«12. . .3,5243,5253,5263,5273,5283,5293,530. . .3,6073,608»
Greetings from New York City!
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-news/item/19486-merry-christmas-united-nations-declares-arms-trade-treaty-to-go-into-effect-dec-24
RED ALERT! Share this with everyone on every region you have a nation in.
Fvck the UN.
received pronunciation is a tool of statist oppression in the UK.
just realized that yeah the soviet union was much more efficient than the united states at torture. or, at the very least, got more people tortured for a lot less money. makes you wonder how efficient torture would be if we had true capitalism.
Drafted a "Right to Bear Arms Act" for the GA.
Thread here:
viewtopic.php?f=9&t=323334
Russia is freer than the United States. Because in the United States you have the right to bear arms. In Russia, you have the right to the whole bear.
Yes, but why would anyone need a whole bear? Besides, the 2nd amendment doesn't even give you the right to have bear arms, just for militias to have bear arms. - American leftist argument
The Nationstates General Senate is back up for anyone who is interested.
Having a pet bear seems good for property security. According to www.obviousstudies.com.
The danger of giving an example of why a right is useful. No Founder (none - not even Hamilton) would have said "you can only own a firearm if you are in the militia", but (yes) American collectivists have used this "argument" - with their desire that the United States be a peaceful as gun control Chicago.
The classic example is towns on the Mexican-Texan border (equally Hispanic on both sides of the border - same culture), the gun control Mexican side of such towns have vastly HIGHER murder rates than the "evil" American side of such towns.
Derp?
Herpaderp
ITT we discuss the benefits and drawbacks of progressive taxation.
There is no benefits.
Fairtax all the way.
The Fairtax (with its prebate) is progressive, as I understand it.
If there had to be taxation in order to defend individual rights, I would prefer the Fairtax to most other systems.
fairtax is silly and is predicated on false rhetoric and a distorted definition of the word "fair"
The fairtax is a tax on fair female sex slaves. Obviously.
Silly Aly.
http://www.cato.org/blog/unfair-criticism-fair-tax
In essence, the FairTax puts a national, progressive sales tax in place of a traditional income tax.
progressive on consumption, that is.
I'd much rather tax unproductive things, like "sin taxes", property, wealth, land, or income on people whose propensity to consume is much lower. I'd rather not distort important economic spheres, like consumption, investment, or production.
«12. . .3,5243,5253,5263,5273,5283,5293,530. . .3,6073,608»
Advertisement
