way. If a person only rely on the Quran, Hadith, and tafsirs for guidance, he will believe that the earth is flat. Secondly, and this is more important, the verse revealed a surprising and horrifying fact: most ulemas of the past believes that the earth is flat and "not a sphere."
The square and stationary earth.
This complete systematic ignorance of past ulemas provides a stong case for the atheist, that the ulemas' words and fatwas should be just ignored and declared irrelevant. If their view on the shape of the earth are mistaken – in an era where it is a common knowledge – then it is obvious that these senile, stupid, sexist, and sickly ulemas do not possess any credibility to pass judgements about Islam. If they are incapable to be correct in the most basic of facts, then they are incapable of determining whether the dhimmi caste is legit or not, or whether LGBT should be killed for their sexuality or not. So TL;DR, ignore the ancient clerics, ignore the Salafs, ignore the bigoted ulemas, and only follow the people with actual credibility.
These "people" are to be the moderates. More on that later.
For now, if carried by the right methods, the atheist have now exposed two horrificly stinky carcass rotting within the body of Islam: scientific errors in the Quran, which BTW haven't gone away, and the dilapidated Chinese quality of the ancient ulemas thst the Muslim had relied upon for years. This is when the atheist should to be more specific, the time when they should start unleashing the strategy called "poisoning the well". If Jalalayn, and Qurtubi (who also believed that the earth is flat) have demonstrated that kind irreparable and embarrassing mistake, then the obvious thing to the next would be to discredit ALL of the tafsirs and judgements that they have ever said written throughout their life. Someone with an ignorance this flagrant cannot be trusted to dictate our daily morals, let alone our laws.
This, in itself, will bring chaos upon the existing Islamic norms, as Tafsir Qurtubi is one of the Salafis' favourite tafsir. More importantly, the atheist also sow doubt to the authenticity of other tafsirs – what if, hidden in the thousands of pages, lies more and more and more and more stinky rotting carcass? The Muslim is now faced with a growing threat, that the tafsirs might not be enough to correct the flagrant discrepancies and errors contained within the Quran. At this critical time, the atheist needs to be prepared to deliver the devaststing knockout blow.
The Knockout Blow
In many ways, Islam parallels communism: the us vs them mentality, the un-inclusive brotherhood, the dream of establishing an globalist state that adheres to a wicked set of ideology, the legalization of violence. One of their closest characteristic is the bloatedly confusing bureaucracy. The Quran is uselessly inconclusive and unclear, the hadiths are unreliable (what kind of legal system would base itself on oral transfer of information, losing hundreds of thousands of its contents in the process while having to compete fabricated ones, impossible to be rechecked to today's era?), so many Muslims rely on bureaucratic diktats produced by the ruling nomenklatura called "ulemas", one of its largest pillar is their tafsirs. Tear down that pillar, and the whole system might collapse into unrecognizable chaos. Not really a sign of a sturdy divine system meant to last until the end of the world; suspiciously, it aligns more with somekind of apocalyptic cult with all of its tenets.
With that in mind, the atheist should bring the Muslim's attention to Quran 68:1. A very normal verse, and it is. Only a few small irregularities contained in its tafsir that might pose some problems.
Tafsir At-Tabari: "Someone might say: If it is as you have described, namely, that God created the earth before the heaven, then what is the meaning of the statement of Ibn ‘Abbas told all of you by Wasil b. ‘Abd al-A‘la al-Asadi- Muhammad b. Fudayl- al-A‘mash- Abu Zabyan- Ibn ‘Abbas: The first thing God created is the Pen. God then said to it: Write!, whereupon the Pen asked: What shall I write, my lord! God replied: Write what is predestined! He continued: And the Pen proceeded to write whatever is predestined and going to be to the Coming of the Hour. God then lifted up the water vapor and split the heavens off from it. Then God created the fish (Nun), and the earth was spread out upon its back. The fish became agitated, with the result that the earth was shaken up. It was steadied by means of the mountains, for they indeed proudly tower over the earth.
I was told about the same by Wasil – Waki’ – al-A‘mash – Abu Zabyan – Ibn ‘Abbas.
According to Ibn al-Muthanna – Ibn Abi ‘Adi – Shu‘bah – Sulayman (al-A‘mash) – Abu Zabyan – Ibn ‘Abbas: The first thing created by God is the Pen. It proceeded to write whatever is going to be. God then lifted up the water vapor and the heavens were created from it. Then He created the fish, and the earth was spread out on its back. The fish moved, with the result that the earth was shaken up. It was steadied by means of the mountains, for the mountains indeed proudly tower over the earth. So he said, and he recited: “Nun. By the Pen and what they write.”
I was told the same by Tamim b. al-Muntasir – Ishaq (b. Yusuf) – Sharik (b. ‘Abdallah al-Nakha‘i) – al-A‘mash – Abu Zabyan or Mujahid – Ibn ‘Abbas, with the exception, however, that he said: And the heavens were split off from it (instead of: were created).
According to Ibn Bashshar – Yahya – Sufyan – Sulayman (al-A‘mash?) – Abu Zabyan – Ibn ‘Abbas: The first thing created by God is the Pen. God said: Write!, whereupon the Pen asked: What shall I write? God replied: Write what is predestined! He continued. And the Pen proceeded to write whatever is predestined and going to be from that day on to the Coming of the Hour. Then God created the fish. He lifted up the water vapor, and heaven was split off from it, and the earth was spread out upon the back of the fish. The fish became agitated, and as a result, the earth was shaken up. It was steadied by means of the mountains, he continued, for they proudly tower over the earth.
According to Ibn Humayd – Jarir (b. ‘Abd al-Hamid) – ‘Ata’ b. al-Sa’ib – Abu al-Duha Muslim b. Subayh – Ibn ‘Abbas: “The first thing created by God is the Pen. God said to it: Write! And it wrote whatever is going to be until the Coming of the Hour. Then God created the fish. Then he heaped up the earth upon it.”
Tafsir Ibn Kathir: It was said that Nun refers to a great whale that rides on the currents of the waters of the great ocean and on its back it carries the seven Earths, as was stated by Imam Abu Jafar Ibn Jarir. Narrated by Ibn Bashar, narrated by Yahya, narrated by Sufyan Al-Thuri, narrated by Sulayman Al-Amash, narrated by Abu Thubian, narrated by Ibn Abbas who related, “The first thing that Allah created was the pen and He said to it ‘Write’. The pen asked, ‘What shall I write?’ Allah said, ‘Write the fate of everything.’ So the pen wrote everything that shall be from that moment until judgment day.
Then Allah created the “Nun” and He caused steam to rise out of which the heavens were created and the Earth was then laid flat on nun’s back. Then the Nun became nervous and as a result the earth began to sway, but Allah fastened the earth with mountains lest the earth should move…,
It was narrated by Ibn Jarir, narrated by Ibn Hamid, narrated by Ata’a, narrated by Abu Al-Dahee, narrated by Ibn Abbas who stated, “The first thing my Lord created, may He be Exalted and Glorified, was the pen and He said to it, ‘Write.’ So the pen wrote all that will be until judgment day. Then Allah created the Nun (the whale) above the waters and he pressed the Earth into its back.
Al Tabarani narrated the same Hadith above (from the prophet Muhammad) who narrated from Abu Habib Zaid Al-Mahdi Al Marouzi, narrated by Sa’id Ibn Yaqub Al-Talqani, narrated by Mu’amal Ibn Ismail, narrated by Hamad Ibn Zaid, narrated by Ata’a Ibn Al Sa’ib, narrated by Abu Al Dahee Muslim Ibn Subaih, narrated by Ibn Abbas who stated that the prophet – may peace and blessing be upon him and his family – said, “The first things Allah created were the pen and the whale and He said to the pen ‘Write.’ The pen asked, ‘What shall I write?’ Allah replied, ‘Everything that shall be until judgment day.’ Then He said ‘Nun. By the Pen and by what they write.’ So Nun is the whale and al-Qalam is the pen.”
… Ibn Abu Nujaih stated that Ibrahim Ibn Abu Bakir was informed by Mujahid who said, “It was said that Nun is the great whale who is underneath the seven Earths.”
Tafsir Qurtubi: Mujahid related that ‘Nun’ is the whale that is underneath the seventh earth. He stated that the ‘Pen’ is what was used to write ‘Al-Thikir’ (The Remembrance – Quran). Likewise, it was also narrated by Mukatil, Murrah Al-Hamdani, Ata’ Al-Kharasani, Al Suddi and Al-Kalbi who all said, “Nun is the whale upon which all the earths are placed.”
Narrated by Abu Thabyan, narrated by Ibn Abbas who said, “The first thing that Allah created was the Pen which wrote all that shall be. Then water vapor began to rise, out of which the heavens were created. Then (Allah) created Nun (the whale) and flattened the earth on its back. When the earth began to lean, it was reinforced with mountains, which are on its surface.” Then Ibn Abbas read the verse (Surah 68:1) ‘Nun and the Pen.’
Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn Abbas: And from his narration on the authority of Ibn 'Abbas that he said regarding the interpretation of Allah's saying (Nun): '(Nun) He says: Allah swears by the Nun, which is the whale that carries the earths on its back while in Water, and beneath which is the Bull and under the Bull is the Rock and under the Rock is the Dust and none knows what is under the Dust save Allah. The name of the whale is Liwash, and it is said its name is Lutiaya'; the name of the bull is Bahamut, and some say its name is Talhut or Liyona. The whale is in a sea called 'Adwad, and it is like a small bull in a huge sea. The sea is in a hollowed rock whereby there is 4,000 cracks, and from each crack water springs out to the earth. It is also said that Nun is one of the names of the Lord; it stands for the letter Nun in Allah's name al-Rahman (the Beneficent); and it is also said that a Nun is an inkwell. (By the pen) Allah swore by the pen. This pen is made of light and its height is equal to the distance between Heaven and earth. It is with this pen that the Wise Remembrance, i.e. the Guarded Tablet, was written. It is also said that the pen is one of the angels by whom Allah has sworn, (and that which they write (therewith)) and Allah also swore by what the angels write down of the works of the children of Adam.
A whale carrying the earth on its back.
According to Dr. Zakir Naik, a popular Indian preacher (currently under investigation for the fraud of charity funds, however), the best tafsirs available are At-Tabari, then Ibn Kathir, while Qurtubi is also good.
Well, there goes the big pillars holding Islam's orderly existence.
Therefore, through a method called "reading", the atheist can conclude four points:
That the Quran and hadiths possesses some fatal discrepancies and irregularities,
That the tafsirs and ulema consensus are hopelessly useless because they are even worse in determining what's right and what's not,
That the whole bureaucratic divine laws includes in it a serious system defect that enables things like this to happen,
That all of this things greatly reduce the supposed divinity and clarity of the religion of Islam.
From this four points, the atheist should concentrate on not how Islam is #destroyed, but instead on the first parameter: showing that irreligiousity is scientifically far more superior to Islam. The list of defects within Muhammad's creativity must therefore be followed by a direct comparison to reality.
Questions answered... ish
By now, the atheist will have been barraged by a heapton of questions. Who created the universe then, how can this and that exist without God, where did A and B come from, etc. These questions completely missed the point: the whole purpose of such exposé of Islam is to enlighten the possibility that Islam might be the wrong religion. The atheist must therefore not be swayed into pointless debates; rather, he must keep pressing on their original question: why do you 1) believe in God and 2) believe in Allah specifically. Question 1) are hard to be tackled with comfortable certainity; question 2), however, are not the case, as demonstrated earlier.
But it is not enough to point out that "you're going in the wrong lane," rather, the atheist should point out that a better lane exist. As such, they should attempt to explain human's present knowledge as observed through the scientific method, while sprinkling theories and hypothesises that can serve as much, much stronger theory to the Allah hypothesis currently believed by many people. During this period, the atheist must be careful into the trap of religious arrogance, but instead promote the value of an open mind and the habit of weighing theories according to their respective feasibilities. As the Fox said during the 1996 Zakartah Mubes (Congress):
Note: 'Big Shiny Ball' refers to a popular derogatory term for the shape of Allah. While many (secretly) visualize Allah as an cosmic-sized old man floating in the sky, the idea of a bright shining concentration of light have gained tenets, as Allah is supposedly the 'first cause' of everything.
After the atheist felt that they had satisfyingly established grounds for Islam's scientific inferiority, it's time to move one to morality.
In many ways, Allah's views towards apostates scarily mimics Stalin's views of Trotskyites during the 1930's: kill those pesky critics.
Before continuing, the atheist must be satisfied in his demonstration that Islam is scientifically inferior to irreligiousity. While this is in no way will #destroy a person's faith in Islam – as by definition, faith requires no logic – a good atheist would be able to disarm his target's Islam-based violent tendencies and turn them into an open-minded human who are willing to listen to more than one point of view.
With that in mind, the atheist can now move to the second parameter: demonstrating that Islam is morally inferior. A good start would be the one that directly affects the atheist themself, someone who is questioning the sanctity of Islam and is spreading his doubts to others.
According to the Quran,
Quran 4:89: "They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah . But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper."
Quran 4:90: "Except for those who take refuge with a people between yourselves and whom is a treaty or those who come to you, their hearts strained at [the prospect of] fighting you or fighting their own people. And if Allah had willed, He could have given them power over you, and they would have fought you. So if they remove themselves from you and do not fight you and offer you peace, then Allah has not made for you a cause [for fighting] against them."
Quran 4:91: "You will find others who wish to obtain security from you and [to] obtain security from their people. Every time they are returned to [the influence of] disbelief, they fall back into it. So if they do not withdraw from you or offer you peace or restrain their hands, then seize them and kill them wherever you overtake them. And those - We have made for you against them a clear authorization."
This particularly sadistic Quran verse don't actually orders Muslims to murder those who opposes them, something that the atheist must recognize. The verses, rooted in the primitive morality of vengeance and revenge, merely tell its followers to round up and mass-murder those who refused to surrender – a clear war crime in violation of the Geneva Convention. Not to mention its ambiguous elastic law on what constitutes "they". But what it tell are Allah's general attitude to those who opposes him, which is a good point to start.
Although, one might argue that vocal atheists are "waging war against Allah" or "spreading corruption on the earth", of which they are eligible to be sentenced to death like this:
But now we open the hadiths, which revealed what Islam have to say about those who think:
"Narrated Abu Musa: A man embraced Islam and then reverted back to Judaism. Mu`adh bin Jabal came and saw the man with Abu Musa. Mu`adh asked, "What is wrong with this (man)?" Abu Musa replied, "He embraced Islam and then reverted back to Judaism." Mu`adh said, "I will not sit down unless you kill him (as it is) the verdict of Allah and His Apostle." [Sahih Bukhari 9:89:271]
"It has been reported on the authority of Abu Musa who said: I went to the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) and with me were two men from the Ash'ari tribe. One of them was on my right hand and the other on my left. Both of them made a request for a position (of authority) while the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) was brushing his teeth with a tooth-stick. He said (to me): Abu Musa (or 'Abdullah b. Qais), what do you say (about the request they have made)? I said: By God Who sent thee on thy mission with truth, they did not disclose to me what they had in their minds, and I did not know that they would ask for a position. The narrator says (while recalling this hadith): I visualise as if I were looking at the miswak of the Holy Prophet (may peace be upon him) between his lips. He (the Holy Prophet) said: We shall not or shall never appoint to the public offices (in our State) those who with to have them, but you may go, Abu Musa (or Abdullah b. Qais) (to take up your assignment). He sent him to Yemen as governor. then he sent Mu'adh b. jabal in his wake (to help him in the discharge of duties). When Mu'adh reached the camp of Abu Musa, the latter (received him and) said: Please get yourself down; and he spread for him a mattress, while there was a man bound hand and foot as a prisoner. Mu'adh said: Who is this? Abu Musa said: He was a Jew. He embraced Islam. Then he reverted to his false religion and became a Jew. Mu'adh said: I won't sit until he is killed according to the decree of Allah and His Apostle (may peace be upon him) (in this case). Abu Musa said: Be seated. It will be done. He said: I won't sit unless he is killed in accordance with the decree of Allah and His Apostle (may peace be upon him). He repeated these words thrice. Then Abu Musa ordered him (to be killed) and he was killed. Then the two talked of standing in prayer at night. One of them, i. e. Mu'adh, said: I sleep (for a part of the night) and stand in prayer (for a part) and I hope that I shall get the same reward for sleeping as I shall get for standing (in prayer)." [Sahih Muslim 20:4490]
"Narrated 'Abdullah: Allah's Apostle said, "The blood of a Muslim who confesses that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that I am His Apostle, cannot be shed except in three cases: In Qisas for murder, a married person who commits illegal sexual intercourse and the one who reverts from Islam (apostate) and leaves the Muslims." [Sahih Bukhari 9:83:17]
"Narrated 'Ali: Whenever I tell you a narration from Allah's Apostle, by Allah, I would rather fall down from the sky than ascribe a false statement to him, but if I tell you something between me and you (not a Hadith) then it was indeed a trick (i.e., I may say things just to cheat my enemy). No doubt I heard Allah's Apostle saying, "During the last days there will appear some young foolish people who will say the best words but their faith will not go beyond their throats (i.e. they will have no faith) and will go out from (leave) their religion as an arrow goes out of the game. So, where-ever you find them, kill them, for who-ever kills them shall have reward on the Day of Resurrection." [Sahih Bukhari 9:84:64]
Is this religion really superior in morality?
Ignoring the fact for a second that Khalifah 'Ali ibn Abi Thalib, supposedly a great man that should be an inspiration for all Muslims, burned a bunch of people to death for the vile crime of leaving Islam, these hadiths reveals the horrors that atheists in Dwipantara have to cope and live with. This is also the reason why the atheist must be certain that he had explained Islam's scientific inferiority with satisfaction; if not, the target Muslim might be reminded that apostates must be rounded up and killed, phone the police, and the atheist will be beheaded publicly in front of TU Kemang Traditional Market before the weekend.
The Innocence of Muhammad
Wilhem Keitel, Nazi Germany's chief of the OKW. He was sentenced to death in Nuremberg and hanged for his crimes of, among other things, planning a war of agression, genocide, other crimes against humanity, and war crimes, including the unnecessary summary executions of POWs.
A lot of Muslims hide behind the presumed postulate: "Muhammad is kind and a lawful good, therefor such barbarities will surely not be accepted by him." Not necessarily a bad thing: this maladjusted premise is especially beneficial in countering Salafist Islamism's barbaric ideas. Those who believed in this fictitious persona of Muhammad are usually more tolerant and open-minded, as opposed to the radical who are much closer to Islam's true reality. However, as the focus of the atheist is to increase the number of non-Muslims, so that atheists can have a strong and effective political bloc that are able to debate and pass pro-rights legislations.
So instead of following the strategy of the moderates, the atheist should concentrate on a few case studies exposing the conman he really was: a warlord and a cult leader. Here are some cases that are recommended by the Young Foxes.
The Genocide of Banu Quraizhah
In Hijra year 5 (627 AD), on the approval of the Islamic Prophet Muhammad, almost nine hundred Jews of a Medinan tribe named Banu Qurayza were massacred by Muslims. The killing began early in the day, ending in torchlight. Those who escaped death – innocent women and children – were taken captive and sold at slave markets.
According to the Quran,
33:27: "And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land which you had not trodden. And Allah is able to do all things."
However, to better understand the context, we must look at the historical records found in the tafsirs.
The genocide of Banu Quraizhah, where the whole male population who are baligh (above the age of puberty, or >11 years old) were genocided through sadistic beheading without any trial.
So under Muhammad's primitive dictatorship, a tribal conflict occured, resulting in a sadistic bloodshed unthinkable to the standards of the modern civilized 1990's. People are killed in mass, without a trial, without even considering what are each person's role in the tribal conflict. Instead, every and each of Qurayzan above the age of puberty (~11 years old) are rounded up and genocided without mercy or differentiation, while the women and children are kidnapped and sold into slavery. This verse speaks volume about what Islam and Muhammad is all about: primitive tribal warlords, busied with primitive tribal conflicts whose insane brutality are no where near a guidance for the men of the modern era.
One also must remember about the scale of this conflict: there are only so much tribe around Muhammad's settlement at the era. This greatly escalated the horrific crime, as they are isolated small tribes in the middle of the desert – one tribe being genocided off the face of the earth is a big deal. It is like an European conflict occured, and then Germany rounded up and killed all of the millions upon millions of the male citizen of France, while enslaving the rest.
Nearby villages faces the same fate. Due to the commonly occuring tribal conflict – Islam, make no mistake, is spread through the sword – Muhammad's army attacked and plundered the settlement and abduct their women and children to become slaves or sex slaves, which are then raped. Three of such villages are Banu Anbar, Banu al-Mustaliq, and Khaybar. Muhammad's mafia state also conducted a large number of raids by attacking infidel caravans, kill the members and take their wealth. During the Battle of Hunain, Muhammad's army also abducted many women to be made sex slaves, but when they wanted to rape those kidnapped innocents, they were concerned because their husbands were polytheists. Being a good-not man that he is, Muhammad then authored a Quran verse that fully promoted the raping of female captives.
Mohammed led a surprise attack on the Banu al-Mustaliq tribe while they were inattentive and their cattle were drinking water." [Abu Dawud, Vol. 2, No. 227]
Narrated Anas: The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, "Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned." Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the share of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her 'Mahr'. [Sahih Bukhari 5:59:512]
When Abu Sufyan heard that Muhammad’s Companions were on their way to intercept his caravan, he sent a message to the Quraysh. ‘Muhammad is going to attack our caravan, so protect your merchandise.’ When the Quraysh heard this, the people of Mecca hastened to defend their property and protect their men as they were told Muhammad was lying in wait for them. [Al-Tabari, Vol. 7, p. 29]
The Raid on Waddan was the first Maghazi [invasion]. The Expedition of Harith was second. They encountered a large number of Quraysh in the Hijaz. Abu Bakr composed a poem about the raid: ‘When we called them to the truth they turned their backs and howled like bitches. Allah’s punishment on them will not tarry. I swear by the Lord of Camels that I am no perjurer. A valiant band will descend upon the Quraysh which will leave women husbandless. It will leave men dead, with vultures wheeling round. It will not spare the infidels. [Ishaq:281]
"Abu Sa'id al-Khudri reported that at the Battle of Hunain Allah's Messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah's Messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:" And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (Quran 4:. 24)" (i. e. they were lawful for them when their 'Idda period came to an end). [Sahih Muslim 8:3432]
Before pressing on to a specific field on Muhammad's various crimes against humanity, the atheist should elaborate on the second parameter being discussed: Islam's moral inferiority compared to irreligiousness.
Jim Crow Slavery – Rape Edition
Christian Ethiopian slaves in an auction in Ancol Market, Zakartah. The unending civil wars across the Khilafah's territory have enabled the military-civilian enterprise to 'harvest' a stable annual supply of slaves, while adhering to Islamic laws.
The Arab slave trade is the intersection of slavery and trade surrounding the Arab world and Indian Ocean, mainly in Western and Central Asia, Northern and Eastern Africa, India, and Europe. This barter occurred chiefly between the medieval era and continues to this present day, which has been greatly expanded since the establishment of the Khilafah.
Islam limited the sources of slaves which existed before the mission of the Prophet to just one source, namely slavery resulting from capturing prisoners from among the infidels, including women and children.
Shaykh al-Shanqeeti said: The reason why a person may be taken as a slave is his being a infidel and waging war against Allaah and His Messenger. If Allah enables the Muslims who are striving and sacrificing their lives and their wealth and all that Allah has given them to make the word of Allah supreme over the infidels, then He allows them to enslave the infidels when they capture them, unless the ruler chooses to free them or to ransom them, if that serves the interests of the Muslims.
In the Khilafah, millions upon millions of slaves are harvested from occupied colonies or provinces rife with non-Muslim resistance. In Dwipantara, the largest supply region are Bali, West Papua, and North Sumatra. Women and children are the favourites: children are easier to be broken mentally by traders and sold to work in mines, plantation, factories, or houses. Female captives meanwhile are precious objects: they are especially popular to be made sex slaves by the habib oligarchs and raped continuously until, after a few year, their sexual value degrades.
According to the Quran,
Quran 4:24: Also (prohibited are) women already married, except those whom your right hands possess: Thus hath Allah ordained (Prohibitions) against you: Except for these, all others are lawful, provided ye seek (them in marriage) with gifts from your property,- desiring chastity, not lust, seeing that ye derive benefit from them, give them their dowers (at least) as prescribed; but if, after a dower is prescribed, agree Mutually (to vary it), there is no blame on you, and Allah is All-knowing, All-wise.
Quran 23:1: "Certainly will the believers have succeeded:"
Quran 23:2: "They who are during their prayer humbly submissive"
Quran 23:3 "And they who turn away from ill speech"
Quran 23:4: "And they who are observant of zakah"
Quran 23:5: "And they who guard their private parts"
Quran 23:6: "Except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they will not be blamed -"
Quran 23:7: But whoever seeks beyond that, then those are the transgressors -"
Quran 33:50: "O Prophet, indeed We have made lawful to you your wives to whom you have given their due compensation and those your right hand possesses from what Allah has returned to you [of captives] and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who emigrated with you and a believing woman if she gives herself to the Prophet [and] if the Prophet wishes to marry her, [this is] only for you, excluding the [other] believers. We certainly know what We have made obligatory upon them concerning their wives and those their right hands possess, [but this is for you] in order that there will be upon you no discomfort. And ever is Allah Forgiving and Merciful."
Quran 70:29: "And those who guard their private parts,"
Quran 70:30: "Except from their wives or those their right hands possess, for indeed, they are not to be blamed -"
Quran 70:31: "But whoever seeks beyond that, then they are the transgressors -"
Islam fully supports sex slavery, violence, trafficking, and exploitation.
These verses clearly legalizes the practice of slavery and sex exploitation, a crime against humanity. The atheist must however not make wild strawman insults, but take notice that Islam has actually devised a great way to normalize the enslavement of fellow humans as okay. As Muhammad decreed, if we want to commit this horrific crime against humanity, we must do it nicely and politely. We shouldn't flog them too hard, give them enough food, and those who freed their slaves wiill be given many rewards from Allah. A brilliant solution to normalize the enslavement of fellow human beings.
Of course, Muhammad also actively approved the abduction, rape, and flogging of female prisoner of war and/or slaves:
"Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man came to Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I have a slave-girl who is our servant and she carries water for us and I have intercourse with her, but I do not want her to conceive. He said: Practise 'azl, if you so like, but what is decreed for her will come to her. The person stayed back (for some time) and then came and said: The girl has become pregnant, whereupon he said: I told you what was decreed for her would come to her." [Sahih Muslim 8:3383]
Narrated Abu Huraira: When we conquered Khaibar, we gained neither gold nor silver as booty, but we gained cows, camels, goods and gardens. Then we departed with Allah's Apostle to the valley of Al-Qira, and at that time Allah's Apostle had a slave called Mid'am who had been presented to him by one of Banu Ad-Dibbab. While the slave was dismounting the saddle of Allah's Apostle an arrow the thrower of which was unknown, came and hit him. The people said, "Congratulations to him for the martyrdom." Allah's Apostle said, "No, by Him in Whose Hand my soul is, the sheet (of cloth) which he had taken (illegally) on the day of Khaibar from the booty before the distribution of the booty, has become a flame of Fire burning him." On hearing that, a man brought one or two leather straps of shoes to the Prophet and said, "These are things I took (illegally)." On that Allah's Apostle said, "This is a strap, or these are two straps of Fire."[Sahih Bukhari 5:59:541]
Narrated 'Abdul 'Aziz: Anas said, 'When Allah's Apostle invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there yearly in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet . He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. When he entered the town, he said, 'Allahu Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. Whenever we approach near a (hostile) nation (to fight) then evil will be the morning of those who have been warned.' He repeated this thrice. The people came out for their jobs and some of them said, 'Muhammad (has come).' (Some of our companions added, "With his army.") We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, 'O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.' The Prophet said, 'Go and take any slave girl.' He took Safiya bint Huyai. A man came to the Prophet and said, 'O Allah's Apostles! You gave Safiya bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.' So the Prophet said, 'Bring him along with her.' So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet saw her, he said to Dihya, 'Take any slave girl other than her from the captives.' Anas added: The Prophet then manumitted her and married her..."[Sahih Bukhari 1:8:367]
Abu Sirma said to Abu Sa'id al Khadri (Allah he pleased with him): O Abu Sa'id, did you hear Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) mentioning al-'azl? He said: Yes, and added: We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter if you do not do it, for every soul that is to be born up to the Day of Resurrection will be born. [Sahih Muslim 8:3371]
Narrated AbuSa'id al-Khudri: A man said: Apostle of Allah, I have a slave-girl and I withdraw the phallus from her (while having intercourse), and I dislike that she becomes pregnant. I intend (by intercourse) what the men intend by it. The Jews say that withdrawing the phallus (azl) is burying the living girls on a small scale. He (the Prophet) said: The Jews told a lie. If Allah intends to create it, you cannot turn it away. [Sunan Abu Dawud 11:2166]
Narrated Ruwayfi' ibn Thabit al-Ansari: Should I tell you what I heard the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) say on the day of Hunayn: It is not lawful for a man who believes in Allah and the last day to water what another has sown with his water (meaning intercourse with women who are pregnant); it is not lawful for a man who believes in Allah and the Last Day to have intercourse with a captive woman till she is free from a menstrual course; and it is not lawful for a man who believes in Allah and the Last Day to sell spoil till it is divided. [Sunan Abu Dawud 11:2153]
Narrated Abdullah bin Zama: That he heard the Prophet delivering a sermon, and he mentioned the shecamel and the one who hamstrung it. Allah's Apostle recited:-- 'When, the most wicked man among them went forth (to hamstrung the she-camel).' (91.12.) Then he said, "A tough man whose equal was rare and who enjoyed the protection of his people, like Abi Zama went forth to (hamstrung) it." The Prophet then mentioned about the women (in his sermon). "It is not wise for anyone of you to lash his wife like a slave, for he might sleep with her the same evening." Then he advised them not to laugh when somebody breaks wind and said, "Why should anybody laugh at what he himself does?" [Sahih Bukhari 6:60:466]
A man from the Ansar called Basrah said: I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet). The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her (according to the version of al-Hasan). The version of Ibn AbusSari has: You people, flog her, or said: inflict hard punishment on him. [Sunan Abu Dawud 11:2126]
[i]'Imran b. Husain reported that a person who had no other property emancipated six slaves of his at the time of his death. Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) called for them and divided them into three sections, cast lots amongst them, and set two free and kept four in slavery; and he (the Holy Prophet) spoke severely of him. [Sahih Muslim 15:4112]
Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: The people of (Banu) Quraiza agreed to accept the verdict of Sad bin Mu'adh. So the Prophet sent for Sad, and the latter came (riding) a donkey and when he approached the Mosque, the Prophet said to the Ansar, "Get up for your chief or for the best among you." Then the Prophet said (to Sad)." These (i.e. Banu Quraiza) have agreed to accept your verdict." Sad said, "Kill their (men) warriors and take their offspring as captives, "On that the Prophet said, "You have judged according to Allah's Judgment," or said, "according to the King's judgment." [Sahih Bukhari 5:59:447]
Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, "If a lady slave commits illegal sexual intercourse and she is proved guilty of illegal sexual intercourse, then she should be flogged (fifty stripes) but she should not be admonished; and if she commits illegal sexual intercourse again, then she should be flogged again but should not be admonished; and if she commits illegal sexual intercourse for the third time, then she should be sold even for a hair rope." [Sahih Bukhari 8:82:823]
Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: A slave-girl belonging to the house of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) committed fornication. He (the Prophet) said: Rush up, Ali, and inflict the prescribed punishment on her. I then hurried up, and saw that blood was flowing from her, and did not stop. So I came to him and he said: Have you finished inflicting (punishment on her)? I said: I went to her while her blood was flowing. He said: Leave her alone till her bleeding stops; then inflict the prescribed punishment on her. And inflict the prescribed punishment on those whom your right hands possess (i.e. slaves). [Sunan Abu Dawud 38:4458]
Compare this to the #MeToo movement in western countries.
From this descriptions of Islam's primitive moral system, among many, the true nature of Muhammad and his oligharcal companions are uncovered: warlords. Violent tribal cult-based warlords, raiding and pillaging its rivals with power and wealth and lust as their goal. And they all have committed as set of horrific breaches:
Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of a crime against peace.
Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression and other crimes against peace.
War crimes, including: intentionally killing civilians, torturing, pillaging, giving no quarter, and egregiously violating the principles of distinction and proportionality, and military necessity.
Crimes against humanity, including: genocide, slavery, sex slavery, deportation, ethnic cleansing, extrajudicial punishments, torture, rape, political persecution, religious persecution, and dehumanization of fellow humans.
Hitler's companions sentenced to death for their vicious crimes. Had Muhammad and his companions lived in the modern era, those tribal warlords might have received the same verdict for their crimes.
These, under 1946 Nuremberg laws, showed that Muhammad and his companions are eligible to be sentenced to death for their crimes, and hanged next to their fellow human rights criminals, such as Seys-Inquart and Kaltenbrunner. And while the roles of each person varies – 'Ali, for example, are much more harsh and his criminal count would be higher – it is clear that someone who can be indicted with Nazi war crimes isn't really a good role model to be followed.[/font]