«12. . .2,2222,2232,2242,2252,2262,2272,228. . .3,9283,929»
Yes. Yes. A thousand times. Yes.
You NSers seem to enjoy walking around the biggest point.
Here.
Killing an Animal
*Gives a human want (don't need as food from plants)
*Hurts the animal
*Done without consent
Now sec with one
*Gives a human want
*Hurts the animal
*Done without consent
Board elections are imminent.
TTA, I'm gonna need your party and a promise that you'll use Med here if you win.
Also, Minerva, I see you're on.
Let's do the thing.
Yay, the thing!
What is the thing?
The thing where I give you the words and you become State manager.
Okay sure. Work your magic.
Alright then.
Everyone shut up.
R. of Minerva, do you solemnly swear to protect, defend, and uphold the Constitution of Libertatem; to execute the will of the People of Libertatem within the rightful extents of the law; Do you affirm that it is your solemn duty to defend Libertatem from all threats, foreign and domestic, and to uphold the integrity of the region; and promise to uphold these obligations understanding the sanctity of your office, so help you God?
DRP
And yes I'll use Med. I'm trying to right now but mu habit of using Deseret...is...killing me.
I do swear to solemnly swear to protect, defend, and uphold the Constitution of Libertatem; execute the will of the People of Libertatem within the rightful extents of the law; affirm that it is my solemn duty to defend Libertatem from all threats, foreign and domestic, and uphold the integrity of the region; and promise to uphold these obligations understanding the sanctity of your office, so help me Ayn Rand.
Welcome to the State Department.
Thank you for your service, Funkytopia.
Danke schon.
*Gives a want, AND a need.
*The animal isn't hurt whilst taking eggs/ milking cow. The animal is also killed painlessly and quickly. No hurt.
* You can't use this argument. Animals have no way to give consent.
1. You don't need meat. It's a want.
2.It's hurt when being killed for food. How? It loses its life.
3. That's the argument used against Beastiality.
1. Yes, many people need meat. Not everyone has food too choose from. Vegans are usually elitist and can afford NOT to eat meat.
2. No, it isn't. Did you not read? They are killed quick and painlessly. They don't know they are dead. No hurt.
3. There is SO many reasons why bestiality is f*cked up.
1. Most people can farm or take eggs/milk. They don't need meat.
2. So it'd pwrfectly gine to kill without consent but not screw without consent?
3. Name them...all of them.
Consent is a relative thing when it comes to this. You have to use it in context. It's perfectly fine to use an animal to feed yourself because it helps you survive. Sticking your stuff inside an animal isn't necessary to survive.
I'm momentarily exiting this conversation on the RMB for elections.
A billion times yes.
Definately Yes^
Congratulations Rotgeheim for joining the Reaganist Libertarian Party!
Woop! Woop!
Thank you, dear Humpheria.
1. What? MOST people are unqualified to farm their own, or raise livestock. Meat is still needed, again, not everyone can afford such a lifestyle such as veganism.
2. Completely different things. You can't compare screwing an animal for pleasure to eating an animal for sustenance.
3. Well, the whole fact that you want to stick your d*ck in an animal is f*cked up enough. You can't look past this.
«12. . .2,2222,2232,2242,2252,2262,2272,228. . .3,9283,929»
Advertisement
