Right to LifeBoard

Nous ne sommes pas moutons. Nous sommes les gens. Et nous ne sommes pas contents.

Adawn wrote:

Dude, if ur in a Pro-Lifer region, why would you go for a Pro-Choicer candidate?

It's not like there are many options. lol

Liniran wrote:

Sorry to be a nuisance, but you still haven't changed my label on the map from Benathollin to Liniran.

I know I'm busy with a lot of stuff in IRL and my main nation business.

Jeinasi wrote:

I don't understand why people support him
Trump doesn't know what he's doing

Neither does Johnson as far as foreign policy a D Clinton is as crooked as a circle so I would rather have a candidate with no experience, but with strong conviction than the first two. I agree he isn't knowledgeable, but his motives are perfect. Not his language, but motives

The CSNA wrote:

I know I'm busy with a lot of stuff in IRL and my main nation business.

Ok, feel free to take as long as you want.

Adawn wrote:

Dude, if ur in a Pro-Lifer region, why would you go for a Pro-Choicer candidate?

I would hardly call him a pro-choice candidate, then again I wouldn't call him pro-life either. Personally he says he believes in the sanctity of life for the unborn and as governor he tried to ban certain abortions. People say he is "pro-choice" because he doesn't believe government is equipped to deal with this issue, rather a social movement would be more successful. That being said, he would further Pro-Life goals such as defunding planned parenthood while not furthering any Pro-Choice issues.

Adawn wrote:

Neither does Johnson as far as foreign policy a D Clinton is as crooked as a circle so I would rather have a candidate with no experience, but with strong conviction than the first two.

If you think Johnson's foreign policy is poor you are most likely a strong interventionist, a neoconservative or simply ignorant of his policy. In my opinion (and the opinion of a majority of the armed forces) he has the best and most common sense policy.

https://www.johnsonweld.com/foreign_policy_and_national_defense

http://thehill.com/policy/defense/288546-poll-libertarian-johnson-beating-trump-clinton-among-active-duty-troops

Now he isn't the perfect candidate, and I doubt he will gain the presidency but what my goal for Libertarians this year is to make 5% of the popular vote, which I see is definitely attainable. If he gets 5% of the vote then next Election Cycle the Libertarian party gets federal funding, automatic placement to all ballots in every state, among other things. This will help spread the word of freedom, safety, and economic prosperity.

Adawn wrote:

I agree he isn't knowledgeable, but his motives are perfect. Not his language, but motives

I agree with this statement, and it is the reason why I am not too afraid of a Trump presidency. I know he will associate with the right people who can help hime make the right decisions (only if they could convince him how poor his protectionist economics are).

Pan-celtic nation wrote:

I would hardly call him a pro-choice candidate, then again I wouldn't call him pro-life either. Personally he says he believes in the sanctity of life for the unborn and as governor he tried to ban certain abortions. People say he is "pro-choice" because he doesn't believe government is equipped to deal with this issue, rather a social movement would be more successful. That being said, he would further Pro-Life goals such as defunding planned parenthood while not furthering any Pro-Choice issues.
If you think Johnson's foreign policy is poor you are most likely a strong interventionist, a neoconservative or simply ignorant of his policy. In my opinion (and the opinion of a majority of the armed forces) he has the best and most common sense policy.
https://www.johnsonweld.com/foreign_policy_and_national_defense
http://thehill.com/policy/defense/288546-poll-libertarian-johnson-beating-trump-clinton-among-active-duty-troops
Now he isn't the perfect candidate, and I doubt he will gain the presidency but what my goal for Libertarians this year is to make 5% of the popular vote, which I see is definitely attainable. If he gets 5% of the vote then next Election Cycle the Libertarian party gets federal funding, automatic placement to all ballots in every state, among other things. This will help spread the word of freedom, safety, and economic prosperity.
I agree with this statement, and it is the reason why I am not too afraid of a Trump presidency. I know he will associate with the right people who can help hime make the right decisions (only if they could convince him how poor his protectionist economics are).

I only assumed John's knowledge Is poor is because he couldn't name the leader of North Korea: Kim Jung. But, I haven't read John's foreign policy. Anyway, it would seem that y'all would pull for Trump, I mean who wouldn't want to see Roe vs. Wade overturned? And I agree that his economic plans won't boost the economy, but I think we should get out of TPP, and some how get American jobs back. NAFTA has tripled our pay so I'm in support of it as if right now...I don't know if I support the abolishment of tariffs but I'm still researching... however I do know that TPP is bad for America and I think Trump is right on that

Pan-celtic nation wrote:

Dude, if ur in a Conservative region, why would you go for a Liberal candidate?
I mean Trump supports raising the minimum wage, is fairly liberal on healthcare issues and student loans, supports paid maternity leave for 6 weeks, among other left-leaning policies. Trump is a Big Government candidate, I remember the days when the Grand Old Party stood for limited government...
No, I don't actually classify Trump as a Democrat or Liberal, but if you call him a Conservative he is a very poor one at that.

He is a moderate Conservative, which is faaar better than Hillary and Gary. And strategically he's better for this election cycle for Conservatives to pick. I am very pro limited government and I do agree with you that he has big government policies except when education is involved however those are the only left wing policies I have heard, the ones you mentioned. He has a [b]HUGE/b] right wing policy just off of a couple of subjects
•Wants to protect 2nd Amendment
•Stop Common Core
•Overturn Roe vs. Wade
•Stop Obamacare
•Agaisnt TPP
•Pro-Keystone Pipeline
•Big supporter of Military

And his Child Care reform, and Veterans Aid may look expensive, idk, I haven't looked at it, but on controversial and popular issues, Donald Trump is more Conservative than not, and he is definitely the guy whom Pro-Liferd need to elect as President. Not Gary or Hillary.

Adawn wrote:

Not Gary or Hillary

Why not take a fourth option? Evan McMullin, 2016.

Adawn wrote:

Because this election is to precious if u dont vote for Trump, ur voting for Hillary. It's not strategically good in my opinion if u want a pro lifer in the white house

As the saying goes, "A vote for a third party is a vote for Hillary". Hence, why Hillary Clinton won in 1860, instead of Abraham Lincoln.

What do you guys think about Mr. Darrell Castle? He is definitely pro-life.